Monday, August 29 , 2016, 1:56 pm | Fair 74º

  • Follow Noozhawk on LinkedIn
  • Follow Noozhawk on Pinterest
  • Follow Noozhawk on YouTube
 
 
 
 

Local News

In Class-Action Lawsuit, Santa Barbara Judge Decides CHP Must Update Criminal Records

A recent ruling by a Santa Barbara judge could have statewide implications for law enforcement agencies not following a particular statute — the California Highway Patrol among them.

The process of notifying someone arrested for a crime but not actually prosecuted for the alleged illegal act has been written into California penal code for all agencies since 1975, but the recent case highlights the CHP’s failure to adhere to that law.

Santa Barbara Superior Court Judge Thomas Anderle last week ruled in favor of a plaintiff who was arrested near Santa Barbara in May 2011 on suspicion of driving under the influence.

Although the man was booked into County Jail and later released, with a notice to appear in court, the District Attorney’s office decided against filing criminal charges.

The CHP never updated the man’s criminal record to reflect he had been “detained” instead of arrested, as required in Penal Code Section 849.5, according to Anderle.

The man filed suit in May 2012 to get an official writ of mandate against the CHP and turned the case into a class-action suit, believing others were impacted.

After hearing from both sides, Anderle ruled the CHP must give the plaintiff an official certificate of detention and that all arrest records maintained by the California Department of Justice should be updated accordingly.

The judge also ordered the CHP to go back through its records to find and send detention certificates to anyone else arrested and released without formal charges since June 2009.

Nearly 200 people could be impacted, Anderle wrote in his judgment, and all records must be updated by Sept. 15.

Although the case was specific to the CHP, the ruling broadly applies to all enforcement agencies, many of which already adhere to the code, said William C. Makler, a Santa Barbara attorney who represented the plaintiff.

Santa Barbara Police and the County Sheriff’s Department voluntarily follow the statute, he said.

“I think that’s the important point,” Makler told Noozhawk.

“The CHP is a little bit the outlier. They wanted to apparently be told by a judge. The agency has to change the way it operates statewide.”

Makler said this was the first case of its kind. He didn’t want to share details about his client because the point of the suit was to relieve him from the stigma of being arrested.

A job search is difficult when one has a criminal record including an arrest, which implies being shackled in handcuffs for doing something wrong, he said.

“When you’re detained, it doesn’t imply that you’ve done anything seriously wrong,” Makler said.

“These 200 people, wherever they are, wouldn’t even know that they did not suffer, legally speaking, what would be considered an arrest. People have a right to know about these remedies.”

The CHP could appeal the decision. Attorney General Nancy James, who represented the agency, could not be reached for comment Tuesday.

According to the ruling, James argued against issuing the detention certificate, focusing on what the term “released” means and when in the process a person is officially released.

The CHP contended that “release,” under the code specified, occurs before prosecutors decide to file charges, and that historical context shows the code would apply only to those arrested and released due to lack of evidence supporting probable cause.

In this case, the DA’s office didn’t file formal charges because of the plaintiff’s low blood-alcohol content and otherwise clean record.

Anderle disagreed, dismissing the CHP’s arguments as unsupported by law and facts.

Noozhawk staff writer Gina Potthoff can be reached at .(JavaScript must be enabled to view this email address). Follow Noozhawk on Twitter: @noozhawk, @NoozhawkNews and @NoozhawkBiz. Connect with Noozhawk on Facebook.

Reader Comments

Noozhawk's intent is not to limit the discussion of our stories but to elevate it. Comments should be relevant and must be free of profanity and abusive language and attacks.

By posting on Noozhawk, you:

» Agree to be respectful. Noozhawk encourages intelligent and impassioned discussion and debate, but now has a zero-tolerance policy for those who cannot express their opinions in a civil manner.

» Agree not to use Noozhawk’s forums for personal attacks. This includes any sort of personal attack — including, but not limited to, the people in our stories, the journalists who create these stories, fellow readers who comment on our stories, or anyone else in our community.

» Agree not to post on Noozhawk any comments that can be construed as libelous, defamatory, obscene, profane, vulgar, harmful, threatening, tortious, harassing, abusive, hateful, sexist, racially or ethnically objectionable, or that are invasive of another’s privacy.

» Agree not to post in a manner than emulates, purports or pretends to be someone else. Under no circumstances are readers posting to Noozhawk to knowingly use the name or identity of another person, whether that is another reader on this site, a public figure, celebrity, elected official or fictitious character. This also means readers will not knowingly give out any personal information of other members of these forums.

» Agree not to solicit others. You agree you will not use Noozhawk’s forums to solicit and/or advertise for personal blogs and websites, without Noozhawk’s express written approval.

Noozhawk’s management and editors, in our sole discretion, retain the right to remove individual posts or to revoke the access privileges of anyone who we believe has violated any of these terms or any other term of this agreement; however, we are under no obligation to do so.

Support Noozhawk Today

You are an important ally in our mission to deliver clear, objective, high-quality professional news reporting for Santa Barbara, Goleta and the rest of Santa Barbara County. Join the Hawks Club today to help keep Noozhawk soaring.

We offer four membership levels: $5 a month, $10 a month, $25 a month or $1 a week. Payments can be made through PayPal below, or click here for information on recurring credit-card payments.

Thank you for your vital support.



Daily Noozhawk

Subscribe to Noozhawk's A.M. Report, our free e-Bulletin sent out every day at 4:15 a.m. with Noozhawk's top stories, hand-picked by the editors.

Sign Up Now >