Tuesday, October 25 , 2016, 8:57 pm | Fair 59º


Local News

U.S. Appeals Court Overturns NLRB Ruling in News-Press Case

Citing First Amendment protections, a federal appeals court has sided with the owner of the Santa Barbara News-Press and overturned a National Labor Relations Board  order that eight reporters fired during a union-organizing battle be reinstated.

The U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia — acting on an appeal by News-Press owner Ampersand Publishing LLC —handed down its 14-page decision Tuesday.

“The (NLRB’s) analysis was tainted by its mistaken belief that employees had a statutorily protected right to engage in collective action aimed at limiting Ampersand’s editorial control over the News-Press,” the judges wrote in rejecting the NLRB’s decision in August 2011.

Arguments in the case took place Nov. 8 before a three-judge panel including Chief Judge David B. Sentelle, Senior Circuit Judge Stephen F. Williams and Circuit Judge Karen LeCraft Henderson, all of whom were appointed by Republican presidents. The opinion was written by Williams.

Don Katich, director of news operations for the News-Press, provided a written statement commenting on the ruling. It read in part:

“The court vindicated our First Amendment rights, and validated what we believed to be appropriate action all along. We had faith that once an objective, judicial panel viewed our case, the biases and overzealousness of the NLRB would come to light…

“We will continue to publish the best newspaper in the country, free from any attempted interference – government, union, or otherwise. We will continue to strive for unbiased coverage of the news, and to serve the readers of the greater Santa Barbara area to the best of our capabilities.”

In a 55-page decision released in August 2011, the three-member NLRB board had upheld a 2007 ruling by Administrative Law Judge William Kocol, who found that co-publishers Wendy McCaw and Arthur Von Wiesenberger had acted unlawfully by waging an “extensive campaign of retaliatory conduct against employees because they exercised their rights to seek union representation.” Kocol’s ruling had been appealed by Ampersand Publishing LLC, which owns the newspaper.

In its own ruling, the NLRB concluded that the News-Press “committed multiple unfair labor practices during a union organizing campaign by newsroom employees.”

The board rejected Ampersand’s argument that an order in favor of the employees would interfere with the publisher’s First Amendment right to control the newspaper’s editorial content.

During the “News-Press Meltdown,” as it’s known locally, 15 journalists resigned in protest, claiming McCaw, the sole owner of Ampersand LLC, was interfering in their news reporting and editing. Newsroom employees later voted to join the Teamsters union.

The NLRB board ordered the News-Press to offer reinstatement to eight employees who were fired for “biased reporting” and hanging a banner from a footbridge that urged people to cancel their subscriptions. The board also ordered the paper’s management to rescind discriminatory evaluations of four union supporters, rescind 11 suspension notices and give back pay to all discriminated employees.

The eight fired reporters are Melinda Burns, Anna Davison, Melissa Evans, Dawn Hobbs, Rob Kuznia, Barney McManigal, Tom Schultz and John Zant. Burns was fired in 2006 and the rest were fired in early 2007.

“We believe the court was wrong in its reading of the record and application of the law,” said Ira Gottlieb, an attorney representing the teamsters, said of Tuesday’s ruling.

“We’re quite disappointed with (the decision),” he added.“We think that the court expanded the First Amendment beyond where precedent up till now has allowed it to go.

“The court turned it from a sword protecting a newspaper’s right to publish, to now being a sword where you can lash out against employees who allegedly threaten editorial prerogative.”

Gottlieb said no decision has been made regarding a possible appeal of the decision. The NLRB could seek a rehearing from the Appeals Court, or ask for a review by the U.S. Supreme Court.

Noozhawk staff writer Giana Magnoli contributed to this story.

Scroll down to read the court’s ruling in this case.

Noozhawk executive editor Tom Bolton can be reached at .(JavaScript must be enabled to view this email address). Follow Noozhawk on Twitter: @noozhawk, @NoozhawkNews and @NoozhawkBiz. Connect with Noozhawk on Facebook.


Reader Comments

Noozhawk's intent is not to limit the discussion of our stories but to elevate it. Comments should be relevant and must be free of profanity and abusive language and attacks.

By posting on Noozhawk, you:

» Agree to be respectful. Noozhawk encourages intelligent and impassioned discussion and debate, but now has a zero-tolerance policy for those who cannot express their opinions in a civil manner.

» Agree not to use Noozhawk’s forums for personal attacks. This includes any sort of personal attack — including, but not limited to, the people in our stories, the journalists who create these stories, fellow readers who comment on our stories, or anyone else in our community.

» Agree not to post on Noozhawk any comments that can be construed as libelous, defamatory, obscene, profane, vulgar, harmful, threatening, tortious, harassing, abusive, hateful, sexist, racially or ethnically objectionable, or that are invasive of another’s privacy.

» Agree not to post in a manner than emulates, purports or pretends to be someone else. Under no circumstances are readers posting to Noozhawk to knowingly use the name or identity of another person, whether that is another reader on this site, a public figure, celebrity, elected official or fictitious character. This also means readers will not knowingly give out any personal information of other members of these forums.

» Agree not to solicit others. You agree you will not use Noozhawk’s forums to solicit and/or advertise for personal blogs and websites, without Noozhawk’s express written approval.

Noozhawk’s management and editors, in our sole discretion, retain the right to remove individual posts or to revoke the access privileges of anyone who we believe has violated any of these terms or any other term of this agreement; however, we are under no obligation to do so.

Support Noozhawk Today

You are an important ally in our mission to deliver clear, objective, high-quality professional news reporting for Santa Barbara, Goleta and the rest of Santa Barbara County. Join the Hawks Club today to help keep Noozhawk soaring.

We offer four membership levels: $5 a month, $10 a month, $25 a month or $1 a week. Payments can be made through PayPal below, or click here for information on recurring credit-card payments.

Thank you for your vital support.

Daily Noozhawk

Subscribe to Noozhawk's A.M. Report, our free e-Bulletin sent out every day at 4:15 a.m. with Noozhawk's top stories, hand-picked by the editors.

Sign Up Now >