Monday, December 5 , 2016, 8:00 am | Fair 41º

 
 
 
 

Susan Estrich: Christoper Dorner’s Last Day and Its Impact on Los Angeles

My friends from out of town want to know what I thought of President Barack Obama’s State of the Union address last Tuesday. The answer is simple. I live in Los Angeles. I didn’t see or hear the State of the Union address. I was watching the Christopher Dorner manhunt.

In the days while Dorner was the most feared name in Los Angeles, my adopted city went through an emotional roller coaster: horror at the senseless murder of Monica Quan, a young basketball coach, and her fiancé, Keith Lawrence, a public safety officer at USC (where I teach and where it hit home hard) allegedly because Dorner was unsatisfied with her father’s defense of him at his Los Angeles Police Department disciplinary hearing; horror at the senseless and brutal killing of young Riverside police officer and former Marine Michael Crain; and sadness that some of what Dorner said in his manifesto about our police department took us way back, to the terrible days of the 1990s, to the Rodney King beating and the L.A. riots, to the acquittal of O.J. Simpson, who got away with murder by putting the LAPD on trial.

Was it even possible that anything this crazy, cruel, deranged murderer said could have any credence? Had we made so little progress?

Those last questions were being batted about, below the line, off the television cameras, during the weekend before Tuesday’s chase. The Los Angeles Times highlighted two stories on its front page: one about the murders in Irvine of the beautiful young couple; the other raising questions as to whether Dorner was, in fact, properly discharged, reviewing the testimony and concluding that it came down to a credibility contest.

The racial divide opened up again. Everyone condemns Dorner’s actions. There’s no dispute about that. But the fact that the LAPD shot at three totally innocent people, including a 71-year-old Hispanic woman and her daughter who were delivering newspapers in a blue Toyota, had many people muttering that maybe he was right about the department.

The fact that Dorner’s manifesto had nothing but praise for the military even as it damned the LAPD left a lot of folks shaking their heads. Not many people say such things aloud, or with their names attached. No one wants to be quoted showing sympathy for a cop-killer, nor do I have any. But the story is more complicated than a “simple” triple murder.

On Tuesday, a couple who owned a cabin in the Big Bear mountain resort area — just down the road from where police were staging the manhunt — entered the cabin to clean only to be confronted by Dorner. He bound and gagged them, but repeatedly assured them that he had nothing against them, that he would not harm them, that he was just trying to clear his name. Then he left the cabin and stole their car. Their 9-1-1 call led to the last stage of the manhunt, the murder of a sheriff’s deputy, the final shootout, the burning of a cabin, and the sigh of relief as the roads reopened.

It’s too bad, one African-American friend said to me, that he couldn’t find a way to draw attention to his complaints without committing murder. Yes. Beyond too bad. Tragic, for his victims.

Dorner did not clear his name. If that was his goal, he could not have chosen a worse way to accomplish it.

The errors in the manhunt — the fact that he was, as it is now being reported, “hiding in plain view” just down the road from the command post — will certainly raise issues about the way the search was conducted. But an examination of the legacy of the 1990s and to what extent the LAPD has changed will have to wait for another day.

At this point, no one wants to suggest that there is anything positive to be said about Christopher Dorner. I don’t know about the State of the Union, but my city has been through the wringer.

Susan Estrich is a best-selling author, the Robert Kingsley Professor of Law and Political Science at the USC Law Center and was campaign manager for 1988 Democratic presidential nominee Michael Dukakis. Click here to contact her or click here to read previous columns. The opinions expressed are her own.

Reader Comments

Noozhawk's intent is not to limit the discussion of our stories but to elevate it. Comments should be relevant and must be free of profanity and abusive language and attacks.

By posting on Noozhawk, you:

» Agree to be respectful. Noozhawk encourages intelligent and impassioned discussion and debate, but now has a zero-tolerance policy for those who cannot express their opinions in a civil manner.

» Agree not to use Noozhawk’s forums for personal attacks. This includes any sort of personal attack — including, but not limited to, the people in our stories, the journalists who create these stories, fellow readers who comment on our stories, or anyone else in our community.

» Agree not to post on Noozhawk any comments that can be construed as libelous, defamatory, obscene, profane, vulgar, harmful, threatening, tortious, harassing, abusive, hateful, sexist, racially or ethnically objectionable, or that are invasive of another’s privacy.

» Agree not to post in a manner than emulates, purports or pretends to be someone else. Under no circumstances are readers posting to Noozhawk to knowingly use the name or identity of another person, whether that is another reader on this site, a public figure, celebrity, elected official or fictitious character. This also means readers will not knowingly give out any personal information of other members of these forums.

» Agree not to solicit others. You agree you will not use Noozhawk’s forums to solicit and/or advertise for personal blogs and websites, without Noozhawk’s express written approval.

Noozhawk’s management and editors, in our sole discretion, retain the right to remove individual posts or to revoke the access privileges of anyone who we believe has violated any of these terms or any other term of this agreement; however, we are under no obligation to do so.

Support Noozhawk Today

You are an important ally in our mission to deliver clear, objective, high-quality professional news reporting for Santa Barbara, Goleta and the rest of Santa Barbara County. Join the Hawks Club today to help keep Noozhawk soaring.

We offer four membership levels: $5 a month, $10 a month, $25 a month or $1 a week. Payments can be made through PayPal below, or click here for information on recurring credit-card payments.

Thank you for your vital support.



Daily Noozhawk

Subscribe to Noozhawk's A.M. Report, our free e-Bulletin sent out every day at 4:15 a.m. with Noozhawk's top stories, hand-picked by the editors.

Sign Up Now >