Saturday, July 21 , 2018, 4:32 am | Overcast 64º

 
 
 
 

Susan Estrich: Can a Massachusetts Liberal Be Nominated for President?

Could Elizabeth Warren be nominated for president? 

There are plenty of establishment Democrats who are worried. 

I know the answer: Yes.

Can a Massachusetts liberal win the general election? That's another question.

At the 1988 Democratic National Convention in Atlanta that nominated Massachusetts Gov. Michael Dukakis, a governor who will remain unnamed took me aside and warned me of the troubles ahead: People in his state, he said, think there are only two things that come from Massachusetts, liberals and lobsters, and by October, they were going to figure out that my guy was not a lobster.

Sadly, I knew the difference between winning a nomination and winning a general election.

A year before, when I took over the campaign, I was already a well-known "rules junkie" in Democratic circles, a veteran of two cycles and three campaigns, not to mention the rules fights at the 1980 convention and the two rules commissions that always followed our defeats.

I even coined the phrase "superdelegates" when, as a Kennedy shill, I opposed efforts by the Mondale people to create a new category of automatic, unpledged delegates.

My argument was that it would take control of the nomination process away from the women and minority voters and place it in the hands of the white, male, establishment types.

My "lead" was an assemblywoman from California named Maxine Waters. More familiar names: Harold Ickes (who, with a few others, was atop the Clinton campaign and White House) was a rules junkie; Tom Donilon (who has long been one of Joe Biden's closest advisers) was a rules junkie; Tad Devine (who ran Bernie Sanders' campaign) was a rules junkie extraordinaire.

There is a reason these names are familiar. They wrote the rules for the game. I was proud to make it into the group. In the fall of 1987, I was also teaching election law at Harvard, with a focus on the presidential primary system. I loved the stuff.

Bloated campaigns of overconfident frontrunners tend to blow up in Iowa, and the only issue is whether they can be saved in New Hampshire. On the other hand, an exciting activist ideologue who is not the favorite of the mainstream establishment can catch fire in Iowa, no matter how unelectable.

And a well-financed Massachusetts liberal can scrounge enough votes through a well-oiled ground game (a specialty of us Boston pols) to get the bronze, which is generally enough.

So if you have a lefty who is also a Massachusetts liberal, the only question will be how to avoid too much hype.

Poor Teddy, most beloved of Massachusetts liberals: He got all the hype and then had the bad luck to take on an incumbent president head-to-head on the eve of the Iran hostage crisis (he still got a third of the vote).

The minute the party ends, you get on that plane in Iowa and you fly home. Did I say "home"? Yes. I mean home.

For those not familiar with the area, southern New Hampshire, which is the most populous part of the state, and the most important in Democratic primaries, is a suburb of Massachusetts.

There is one network affiliate station in New Hampshire. If you want to reach voters in New Hampshire, you buy television in Boston. I remember going to a rally for John Kerry in New Hampshire in 2004, and every car had Massachusetts plates.

He was not lighting fires. Was it going to still work, I asked one of his people. It did. 

Once you leave New Hampshire, by now with even more money coming in, you can start picking out liberal states on the map with lots of delegates and announce that you are going to win here and there and there.

New York. California. Washington state. You can win in states that are unwinnable in the general election by playing to the ideologues — while the moderates keep dropping like flies.

Crazy system? Maybe.

But the only thing crazier than the Democrats' embrace of this system, which gives control of the selection of a nominee to the ideological activists, is that the Republicans have pretty much followed suit.

Susan Estrich is a best-selling author, the Robert Kingsley Professor of Law and Political Science at the USC Law Center and was campaign manager for 1988 Democratic presidential nominee Michael Dukakis. Click here to contact her or click here to read previous columns. The opinions expressed are her own.

Support Noozhawk Today

You are an important ally in our mission to deliver clear, objective, high-quality professional news reporting for Santa Barbara, Goleta and the rest of Santa Barbara County. Join the Hawks Club today to help keep Noozhawk soaring.

We offer four membership levels: $5 a month, $10 a month, $25 a month or $1 a week. Payments can be made through Stripe below, or click here for information on recurring credit-card payments and a mailing address for checks.

Thank you for your vital support.

Become a Noozhawk Supporter

First name
Last name
Enter your email
Select your membership level
×

Payment Information

You are purchasing:

Payment Method

Pay by Credit Card:

Mastercard, Visa, American Express, Discover
One click only, please!

Pay with Apple Pay or Google Pay:

Noozhawk partners with Stripe to provide secure invoicing and payments processing.

  • Ask
  • Vote
  • Investigate
  • Answer

Noozhawk Asks: What’s Your Question?

Welcome to Noozhawk Asks, a new feature in which you ask the questions, you help decide what Noozhawk investigates, and you work with us to find the answers.

Here’s how it works: You share your questions with us in the nearby box. In some cases, we may work with you to find the answers. In others, we may ask you to vote on your top choices to help us narrow the scope. And we’ll be regularly asking you for your feedback on a specific issue or topic.

We also expect to work together with the reader who asked the winning questions to find the answer together. Noozhawk’s objective is to come at questions from a place of curiosity and openness, and we believe a transparent collaboration is the key to achieve it.

The results of our investigation will be published here in this Noozhawk Asks section. Once or twice a month, we plan to do a review of what was asked and answered.

Thanks for asking!

Click Here to Get Started >

Reader Comments

Noozhawk is no longer accepting reader comments on our articles. Click here for the announcement. Readers are instead invited to submit letters to the editor by emailing them to [email protected]. Please provide your full name and community, as well as contact information for verification purposes only.

Daily Noozhawk

Subscribe to Noozhawk's A.M. Report, our free e-Bulletin sent out every day at 4:15 a.m. with Noozhawk's top stories, hand-picked by the editors.

Sign Up Now >