Thursday, June 21 , 2018, 5:55 am | Overcast 62º


Local News

County Supervisors Opt Not to Adopt Proposed Fracking Ban; Measure Will Go Before Voters

A proposed ban on hydraulic fracturing, acidizing and other oil-and-gas production operations will go to Santa Barbara County voters in November.

The Santa Barbara County Water Guardians gathered enough signatures to put the measure on the ballot, and the county Board of Supervisors decided Friday not to adopt the ban outright.

The board won’t take a position on the proposed ordinance, but individual members may be involved in ballot arguments on either side, as they were for Measure M.

Supervisors Peter Adam and Steve Lavagnino have already come out against it, saying they will work hard to make sure it’s defeated.

The initiative would ban so-called “high-intensity” petroleum operations: well-stimulation treatments such as hydraulic fracturing and acid treatments, and secondary or enhanced recovery operations that include methods such as cyclic steaming and the injection of water, wastewater or carbon dioxide produced during the course of oil operations.

If passed by voters, the measure would limit onshore operations in unincorporated areas of the county and would limit onshore production of offshore oil and gas reservoirs, according to the county counsel.

Santa Barbara County had 1,167 onshore wells operating last year, which produced 4.3 million barrels of oil — or 180.6 million gallons.

No local wells currently use hydraulic fracturing, also known as fracking, or the other well-stimulation treatments that would be banned by this proposed ordinance.

The county has had wells that were “fracked” in the past, but there have been no applications since 2011, when a “soft ban” was put in place with a strict application process, Lavagnino said.

However, 100 percent of active wells use at least one of the secondary or enhanced-recovery operation methods, at least for well maintenance, said Dennis Bozanich, assistant to the county executive officer.

Some of the methods that would be limited, such as injecting chemicals into a well, are used widely now for maintenance or for an enhanced production operation, county staff said. It all depends on whether it’s done under pressure.

The county has 903 anticipated wells in the pipeline, and 89 percent of them would use petroleum operations of the type described in the measure.

Existing wells would be allowed status-quo operations within their vested rights, and companies could apply for exemptions on a case-by-case basis, according to the proposed ordinance.

If this ordinance is approved by voters, the trend would go toward reduced petroleum production in the county over time, according to a county staff report.

The Auditor-Controller’s office will develop a fiscal-impact statement for the ballot materials, but said the oil production companies pay $16.4 million in local property taxes, which is 2.65 percent of the total tax roll.

Bozanich said the county also considered the broader impacts of the oil-and-gas industry, which were estimated at $291.4 million by the UCSB Economic Impact Project report. The industry also provides for an estimated 1.07 percent of the county’s jobs.

The supervisors had concerns with the staff report and didn’t file it, but decided to put the ordinance to voters instead of adopting it on Friday.

Before making the decision, 100 speakers from both sides addressed the board, which was meeting in Santa Maria.

Noozhawk news editor Giana Magnoli can be reached at .(JavaScript must be enabled to view this email address). Follow Noozhawk on Twitter: @noozhawk, @NoozhawkNews and @NoozhawkBiz. Connect with Noozhawk on Facebook.

Support Noozhawk Today

You are an important ally in our mission to deliver clear, objective, high-quality professional news reporting for Santa Barbara, Goleta and the rest of Santa Barbara County. Join the Hawks Club today to help keep Noozhawk soaring.

We offer four membership levels: $5 a month, $10 a month, $25 a month or $1 a week. Payments can be made through PayPal below, or click here for information on recurring credit-card payments.

Thank you for your vital support.

Become a Noozhawk Supporter

First name
Last name
Enter your email
Select your membership level

Payment Information

You are purchasing:

Payment Method

Pay by Credit Card:

Mastercard, Visa, American Express, Discover

Pay with Apple Pay or Google Pay:

Noozhawk partners with Stripe to provide secure invoicing and payments processing.

  • Ask
  • Vote
  • Investigate
  • Answer

Noozhawk Asks: What’s Your Question?

Welcome to Noozhawk Asks, a new feature in which you ask the questions, you help decide what Noozhawk investigates, and you work with us to find the answers.

Here’s how it works: You share your questions with us in the nearby box. In some cases, we may work with you to find the answers. In others, we may ask you to vote on your top choices to help us narrow the scope. And we’ll be regularly asking you for your feedback on a specific issue or topic.

We also expect to work together with the reader who asked the winning questions to find the answer together. Noozhawk’s objective is to come at questions from a place of curiosity and openness, and we believe a transparent collaboration is the key to achieve it.

The results of our investigation will be published here in this Noozhawk Asks section. Once or twice a month, we plan to do a review of what was asked and answered.

Thanks for asking!

Click Here to Get Started >

Reader Comments

Noozhawk is no longer accepting reader comments on our articles. Click here for the announcement. Readers are instead invited to submit letters to the editor by emailing them to [email protected]. Please provide your full name and community, as well as contact information for verification purposes only.

Daily Noozhawk

Subscribe to Noozhawk's A.M. Report, our free e-Bulletin sent out every day at 4:15 a.m. with Noozhawk's top stories, hand-picked by the editors.

Sign Up Now >