Monday, March 19 , 2018, 11:47 pm | Fair 53º


Statewide Survey Finds Strong Support for Special Election, Shift to Local Governments

Gov. Brown’s ideas fare better than his approval rating in early weeks of his term

Two-thirds of Californians say a special election on Gov. Jerry Brown’s tax and fee proposal is a good idea, and a majority are generally satisfied with his budget plan. These are among the key findings in a statewide survey released Wednesday by the Public Policy Institute of California with support from the James Irvine Foundation.

In the first weeks of the new governor’s term, the state’s fiscal crisis and worries about the economy weigh heavily on Californians’ mood. But they are decidedly more optimistic than they were last fall about the direction of the state.

“Californians are beginning to feel more hopeful — that the economy is improving, that the governor and Legislature can get something done,” said Mark Baldassare, PPIC CEO and survey director. “But that hope is fragile and could dissolve quickly. The challenge for Brown is to convince Californians that his complex budget plan is a real solution to the state’s fiscal troubles.”

In Early Reaction to Budget, 58 Percent Satisfied

When read a description of the governor’s proposed budget, 58 percent of Californians are generally satisfied (29 percent dissatisfied). Across party lines, there is more satisfaction (64 percent Democrats, 57 percent independents, 49 percent Republicans) than dissatisfaction (26 percent Democrats, 31 percent independents, 37 percent Republicans) among residents. Still, overwhelming majorities (75 percent adults, 73 percent likely voters) are at least somewhat concerned about the spending reductions in the governor’s plan.

Brown’s proposed special election on a tax and fee package to prevent further budget cuts is a good idea, according to 67 percent of adults. Majorities agree, regardless of party affiliation (73 percent Democrats, 64 percent independents, 55 percent Republicans). Among likely voters, 66 percent say a special election is a good idea. By comparison, just 40 percent of likely voters said in September 2005 that the special election called by Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger was a good idea, and 50 percent felt that way in the weeks before a 2009 special election called by the governor and Legislature.

A smaller majority — 53 percent of adults and 54 percent of likely voters — favor the general plan they would be voting on, which would extend tax and fee increases and divert some revenues from state to local governments.

Strong majorities (71 percent adults, 73 percent likely voters) favor the general concept of shifting tax dollars and fees to local governments to take on the responsibility of running certain programs. Californians favor the idea across party lines (73 percent Democrats, 72 percent Republicans, 68 percent independents) and demographic groups. Most residents are also confident (14 percent very confident, 49 percent somewhat confident) that local governments would be able to operate programs currently run by the state, and so are likely voters (18 percent very confident, 51 percent somewhat confident). Adults in the San Francisco Bay Area (69 percent) are the most likely and Los Angeles residents (59 percent) the least likely to express at least some confidence that their local governments would be able to take on these new responsibilities.

Most Californians (66 percent adults, 63 percent likely voters) favor Brown’s proposal to phase out funding for local redevelopment agencies and eliminate enterprise zones, redirecting tax revenue to local governments for schools and other services. His proposal to cut state worker pay by about 10 percent for those not covered under collective bargaining agreements has the support of 49 percent of adults and 55 percent of likely voters.

Brown Approval Rating Falls Short of 50 Percent

So far, Californians approve of the ideas the new governor has advanced more than they approve of the new governor. Less than half of adults approve of the overall job he is doing so far (41 percent approve, 19 percent disapprove, 39 percent don’t know) or of his handling of the state budget and taxes (41 percent approve, 27 percent disapprove, 32 percent don’t know). His approval ratings among likely voters are higher but still don’t reach 50 percent: His overall job approval is 47 percent (20 percent disapprove, 33 percent don’t know) and 47 percent approve of his handling of the budget and taxes (24 percent disapprove, 29 percent don’t know).

Most adults (55 percent) disapprove of the new Legislature — largely composed of incumbents. Likely voters are still more negative: 68 percent disapprove. The Legislature fares even more poorly on its handling of the budget and taxes: 65 percent of adults and 74 percent of likely voters disapprove.

Even though Californians give approval ratings of less than 50 percent to both the new Legislature and governor, a majority of adults — 58 percent — say the two will be able to work together and accomplish a lot in the next year. Among likely voters, 52 percent hold this view. By comparison, just 28 percent of all adults and 20 percent of likely voters felt this way in January 2010.

Most Would Pay Higher Taxes to Spare Schools

Most Californians regard the state budget as a big problem (68 percent adults, 83 percent likely voters). Solid majorities of adults oppose spending cuts in K-12 education (75 percent), higher education (63 percent), and health and human services (60 percent) to help reduce the state budget deficit. But 70 percent support cuts in prisons and corrections. Californians say they are willing to increase taxes to spare K-12 education (71 percent), higher education (59 percent), and health and human services (57 percent) from budget cuts. Just 17 percent are willing to pay higher taxes to maintain current funding for prisons and corrections.

Likely voters are less willing than Californians overall to pay higher taxes to maintain funding for K-12 education (62 percent), higher education (51 percent), and health and human services (46 percent). Only 14 percent would pay higher taxes to spare prisons and corrections.

How do Californians want to fill the state’s $25 billion budget gap? They are slightly more likely to prefer a mix of spending cuts and tax increases (42 percent) than to prefer filling the gap mainly through cuts (36 percent). Just 9 percent favor mainly tax increases; 7 percent say it would be okay to borrow money and run a deficit.

Residents are divided over who should make the tough choices involved in the state budget: 26 percent prefer Brown’s approach, 28 percent prefer that of the Democrats in the Legislature, and 26 percent prefer that of the Republicans in the Legislature. Among likely voters, 27 percent prefer Brown, 21 percent prefer legislative Democrats and 34 percent prefer legislative Republicans.

