Saturday, July 21 , 2018, 6:16 pm | Fair 71º


Susan Estrich: Florida’s Favorite Sons

The news reports earlier this week that Jeb Bush's super PAC is ready to go after his former protege, Marco Rubio, come as no surprise.

With Donald Trump hitting a ceiling and Ben Carson risking his credibility and trustworthiness in a fight with the media, the focus is finally shifting to the "real" candidates, and the question of who is going to emerge as the alternative to Jeb Bush in that crowd seems to have been answered, at least for now.

It's Marco Rubio. 

Bush aides are reported to be enraged at Rubio's rise, while the Rubio folks point out, as Rubio himself has, that Bush liked him just fine until he decided to run against him.

Indeed, Jeb Bush even said that Rubio had the intelligence and acumen to be president (presumably so long as Bush wasn't running against, too).

Not everyone is in favor of Bush's PAC going hard negative, with some supporters claiming that such an attack would be "beneath" the Bush family.

Ha! The Bush family is about winning, and if the Willie Horton "independently sponsored" ads didn't prove that in 1988, surely the "independent" Swift Boat ads in 2004 did. These folks have always played hardball, and there's no reason to think Jeb, as he watches his once front-running campaign lose steam, will do any differently.

But will the negative attacks move primary voters to Bush, or just poison general election voters on Rubio?

One of Rubio's major vulnerabilities in a general election will be the absolute rigidity of his anti-abortion position: he does not support any exception, even in cases of rape or incest. Will pointing that out hurt Rubio in the primaries or help him?

Rubio missed critical votes in Congress because he was campaigning, but that's an argument that rarely packs much of a punch. Then there's the matter of Rubio's personal finances, but Rubio will no doubt claim any attacks on that front are simply parroting Democratic talking points.

If the Bush PACs don't go on the offensive now, you can be sure that the Democratic super PACs will go after Rubio with guns blazing and red phones ringing next year. 

When the matter of Rubio's inexperience is raised, members of his camp are quick to point out that Rubio's time in the Senate exceeds Barack Obama's, but that is not necessarily a great defense; even many Democrats admit privately that Obama might have had an easier time of it had he been more experienced.

Rubio has a story to tell, that's true, but in the context of immigration politics, his story ends in the wrong place — absolutist opposition — for the overwhelming majority of Hispanic voters.

Bush is far more moderate on the subject, more measured, exactly what a candidate should be to win in November 2016, although it's a different story in the primaries.

That's what must be most frustrating for the Bush camp. They remain certain that their guy, not Rubio, would be the strongest candidate against Hillary Clinton in the general election. He might be.

The strongest primary candidate might be too ideological, too "hot," for a general election, for all the same reasons he's strongest in the primaries. While boring doesn't work in primaries, it can spell "safe" in a general election.

The problems Bush has been having this year aren't really ideological. His aides and their strategic decisions aren't the problem, either. No, the problem has been Bush himself.

He has not been connecting. In debate after debate, in interview after interview, he seems more frustrated than energized, as if he should not have to work this hard, as if his opponents are not worthy of him or have no business challenging him.

It's not so much that Rubio is winning as it is that Bush is losing. Maybe it's a communications problem, which is what aides are no doubt saying. What else can you say?

The one thing you can't change in a campaign is the candidate, and when there's a candidate problem that's bigger than ideology or competence, you just can't win. 

Susan Estrich is a best-selling author, the Robert Kingsley Professor of Law and Political Science at the USC Law Center and was campaign manager for 1988 Democratic presidential nominee Michael Dukakis. Click here to contact her or click here to read previous columns. The opinions expressed are her own.

Support Noozhawk Today

You are an important ally in our mission to deliver clear, objective, high-quality professional news reporting for Santa Barbara, Goleta and the rest of Santa Barbara County. Join the Hawks Club today to help keep Noozhawk soaring.

We offer four membership levels: $5 a month, $10 a month, $25 a month or $1 a week. Payments can be made through Stripe below, or click here for information on recurring credit-card payments and a mailing address for checks.

Thank you for your vital support.

Become a Noozhawk Supporter

First name
Last name
Enter your email
Select your membership level

Payment Information

You are purchasing:

Payment Method

Pay by Credit Card:

Mastercard, Visa, American Express, Discover
One click only, please!

Pay with Apple Pay or Google Pay:

Noozhawk partners with Stripe to provide secure invoicing and payments processing.

  • Ask
  • Vote
  • Investigate
  • Answer

Noozhawk Asks: What’s Your Question?

Welcome to Noozhawk Asks, a new feature in which you ask the questions, you help decide what Noozhawk investigates, and you work with us to find the answers.

Here’s how it works: You share your questions with us in the nearby box. In some cases, we may work with you to find the answers. In others, we may ask you to vote on your top choices to help us narrow the scope. And we’ll be regularly asking you for your feedback on a specific issue or topic.

We also expect to work together with the reader who asked the winning questions to find the answer together. Noozhawk’s objective is to come at questions from a place of curiosity and openness, and we believe a transparent collaboration is the key to achieve it.

The results of our investigation will be published here in this Noozhawk Asks section. Once or twice a month, we plan to do a review of what was asked and answered.

Thanks for asking!

Click Here to Get Started >

Reader Comments

Noozhawk is no longer accepting reader comments on our articles. Click here for the announcement. Readers are instead invited to submit letters to the editor by emailing them to [email protected]. Please provide your full name and community, as well as contact information for verification purposes only.

Daily Noozhawk

Subscribe to Noozhawk's A.M. Report, our free e-Bulletin sent out every day at 4:15 a.m. with Noozhawk's top stories, hand-picked by the editors.

Sign Up Now >