Pixel Tracker

Wednesday, November 21 , 2018, 7:30 am | Mostly Cloudy 55º


Susan Estrich: Is GOP ‘Concern’ for Obama’s Security Partisan Politics As Usual?

When you hear Rep. Darrell Issa, R-Calif., one of President Barack Obama’s harshest Republican critics in the House of Representatives, demanding to know whether Obama is safe, it’s tempting to believe that, at least for a moment, partisan politics has been put to one side in what should be a united and nonpolitical commitment to the safety of our president and his family.

Tempting — but like so much in Washington, there seems to be no escaping the politics.

Democrats are worrying out loud — which is to say on television and in print — that the Republicans will (and are) using the security lapses as one more opportunity to paint the Obama administration as incompetent. The media have spent almost as much time, or more, on the politics, as they have been trying to figure out what the real problems are. A “​two-fer” — that’s what one Democrat called it in The New York Times, describing the politics and meaning that Republicans get to sound off on security (a serious and important topic) and make the Obama administration the target of their attacks, even if it was Obama and his family who were potentially at risk.

Yes, it’s true that Obama appointed the head of the Secret Service, Julia Pierson, three years ago. But he hardly instructed her to cut corners on his safety or that of his wife and children. And yet there was the White House press secretary (the day before Pierson resigned) seeking to deflect aggressive questioning about who knew what and when — as if Obama were trying to understate or dismiss or downplay an issue where he, quite literally, is the one with the most to lose.

Pierson had to go because, as the Greeks say, the fish rots from the head, and when you’re the head of an agency that has been publicly humiliated, you go.

That doesn’t mean the security breaches were the product of anything she did, let alone the fault of Obama or his party. Presidents are loath to criticize the Secret Service for many reasons, including that these are the men and women who risk their lives to protect the president and his family and are with them 24/7.

The president’s security is an American issue, not a Democratic or Republican one. So is the arrival of Ebola, not only in the form of one case in America, but also in the outbreaks in cities across Africa with no capacity to handle it. So is the spread of Islamic extremism, and campus sexual assault and virtually every other issue that anyone — and I mean anyone who isn’t playing politics inside the Beltway — worries about.

Try this test. Pick up your local paper and tell me: How many of the issues that people in your community are concerned about are “partisan” issues? We may have different approaches, but outside of Washington, they rarely bear a party label. What to do, we ask each other, and shake our heads. Oh, my goodness, we say, when we hear that the president’s house — or our next-door neighbor’s — was broken into.

Of course, this is an election season, and a host of close races may end up deciding who controls the Senate, which may end up determining who serves as attorney general and who is appointed to other key positions. Elections matter. There are differences between the candidates. But what the security breach — like the awful beheadings, like the spread of Ebola — should remind us is that most of the problems that rightly concern and even terrify us are not caused by partisan politics and will not be solved by partisan politics.

Susan Estrich is a best-selling author, the Robert Kingsley Professor of Law and Political Science at the USC Law Center and was campaign manager for 1988 Democratic presidential nominee Michael Dukakis. Click here to contact her or click here to read previous columns. The opinions expressed are her own.

Support Noozhawk Today

You are an important ally in our mission to deliver clear, objective, high-quality professional news reporting for Santa Barbara, Goleta and the rest of Santa Barbara County. Join the Hawks Club today to help keep Noozhawk soaring.

We offer four membership levels: $5 a month, $10 a month, $25 a month or $1 a week. Payments can be made using a credit card, Apple Pay or Google Pay, or click here for information on recurring credit-card payments and a mailing address for checks.

Thank you for your vital support.

Become a Noozhawk Supporter

First name
Last name
Select your monthly membership
Or choose an annual membership

Payment Information

Membership Subscription

You are enrolling in . Thank you for joining the Hawks Club.

Payment Method

Pay by Credit Card:

Mastercard, Visa, American Express, Discover
One click only, please!

Pay with Apple Pay or Google Pay:

Noozhawk partners with Stripe to provide secure invoicing and payments processing.
You may cancel your membership at any time by sending an email to .(JavaScript must be enabled to view this email address).

  • Ask
  • Vote
  • Investigate
  • Answer

Noozhawk Asks: What’s Your Question?

Welcome to Noozhawk Asks, a new feature in which you ask the questions, you help decide what Noozhawk investigates, and you work with us to find the answers.

Here’s how it works: You share your questions with us in the nearby box. In some cases, we may work with you to find the answers. In others, we may ask you to vote on your top choices to help us narrow the scope. And we’ll be regularly asking you for your feedback on a specific issue or topic.

We also expect to work together with the reader who asked the winning questions to find the answer together. Noozhawk’s objective is to come at questions from a place of curiosity and openness, and we believe a transparent collaboration is the key to achieve it.

The results of our investigation will be published here in this Noozhawk Asks section. Once or twice a month, we plan to do a review of what was asked and answered.

Thanks for asking!

Click Here to Get Started >

Reader Comments

Noozhawk is no longer accepting reader comments on our articles. Click here for the announcement. Readers are instead invited to submit letters to the editor by emailing them to [email protected]. Please provide your full name and community, as well as contact information for verification purposes only.