Thursday, February 22 , 2018, 12:29 pm | Fair 60º

 
 
 
 

Susan Estrich: Filibuster’s Death Is a Real Low Point for Example of Democracy

In the past two weeks, three highly qualified candidates for the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit found themselves blocked because Senate Republicans would not allow their nominations to be voted on. The reason had nothing to do with their qualifications. It was pure partisan politics: an effort by Republicans to limit the power that the president has, under the Constitution no less, to appoint members of the federal judiciary. The three were appointed to fill open seats. The court they were appointed to serve on is powerful. So Republicans said no.

And then Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid, D-Nev., said no even louder, and action that had been threatened for years by leaders from both sides was voted on. The rules by which the Senate has operated were changed. There will be no more filibusters, save for nominees to the U.S. Supreme Court.

The good news is that the three qualified nominees will now get a vote and be confirmed.

The bad news is that the Senate is no longer a functioning institution.

It is not a happy day.

What goes around will almost surely come around. Everyone knows that. No one was celebrating. Everyone is to blame. It's an ugly game, and it needed to end.

This time it was Republicans blocking Democrats. Last time it was and next time it may be Democrats who are shut out.

The new rules don't fix things. Quite the contrary. The new rules were made because members of the Senate, supposedly "leaders" of this country, could not come together to solve the problem. They could not get along. They could not find common ground.

So from now on, they won't even try.

Pitiful. Just pitiful.

The advantage of the old system was that it gave the power to those in the middle, expected them to be able to work across party lines, insisted that they figure out how to get along — at least when the majority has fewer than 60 seats.

It demanded of senators a kind of maturity, a breadth of perspective, a commitment to compromise that old-fashioned folks like myself think of as the essence of politics, the lifeblood of democracy.

Oh, I can tell stories, like old-timers do, of how Sen. Strom Thurmond, R-S.C., agreed to allow the nomination of Stephen Breyer (then my boss on the Senate Judiciary Committee) to the Court of Appeals to go forward — even though Democrats had just lost both the Senate and the White House. But Thurmond respected Breyer's brilliance and fairness and integrity as the committee's chief counsel, and he and the committee's chair, Sen. Ted Kennedy, D-Mass., worked together, just as Kennedy did in later days with Sen. Orrin Hatch, R-Utah.

Those guys were "big" — and I'm not talking height and weight. They were men of real stature.

I was just a kid. I thought being in the Senate was a big deal. I looked up to these men.

Sure, there are some very able men and women in the Senate today. I have no doubt that they love their country as much as their predecessors did. But even the best of them end up getting infected by the partisan poison that has gripped our politics and ultimately paralyzed the Senate. I'm not even surprised anymore when a senator tells me (after years of incessant fundraising and endless travel and campaigning) that they actually "hate" their job, that getting up and going to work every morning is miserable because they don't get anything done.

So if you can't fix what's broken, you change the rules and move on.

And here's the worst of it. There are real ideological differences between Democrats and Republicans, legitimate divides. But those divides are nothing compared to what folks face around the globe, where divisions are measured in decades of war and violence and hatred. And if we can't be a model for the world, if compromise is too hard for 100 men and women who have far more in common, then what does that say about democracy?

Susan Estrich is a best-selling author, the Robert Kingsley Professor of Law and Political Science at the USC Law Center and was campaign manager for 1988 Democratic presidential nominee Michael Dukakis. Click here to contact her or click here to read previous columns. The opinions expressed are her own.

  • Ask
  • Vote
  • Investigate
  • Answer

Noozhawk Asks: What’s Your Question?

Welcome to Noozhawk Asks, a new feature in which you ask the questions, you help decide what Noozhawk investigates, and you work with us to find the answers.

Here’s how it works: You share your questions with us in the nearby box. In some cases, we may work with you to find the answers. In others, we may ask you to vote on your top choices to help us narrow the scope. And we’ll be regularly asking you for your feedback on a specific issue or topic.

We also expect to work together with the reader who asked the winning questions to find the answer together. Noozhawk’s objective is to come at questions from a place of curiosity and openness, and we believe a transparent collaboration is the key to achieve it.

The results of our investigation will be published here in this Noozhawk Asks section. Once or twice a month, we plan to do a review of what was asked and answered.

Thanks for asking!

Click here to get started >

Support Noozhawk Today

You are an important ally in our mission to deliver clear, objective, high-quality professional news reporting for Santa Barbara, Goleta and the rest of Santa Barbara County. Join the Hawks Club today to help keep Noozhawk soaring.

We offer four membership levels: $5 a month, $10 a month, $25 a month or $1 a week. Payments can be made through PayPal below, or click here for information on recurring credit-card payments.

Thank you for your vital support.



Reader Comments

Noozhawk is no longer accepting reader comments on our articles. Click here for the announcement. Readers are instead invited to submit letters to the editor by emailing them to [email protected]. Please provide your full name and community, as well as contact information for verification purposes only.

Daily Noozhawk

Subscribe to Noozhawk's A.M. Report, our free e-Bulletin sent out every day at 4:15 a.m. with Noozhawk's top stories, hand-picked by the editors.

Sign Up Now >