Pixel Tracker

Sunday, January 20 , 2019, 9:24 am | Fair 56º

 
 
 
 

Santa Maria Valley Chamber of Commerce Outlines Opposition to Measure P

Citing the damage Measure P would inflict on Santa Barbara County's economy and vital public services, the Santa Maria Valley Chamber of Commerce announced on Wednesday its opposition to the November ballot initiative that would shut down on-shore oil and gas production in the county.

"Measure P is a deceptive, poorly thought-out initiative that will harm Santa Barbara County, particularly by damaging our economy and undermining the solvency of local government," said Glenn Morris, president and CEO of the Santa Maria Valley Chamber of Commerce, which represents employers and businesses in Santa Barbara County's largest city and surrounding region. "Measure P supporters claim that it will ban 'fracking,' which is neither true nor necessary, since no one is using or proposing to use this method in Santa Barbara County. The simple reality is that hydraulic fracturing of the Monterey Shale formation in California is not technically feasible.”

What Measure P will do, however, is shut down existing onshore oil and gas production in just a few years.

“The chamber board is very concerned that Measure P will shut down existing on-shore oil and gas production, which will eliminate almost 2,000 good-paying jobs and cost the county millions in revenues to fund vital public services like schools and fire and police protection,” said Tim Ritchie, chamber board chairman.

Morris noted that onshore oil and gas production has been carried on safely in Santa Barbara County for more than a century, and is a critical part of the local economy. An impartial analysis prepared by Santa Barbara County found that Measure P would prohibit 100 percent of the production techniques safely being used in active oil and gas wells. There is no evidence over the course of a hundred years that these techniques adversely impact our water supply or our environment.

"The people of this county can't afford this economic shock of shutting down on-shore oil and gas production," Ritchie said. "Measure P would deliver a body blow to our local economy.”

Morris pointed out that an economic impact report prepared by the UCSB Economic Forecast Project in September 2013 for the Santa Maria Valley Chamber of Commerce, found evidence to clearly illustrate and underscore this point, including:

» The total economic impact of the onshore oil and gas industry on Santa Barbara County in 2011 was $291.4 million and can be as large as $402.1 million.

» The industry had a total impact on Santa Barbara County's employment of 1,953 jobs in 2011, including 958 direct jobs with an additional 1,005 jobs created indirectly.

» The onshore oil and gas industry is an important source of high-wage jobs in a community that is projected to predominantly add low paying professions in the near future. The average employee earns an annual salary between $75,000 and $100,000, in sharp contrast to the median household income of $58,000 in Santa Barbara County is 2011.

"The ripple effect of such loses of mostly well-paid blue collar positions would be felt by everyone," Morris said, "because the newly unemployed can no longer buy groceries, pay rent, buy clothes and otherwise contribute to the local economy.”

Morris pointed out that this economic loss also translates into less revenue for vital public services. According to Santa Barbara County Auditor-Controller Bob Geis, local oil and gas companies will pay $20.3 million in property taxes in 2014. These taxes are allocated as follows:

» Approximately $12.7 million will go to schools.

» The county will directly receive $4.4 million into its General Fund to help provide essential public services.

» The county’s Fire Protection District will get $2.6 million.

» $.6 million will go to other special districts within the county.

» Local cities will receive $.3 million to provide services for education, health care, public safety, public assistance, public ways and facilities.

In addition to reducing tax revenue, legal experts predict a wave of lawsuits against the county from owners of mineral rights because Measure P will amount to a governmental "taking" depriving them of the use of their property.

"Experts believe the county’s liability for damages and litigation expenses could exceed $100 million,” Morris said. "The reasons for opposing Measure P are numerous, and the need for this deceptive initiative is non-existent."

Ritchie added: "The Santa Maria Valley Chamber of Commerce urges all Santa Barbara County voters to support our local economy and vote no on Measure P."

 

Support Noozhawk Today

You are an important ally in our mission to deliver clear, objective, high-quality professional news reporting for Santa Barbara, Goleta and the rest of Santa Barbara County. Join the Hawks Club today to help keep Noozhawk soaring.

We offer four membership levels: $5 a month, $10 a month, $25 a month or $1 a week. Payments can be made using a credit card, Apple Pay or Google Pay, or click here for information on recurring credit-card payments and a mailing address for checks.

Thank you for your vital support.

Become a Noozhawk Supporter

First name
Last name
Email
Select your monthly membership
Or choose an annual membership
×

Payment Information

Membership Subscription

You are enrolling in . Thank you for joining the Hawks Club.

Payment Method

Pay by Credit Card:

Mastercard, Visa, American Express, Discover
One click only, please!

Pay with Apple Pay or Google Pay:

Noozhawk partners with Stripe to provide secure invoicing and payments processing.
You may cancel your membership at any time by sending an email to .(JavaScript must be enabled to view this email address).

  • Ask
  • Vote
  • Investigate
  • Answer

Noozhawk Asks: What’s Your Question?

Welcome to Noozhawk Asks, a new feature in which you ask the questions, you help decide what Noozhawk investigates, and you work with us to find the answers.

Here’s how it works: You share your questions with us in the nearby box. In some cases, we may work with you to find the answers. In others, we may ask you to vote on your top choices to help us narrow the scope. And we’ll be regularly asking you for your feedback on a specific issue or topic.

We also expect to work together with the reader who asked the winning questions to find the answer together. Noozhawk’s objective is to come at questions from a place of curiosity and openness, and we believe a transparent collaboration is the key to achieve it.

The results of our investigation will be published here in this Noozhawk Asks section. Once or twice a month, we plan to do a review of what was asked and answered.

Thanks for asking!

Click Here to Get Started >

Reader Comments

Noozhawk is no longer accepting reader comments on our articles. Click here for the announcement. Readers are instead invited to submit letters to the editor by emailing them to [email protected]. Please provide your full name and community, as well as contact information for verification purposes only.