Friday, September 22 , 2017, 7:52 am | Fair 52º

 
 
 
 

Local News

Supervisors Vote to Put Adam’s Infrastructure Maintenance Proposal on June Ballot

Addressing a large backlog of projects, the ordinance would require Santa Barbara County to keep roads and facilities in the same or better condition

In a major achievement for Fourth District Supervisor Peter Adam, voters will be seeing a ballot measure authored by him in June, asking them to approve an item that would hold Santa Barbara County accountable for keeping roads and county facilities at least at the status quo in terms of maintenance.

The county Board of Supervisors voted Tuesday in favor of putting the item before voters in the election, but the three South County supervisors seemed to vote in favor "only because we have no other choice," said Doreen Farr, Third District supervisor.

Adam's office gathered more than 15,000 signatures in support of putting the item on the ballot, which moved the item forward outside of the decision of the supervisors.

The ordinance, which has become a signature issue for Adam during the short time he's been in office, seeks to address a huge backlog in Santa Barbara County's infrastructure needs, which has been estimated at $306 million in projects on the county’s roads, bridges and parks.

The ordinance requires the board to maintain all county facilities used by the public in a condition that is the same as or better than the condition they are in when the ordinance is passed. If the board decides to use debt to accomplish that, the ordinance states it would have to be approved by voters.

Maintaining infrastructure even in its current state would come at no small cost, as supervisors found out Tuesday during a presentation from staff with the county Public Works Department.

Currently the county invests $6 million in upkeep annually for parks and maintenance, and $24 total is needed. That leaves an $18 million gap, staff said.

But those are preliminary numbers — the full report on the cost to maintain county buildings and parks will be out later — and could be as much as $8 million more.

The ballot measure has had vocal criticism from First District Supervisor Salud Carbajal, who raised concerns Tuesday about taking money from other departments, such as public safety, construction of a new jail and public health departments.

"We will have challenges raising the money to operate our jail," he said. "Anybody that supports it just needs to know it could mean less cops, less firefighters.

"As long as we articulate that, I think it's a good thing. … We should not sugarcoat it."

Adam said the ordinance "identifies the goal but doesn't give you the means."

Public Works Director Scott McGolpin said that as the roads age and aren't maintained, they get exponentially more expensive to repair.

Matt Pontus of the General Services Department said the report on the county parks and facilities will be out in the spring and will look at the total cost to maintain the county's 500 facilities, including fire stations, jails, mental health facilities, parking lots and more.

The county could unload county facilities to save money or take on debt to fund the measure as well.

"It's going to be a long slog to figure out where the money's going to come from," Adam said. "But I think we can."

Carbajal called the measure "laudable but misguided."

"I'm going to dub this the anti-public safety net issue because that's exactly what's at stake here," he said, adding that he and Farr would author the ballot language against the measure.

Noozhawk staff writer Lara Cooper can be reached at [email protected]. Follow Noozhawk on Twitter: @noozhawk, @NoozhawkNews and @NoozhawkBiz. Connect with Noozhawk on Facebook.

  • Ask
  • Vote
  • Investigate
  • Answer

Noozhawk Asks: What’s Your Question?

Welcome to Noozhawk Asks, a new feature in which you ask the questions, you help decide what Noozhawk investigates, and you work with us to find the answers.

Here’s how it works: You share your questions with us in the nearby box. In some cases, we may work with you to find the answers. In others, we may ask you to vote on your top choices to help us narrow the scope. And we’ll be regularly asking you for your feedback on a specific issue or topic.

We also expect to work together with the reader who asked the winning questions to find the answer together. Noozhawk’s objective is to come at questions from a place of curiosity and openness, and we believe a transparent collaboration is the key to achieve it.

The results of our investigation will be published here in this Noozhawk Asks section. Once or twice a month, we plan to do a review of what was asked and answered.

Thanks for asking!

Click here to get started >

Support Noozhawk Today

You are an important ally in our mission to deliver clear, objective, high-quality professional news reporting for Santa Barbara, Goleta and the rest of Santa Barbara County. Join the Hawks Club today to help keep Noozhawk soaring.

We offer four membership levels: $5 a month, $10 a month, $25 a month or $1 a week. Payments can be made through PayPal below, or click here for information on recurring credit-card payments.

Thank you for your vital support.



Daily Noozhawk

Subscribe to Noozhawk's A.M. Report, our free e-Bulletin sent out every day at 4:15 a.m. with Noozhawk's top stories, hand-picked by the editors.

Sign Up Now >