How to Raise Revenue? Most Would Raise Taxes for Corporations

Majorities (60 percent adults, 55 percent likely voters) favor raising the state taxes paid by California’s corporations to address the budget deficit, up 13 points among likely voters since last September. Other revenue-raising ideas received far less support: 27 percent of likely voters favor raising state personal income taxes, 34 percent favor raising the state sales tax on all purchases and 36 percent favor increasing the vehicle license fee.

Californians’ Knowledge Gap

Most Californians’ views about the budget are not based on an understanding of where the money comes from and where it goes. A majority of adults say they have some knowledge (39 percent) or a lot of knowledge (15 percent) about how state and local governments spend and raise money. But given a list of the four top state spending categories — K-12 public education, health and human services, higher education, and prisons and corrections — just 16 percent (22 percent likely voters) correctly name K-12 education as the area where the most money is spent. A plurality of adults (45 percent) and likely voters (41 percent) name prisons and corrections, which is actually fourth-largest. On the revenue side, just 29 percent of adults (33 percent likely voters) correctly name the personal income tax as the top source. Only 6 percent of adults and 9 percent of likely voters are able to identify both the state’s top area of spending and its top revenue source.

The Tax System: It Needs Changes, But It’s Moderately Fair

As Californians face the prospect of a special election to determine whether to extend temporary tax increases, most (58 percent) say the state and local tax system is in need of major changes. And 53 percent say they pay more in taxes to state and local governments than they should. Despite these attitudes about their own tax burden, most say the present state and local tax system is at least moderately fair (4 percent very fair, 53 percent moderately fair).

More Hopeful, Still Worried About Year Ahead

Californians are feeling better about the direction of the state and their own financial futures, but most are still not feeling good. A majority (54 percent) continue to say that things in California are going in the wrong direction. However, the share of those who see things going in the right direction — 38 percent — is up 22 points since October and the highest percentage since September 2007. Most independents (58 percent) and a large majority of Republicans (81 percent) remain pessimistic about the direction of the state. But for the first time since September 2007, Democrats are more likely to say the state is going in the right direction (51 percent) than in the wrong one (39 percent).

Turning to economic conditions in California, a majority of adults (56 percent) expect bad times financially in the next 12 months. But the percentage expecting good times — 36 percent — is up 11 points since October. Despite their sunnier view of the economic outlook, most (86 percent) still believe the state is in a recession, with 48 percent viewing it as a serious recession.

More Key Findings

» Jobs, economy, state budget top list of important issues: More adults (34 percent) name jobs and the economy than any other issue as the one state leaders should focus on. Among likely voters, a record-high 35 percent choose the state budget as the top issue.

» How big should government be? Californians split: About half (49 percent) of adults prefer to pay higher taxes for a government providing more services, while 46 percent prefer lower taxes and fewer services. Likely voters prefer lower taxes and fewer services (54 percent to 41 percent).

» Slim majority favors lowering the vote threshold for local special taxes: Fifty-three percent of adults (50 percent likely voters) say it would be a good idea to lower the two-thirds vote requirement to 55 percent for local special taxes. Strong majorities support strictly limiting the amount of state spending increases each year and increasing the size of the state’s rainy day fund.

About the Survey

The PPIC Statewide Survey has provided policymakers, the media and the general public with objective, advocacy-free information on the perceptions, opinions and public policy preferences of California residents since 1998. This survey is part of a series that examines the social, economic, and political trends that influence public policy preferences and ballot choices. It is supported with funding from the James Irvine Foundation.

Findings are based on a telephone survey of 2,004 California adult residents interviewed on landlines and cell phones Jan. 11-18. Interviews were conducted in English or Spanish according to respondents’ preferences. The sampling error, taking design effects from weighting into consideration, is plus or minus 3.5 percent for all adults, plus or minus 3.7 percent for the 1,365 registered voters, and plus or minus 4.2 percent for the 987 likely voters.

Click here to view the survey.

  • Ask
  • Vote
  • Investigate
  • Answer

Noozhawk Asks: What’s Your Question?

Welcome to Noozhawk Asks, a new feature in which you ask the questions, you help decide what Noozhawk investigates, and you work with us to find the answers.

Here’s how it works: You share your questions with us in the nearby box. In some cases, we may work with you to find the answers. In others, we may ask you to vote on your top choices to help us narrow the scope. And we’ll be regularly asking you for your feedback on a specific issue or topic.

We also expect to work together with the reader who asked the winning questions to find the answer together. Noozhawk’s objective is to come at questions from a place of curiosity and openness, and we believe a transparent collaboration is the key to achieve it.

The results of our investigation will be published here in this Noozhawk Asks section. Once or twice a month, we plan to do a review of what was asked and answered.

Thanks for asking!

Click here to get started >

Support Noozhawk Today

You are an important ally in our mission to deliver clear, objective, high-quality professional news reporting for Santa Barbara, Goleta and the rest of Santa Barbara County. Join the Hawks Club today to help keep Noozhawk soaring.

We offer four membership levels: $5 a month, $10 a month, $25 a month or $1 a week. Payments can be made through PayPal below, or click here for information on recurring credit-card payments.

Thank you for your vital support.

Reader Comments

Noozhawk is no longer accepting reader comments on our articles. Click here for the announcement. Readers are instead invited to submit letters to the editor by emailing them to [email protected]. Please provide your full name and community, as well as contact information for verification purposes only.

Daily Noozhawk

Subscribe to Noozhawk's A.M. Report, our free e-Bulletin sent out every day at 4:15 a.m. with Noozhawk's top stories, hand-picked by the editors.

Sign Up Now >