Pixel Tracker

Thursday, December 13 , 2018, 5:09 pm | Fair 62º

 
 
 
 

Susan Estrich: The Question of Respect

I left the University of Southern California forum where I watched the debate Monday night with an overwhelming sense of unease. And I've been trying to figure out why.

I've been to debates where my candidate did great and debates where my candidate did not; I've been to debates where I can't even remember what city I was in, much less what anybody said.

I would have to say that most debates don't move numbers or decide elections, no matter how big a deal the media makes of them, because most people leave supporting the same candidate they supported coming in.

I wrote a book called "The Case for Hillary Clinton" 10 years ago. I guess you might call me an "early adopter."

I thought she did an excellent job on Monday: She was well-prepared and articulate, which everyone expects and she gets little credit for, but also appeared warm, smiling and nice — which she actually is, but often doesn't seem to be.

If you went into the debate supporting Clinton, you left with a smile.

And Donald Trump? Trump was Trump. He got a small loan of $14 million (what would that be in today's dollars? I wonder) to start a business. Is that small?

He'll release his taxes someday. He'll give folks like himself a big tax cut that will boost the economy. Rosie O'Donnell is a "pig."

Even if you've never seen a single episode of "The Apprentice," just from watching the debate you can understand why the Donald has been the most popular and enduring star in reality television, why he would even presume to think he could trademark as his own the expression "You're fired." His favorite.

It wasn't just that he made factual mistakes on Monday. Anyone can do that. What bothered me is that he didn't care, not one bit.

It's now been more than 20 years since I got an emergency call one day from the director of the Reagan Library asking if I could please pinch hit for a missing panelist on a program the next day to be headlined by the new speaker of the House, Newt Gingrich.

I immediately agreed. I remembered the close relationship President Reagan had with my congressman, former Speaker Tip O'Neill. Those were the days when Republicans and Democrats fought all day and then raised a glass together at night.

Those were the days when politics was fun, and executions and public humiliations of candidates and staff were not daily events.

People even actually talked about policy. And there was this idea we all seemed to share about respect for the presidency.

Sitting on the panel that day, as the lone woman and the lone Democrat, I was asked to compare then-President Bill Clinton, who had exactly one supporter in the room (me), with Ronald Reagan.

So I went to what I considered the safest space in our land: respect for the presidency.

I talked about the fact that I did not agree with President Reagan on many issues, but I respected him as president and believed such respect to be an essential element of our democracy, one that I hoped we could share in both Republican and Democratic administrations.

Nancy Reagan, one of the most gracious ladies I have met, sitting in the front row, led the applause of the dignitaries joining her there.

Everyone else in the room booed me. Loudly. On C-SPAN, no less. I couldn't believe it. Nancy Reagan sent me flowers and apologized.

No one apologized for Trump's disrespect Monday night.

It wasn't what he got wrong or didn't know or wouldn't do. It was that he very clearly didn't take the debate the least bit seriously. He made fun of his rival for preparing. She turned it on him, but my stomach still turned.

They may not decide elections — although on occasion they do — but televised presidential debates have been a fundamental aspect of our democracy for the last half-century. To give them less attention than the taping of an "Apprentice" episode betrays a lack of respect that goes to the core of Trump's character.

Susan Estrich is a best-selling author, the Robert Kingsley Professor of Law and Political Science at the USC Law Center and was campaign manager for 1988 Democratic presidential nominee Michael Dukakis. Click here to contact her or click here to read previous columns. The opinions expressed are her own.

Support Noozhawk Today

You are an important ally in our mission to deliver clear, objective, high-quality professional news reporting for Santa Barbara, Goleta and the rest of Santa Barbara County. Join the Hawks Club today to help keep Noozhawk soaring.

We offer four membership levels: $5 a month, $10 a month, $25 a month or $1 a week. Payments can be made using a credit card, Apple Pay or Google Pay, or click here for information on recurring credit-card payments and a mailing address for checks.

Thank you for your vital support.

Become a Noozhawk Supporter

First name
Last name
Email
Select your monthly membership
Or choose an annual membership
×

Payment Information

Membership Subscription

You are enrolling in . Thank you for joining the Hawks Club.

Payment Method

Pay by Credit Card:

Mastercard, Visa, American Express, Discover
One click only, please!

Pay with Apple Pay or Google Pay:

Noozhawk partners with Stripe to provide secure invoicing and payments processing.
You may cancel your membership at any time by sending an email to .(JavaScript must be enabled to view this email address).

  • Ask
  • Vote
  • Investigate
  • Answer

Noozhawk Asks: What’s Your Question?

Welcome to Noozhawk Asks, a new feature in which you ask the questions, you help decide what Noozhawk investigates, and you work with us to find the answers.

Here’s how it works: You share your questions with us in the nearby box. In some cases, we may work with you to find the answers. In others, we may ask you to vote on your top choices to help us narrow the scope. And we’ll be regularly asking you for your feedback on a specific issue or topic.

We also expect to work together with the reader who asked the winning questions to find the answer together. Noozhawk’s objective is to come at questions from a place of curiosity and openness, and we believe a transparent collaboration is the key to achieve it.

The results of our investigation will be published here in this Noozhawk Asks section. Once or twice a month, we plan to do a review of what was asked and answered.

Thanks for asking!

Click Here to Get Started >

Reader Comments

Noozhawk is no longer accepting reader comments on our articles. Click here for the announcement. Readers are instead invited to submit letters to the editor by emailing them to [email protected]. Please provide your full name and community, as well as contact information for verification purposes only.