Pixel Tracker

Wednesday, December 19 , 2018, 2:38 am | Fair 45º


Shelby Foothills Coalition Forms to Oppose North Goleta Development Plan

A coalition of Santa Barbara County organizations has announced the formation of the Shelby Foothills Coalition, the product of a series of meetings to discuss community challenges engendered by the proposal to build 60 high-end houses on the Shelby property north of Cathedral Oaks Road near Glen Annie Golf Course.  

Development on this parcel of land, which is zoned for agriculture, is contrary to Goleta’s General Plan. SFC members are committed to encouraging broad community participation in opposing the Shelby development because it would extend urban sprawl into the Goleta foothills, threaten an important wildlife corridor, damage sensitive species and habitats, use precious water that is in dangerously short supply and result in net costs to the City of Goleta.

One of the members of the coalition, Barbara Massey of The Goodland Coalition, said, “Our members are bound together by the belief that rezoning for the development of this 14-acre agricultural  parcel is wrong on many levels. Ten years ago Goleta residents and Goleta City staff and Council carefully crafted the General Plan over a period of many months. Changing the Shelby zoning now would completely contradict that effort.”

Lee Moldaver, of the Citizens Planning Association of Santa Barbara County, commented, “One of CPA’s principal positions is to support Goleta residents’ desire to protect agriculture and open space, as embodied in Goleta’s General Plan, and to limit suburban sprawl into the foothills.”

The Shelby parcel was zoned for agriculture in Goleta’s initial General Plan. In 2012 Goleta residents voted for G2012, Goleta’s Farmland Protection Initiative, by 71 percent, reaffirming residents’ determination to protect agriculture in Goleta.

Because the application for the Shelby development project was submitted just before G2012, the Shelby parcel is not subject to G2012; however, this parcel is subject to Goleta’s General Plan, which zones this parcel for only agricultural use.  

Coalition members such as the Santa Barbara Audubon Society and the Santa Barbara Urban Creeks Council have expressed concern about the negative impacts of this development on sensitive habitat and the creek.

Steve Ferry from Audubon said, “This parcel is a key wildlife corridor that, although now compatible with agriculture, would be destroyed by the human activity associated with a housing development.”

Another key issue is the project’s water supply. Connie Hannah of the Santa Barbara League of Women Voters said, “The parcel does not have enough water to accommodate the proposed development. The developer should never have submitted such a proposal during this historic drought, when Goletans have made so many sacrifices to conserve water.  Goleta’s General Plan and state law prohibit approval of development without sufficient water.”

Coalition members resist any assertion that such a development would help relieve Goleta’s shortage of workforce housing. As indicated by Margaret Connell of the Santa Barbara County Action Network, “the 60 units proposed for this development are projected to sell for approximately $1,000,000, unaffordable to over 95 percent of South Coast residents.” Such housing would add to congestion, loss of views, air pollution and other impacts already occurring due to rampant development in western Goleta.

In addition, of the minuscule amount of property tax returned to Goleta from the State of California, approximately 50 percent must be transferred to Santa Barbara County under the revenue neutrality agreement between Goleta and the county.

A residential development on the Shelby property would certainly be a drain on the city’s coffers, requiring services costing more than tax revenues to the city.  Approving this development would exacerbate the City’s already-difficult financial position.  

Scott Cooper of the Santa Barbara Audubon Society concluded, “Our coalition members have already filed objections to Shelby’s flawed Draft Environmental Impact Report. When the final report is made public, probably this spring, we will redouble our opposition at Goleta’s Planning Commission and, if need be, at Goleta’s City Council and beyond.”

So far, Citizens Planning Association of Santa Barbara County, The League of Women Voters of Santa Barbara, The Goodland Coalition, Santa Barbara Audubon Society, Santa Barbara County Action Network and Santa Barbara Urban Creeks Council have put their support behind the Shelby Foothills Coalition. Other individuals and neighborhood groups are expected to join in opposition to the Shelby development.

For additional information and to become involved in this effort, visit StopShelby.org.

Steve Ferry is the co-organizer of the Shelby Foothills Coalition.


Support Noozhawk Today

You are an important ally in our mission to deliver clear, objective, high-quality professional news reporting for Santa Barbara, Goleta and the rest of Santa Barbara County. Join the Hawks Club today to help keep Noozhawk soaring.

We offer four membership levels: $5 a month, $10 a month, $25 a month or $1 a week. Payments can be made using a credit card, Apple Pay or Google Pay, or click here for information on recurring credit-card payments and a mailing address for checks.

Thank you for your vital support.

Become a Noozhawk Supporter

First name
Last name
Select your monthly membership
Or choose an annual membership

Payment Information

Membership Subscription

You are enrolling in . Thank you for joining the Hawks Club.

Payment Method

Pay by Credit Card:

Mastercard, Visa, American Express, Discover
One click only, please!

Pay with Apple Pay or Google Pay:

Noozhawk partners with Stripe to provide secure invoicing and payments processing.
You may cancel your membership at any time by sending an email to .(JavaScript must be enabled to view this email address).

  • Ask
  • Vote
  • Investigate
  • Answer

Noozhawk Asks: What’s Your Question?

Welcome to Noozhawk Asks, a new feature in which you ask the questions, you help decide what Noozhawk investigates, and you work with us to find the answers.

Here’s how it works: You share your questions with us in the nearby box. In some cases, we may work with you to find the answers. In others, we may ask you to vote on your top choices to help us narrow the scope. And we’ll be regularly asking you for your feedback on a specific issue or topic.

We also expect to work together with the reader who asked the winning questions to find the answer together. Noozhawk’s objective is to come at questions from a place of curiosity and openness, and we believe a transparent collaboration is the key to achieve it.

The results of our investigation will be published here in this Noozhawk Asks section. Once or twice a month, we plan to do a review of what was asked and answered.

Thanks for asking!

Click Here to Get Started >

Reader Comments

Noozhawk is no longer accepting reader comments on our articles. Click here for the announcement. Readers are instead invited to submit letters to the editor by emailing them to [email protected]. Please provide your full name and community, as well as contact information for verification purposes only.