Wednesday, May 23 , 2018, 4:19 pm | Overcast 64º


Susan Estrich: A President Bernie Not Likely, But Hillary Needs to Heal Herself

President Bernie?


For Sen. Bernie Sanders, along with surprise hit of the summer season Donald Trump, some people are really beginning to ask: could it happen? 

Could Sanders win Iowa? He could.

Mike Huckabee, who had launched his Republican presidential campaign on a weight-loss platform (I was a fan), won Iowa, everyone spent the whole night figuring out how much it would hurt Mitt Romney (answer: a lot) and help John McCain (ditto).

Could Sanders win New Hampshire? I guess he could.

Indeed, he could do well enough that even in losing, he embarrasses Hillary Clinton, or worse.

Those of us old enough (in my case, barely, of course) will remember that Eugene McCarthy lost the New Hampshire Democratic Party primary to President Lyndon Johnson, but his showing was strong enough that Johnson pulled out of the race.

At that point, McCarthy did not become the favorite for the nomination — far from it. He was an unwilling and unwitting stalking horse.

When Johnson bowed out, Sen. Robert F. Kennedy and Vice President Hubert Humphrey jumped in. The fight for the nomination ended with a shot fired at Kennedy in the kitchen of the Ambassador Hotel in Los Angeles on his way to claim victory in the California primary.

No one knows what might have happened in a different 1968 matchup, but we know exactly what happened in the actual one: Humphrey, like McCarthy, did not become President. Richard Nixon, the former vice president, did.

I don’t know any political hacks (other than those on the payroll) who think it likely that the Democrats will nominate an independent senator from Vermont who will be a much tougher sell in a general election than in the early contests, which are always dominated by activists.

The harder question that people are asking is: what does this say about Hillary Clinton? How could it be that the first woman to stand a real chance of becoming president is neck-and-neck with Bernie Sanders?

What does it say that so many Democrats — Democrats of the activist persuasion — would be against Clinton?

Are they really voting for Sanders or is it instead a vote against Clinton?

Clinton has not had a great month. The old rule for handling a crisis like the email server one was to put all the information, every last scrap of it that you could, including every classified email and State Department document, out at once. Total transparency.

In this scenario, Clinton would stand up and take responsibility, say that given her past she had concerns about privacy but that she should never have allowed any business to be done on her home server; that she tried her best to ensure that no classified information was ever on the server, and is troubled to learn that there are, however, many incidents in which she was sent classified material.

Then she would let the media ask whatever they want, and then it’s out, it’s over, you’ve done what people want, which is to take responsibility and own up to your mistakes, and it’s over. That’s the old rule. Think, if you are old enough, of Geraldine Ferraro in 1984.

The exception, of course, is when the admission — if it came in the heat of the moment — would create a wave of momentum that would push you out of the race or out of office, so you have to stonewall and hope the other side overreaches and people get tired of the story. Think Monica Lewinsky.

I just don’t think there’s a smoking gun hiding in the emails.

If there is, there won’t be a nomination; winning an office is harder than not losing it, and the only question will be: who jumps in?

The Democratic race could get as crowded as the Republican race in no time, but I just don’t see it.

I fear that Clinton really doesn’t think she did anything wrong and resents the politicization of her privacy by Republicans who will use anything against her, all of which is true (even paranoid people have real enemies), but it’s the least attractive memory of the Clinton years, and not one to call up.

This is not a “right-wing conspiracy” so much as it is a self-inflicted wound that it is not too late to treat and heal.

Susan Estrich is a best-selling author, the Robert Kingsley Professor of Law and Political Science at the USC Law Center and was campaign manager for 1988 Democratic presidential nominee Michael Dukakis. Click here to contact her or click here to read previous columns. The opinions expressed are her own.

Support Noozhawk Today

You are an important ally in our mission to deliver clear, objective, high-quality professional news reporting for Santa Barbara, Goleta and the rest of Santa Barbara County. Join the Hawks Club today to help keep Noozhawk soaring.

We offer four membership levels: $5 a month, $10 a month, $25 a month or $1 a week. Payments can be made through PayPal below, or click here for information on recurring credit-card payments.

Thank you for your vital support.

Become a Supporter

Enter your email
Select your membership level

Payment Information

You are purchasing:

Payment Method

Pay by Credit Card:

Mastercard, Visa, American Express, Discover

Pay with Apple Pay or Google Pay:

Noozhawk partners with Stripe to provide secure invoicing and payments processing.

  • Ask
  • Vote
  • Investigate
  • Answer

Noozhawk Asks: What’s Your Question?

Welcome to Noozhawk Asks, a new feature in which you ask the questions, you help decide what Noozhawk investigates, and you work with us to find the answers.

Here’s how it works: You share your questions with us in the nearby box. In some cases, we may work with you to find the answers. In others, we may ask you to vote on your top choices to help us narrow the scope. And we’ll be regularly asking you for your feedback on a specific issue or topic.

We also expect to work together with the reader who asked the winning questions to find the answer together. Noozhawk’s objective is to come at questions from a place of curiosity and openness, and we believe a transparent collaboration is the key to achieve it.

The results of our investigation will be published here in this Noozhawk Asks section. Once or twice a month, we plan to do a review of what was asked and answered.

Thanks for asking!

Click Here to Get Started >

Reader Comments

Noozhawk is no longer accepting reader comments on our articles. Click here for the announcement. Readers are instead invited to submit letters to the editor by emailing them to [email protected]. Please provide your full name and community, as well as contact information for verification purposes only.

Daily Noozhawk

Subscribe to Noozhawk's A.M. Report, our free e-Bulletin sent out every day at 4:15 a.m. with Noozhawk's top stories, hand-picked by the editors.

Sign Up Now >