Pixel Tracker

Wednesday, March 20 , 2019, 3:24 pm | Partly Cloudy 61º

 
 
 
 

Supervisors Deny Appeal of Santa Ynez Golden Inn & Village Development Revisions

The Santa Barbara County Board of Supervisors ordered the Golden Inn & Village development to make more adjustments to its lighting, but denied an appeal of the project approval that was filed by two neighbors.

Mark Brooks and Patti Stewart, residents of Lucky Lane near the development at 860 N. Refugio Road in Santa Ynez, have concerns about the sites's lighting and drainage, and appealed the county Planning Commission’s decision to approve development plan revisions. 

The Golden Inn & Village project completed affordable senior housing and family apartments on the site last year, and has a Phase 2 still to come with assisted-living and a memory-care facilities. 

The plans for the senior housing phase’s lighting and stormwater drainage were changed before construction, and the developers – including the Rona Barrett Foundation and the Housing Authority of the County of Santa Barbara and its project manager, RRM Design Group – went to the county afterward for approval on the changes.

The county Planning Commission approved lighting plan revisions at its Sept. 27, 2017, meeting, allowing the existing lighting, which is 20-foot-tall poles instead of the original plan’s 8-foot poles.

Neighbors have also been concerned about the project's drainage.

The development plans had included detaining some off-site stormwater, but it was dropped from construction after an engineer said it was a bad idea, according to Lisa Plowman of RRM Design Group.

“Unfortunately, the project approved was not the project that was built,” Stewart told the Board of Supervisors, calling the after-the-fact plan changes a bait and switch.

Plowman said the dark-sky lighting plan didn’t meet safety standards, and when the architecture firm made changes, they didn’t alert planning staff.

The 20-foot light poles were in the plans given permits and approval, but were apparently overlooked, and both Plowman and county planning staff said they take lessons away from the breakdowns in communication.

At the March 20 meeting, the Board of Supervisors voted unanimously to deny the appeal and uphold the project approval.

In the motion, supervisors also told Golden Inn & Village to change out one light pole for a motion sensor light, and add screening for the southernmost parking area, whether it is by landscaping or a wall.

Third District Supervisor Joan Hartmann asked developers and planning staff to think about lessons learned with this project, to avoid making the same mistakes.

“Government is only as good as the people who watch over it,” she said, addressing Brooks and Stewart, thanking them for their attention to the project.​

Noozhawk managing editor Giana Magnoli can be reached at .(JavaScript must be enabled to view this email address). Follow Noozhawk on Twitter: @noozhawk, @NoozhawkNews and @NoozhawkBiz. Connect with Noozhawk on Facebook.

Support Noozhawk Today!

Our professional journalists work tirelessly to report on local news so you can be more informed and engaged in your community. This quality, local reporting is free for you to read and share, but it's not free to produce.

You count on us to deliver timely, relevant local news, 24/7. Can we count on you to invest in our newsroom and help secure its future?

We provide special member benefits to show how much we appreciate your support.

Email
I would like give...
Great! You're joining as a Red-Tailed Hawk!
  • Ask
  • Vote
  • Investigate
  • Answer

Noozhawk Asks: What’s Your Question?

Welcome to Noozhawk Asks, a new feature in which you ask the questions, you help decide what Noozhawk investigates, and you work with us to find the answers.

Here’s how it works: You share your questions with us in the nearby box. In some cases, we may work with you to find the answers. In others, we may ask you to vote on your top choices to help us narrow the scope. And we’ll be regularly asking you for your feedback on a specific issue or topic.

We also expect to work together with the reader who asked the winning questions to find the answer together. Noozhawk’s objective is to come at questions from a place of curiosity and openness, and we believe a transparent collaboration is the key to achieve it.

The results of our investigation will be published here in this Noozhawk Asks section. Once or twice a month, we plan to do a review of what was asked and answered.

Thanks for asking!

Click Here to Get Started >

Reader Comments

Noozhawk is no longer accepting reader comments on our articles. Click here for the announcement. Readers are instead invited to submit letters to the editor by emailing them to [email protected]. Please provide your full name and community, as well as contact information for verification purposes only.