Pixel Tracker

Thursday, December 13 , 2018, 10:04 am | Fair 55º

 
 
 
 

Tajiguas Landfill Resource Recovery Project Stalled After Technical Planning Error

Santa Barbara County’s $111 million resource-recovery project at the Tajiguas Landfill has hit a roadblock after the county discovered a technical planning error in its documents.

Earlier this year, county Public Works staff realized they had used an incorrect boundary for the coastal zone, the carefully protected and well-regulated strip of land along the coast.

Development projects in the area are subject to extra scrutiny and requirements, and the mistake has stalled the financing process.

“Staff and project partners are working diligently to move the project forward,” county spokeswoman Gina DePinto said in a statement. “The team is working on several options seeking the most expedient and appropriate course that will bring the project into successful completion.”

A Public Works memorandum from Feb. 2 obtained by the Gaviota Coast Conservancy noted the discrepancy was discovered at the end of January, and that the state boundary is 300 to 400 feet further north than the line the county used.

As state pollution standards tighten, the Resource Recovery Project is intended to divert more incoming waste from the landfill, lengthening Tajiguas’ currently nine-year lifespan along the way.

The project will have two facilities: One will sort recyclables and organic waste from all trash arriving at the landfill, and the other will convert organic waste into compostable materials and biogas, the latter of which will be used to generate electricity.

Thirty percent of waste processed in the materials-recovery facility would continue into the organic-waste-digester facility, another 30 percent will emerge as recyclables, and the other 40 percent will end up in the landfill itself.

The county says the reduced greenhouse gas emissions will be the equivalent of taking 22,000 vehicles off the road every year.

The “state of the art” facilities are expected to extend Tajiguas’ lifespan by 12 years.

Officials say the Tajiguas Resource Recovery Project is a key method of achieving county and state energy and climate standards, and uses the best available technology to meet local waste disposal needs when no other facility exists that can handle the waste load.

Last July, the county Board of Supervisors approved a contract with MSB Investors LLC to design, build and operate the facilities on the site of the landfill. Santa Barbara, Goleta, Solvang and Buellton are also contributing to the project.

The TRRP has been the subject of fierce opposition from many environmentalists who charge that it represents the continued industrialization of the Gaviota Coast.

Environmental groups also have raised concerns about the reliability of the anaerobic digestion technology and the prudence of publicly financing such an expensive project.

“A trash processing plant is a bad idea anywhere on the Gaviota Coast,” said Marc Chytilo, an environmental law attorney who represents the Gaviota Coast Conservancy.

“This is a biodiverse region of global significance, whose natural and cultural resources qualify it as suitable to be a National Seashore,” he said. “It should not house a garbage dump at all, much less be the location for a massive new industrial trash processing facility.”

Opponents have argued that pursuing better, more ambitious recycling programs years ago would have avoided the need to extend the facility’s lifespan.

After hearing of the planning error, Gaviota Coast Conservancy chairman Ed Easton asserted that “the TRRP is dead in the water.”

DePinto called the GCC’s assessment an “unfortunate misstatement.”

“In the next 45 days, we hope to have a preliminary analysis completed and be able to give a more comprehensive update that includes a new timeline for the project,” she said.

“County staff will evaluate options and then resume the bond offer (for financing). One of the paths forward being considered is moving a portion of the facility further inland on county property.”

Asked whether the county is confident the TRRP will move forward sooner or later, she said, “definitely.”

Noozhawk staff writer Sam Goldman can be reached at .(JavaScript must be enabled to view this email address). Follow Noozhawk on Twitter: @noozhawk, @NoozhawkNews and @NoozhawkBiz. Connect with Noozhawk on Facebook.

Support Noozhawk Today

You are an important ally in our mission to deliver clear, objective, high-quality professional news reporting for Santa Barbara, Goleta and the rest of Santa Barbara County. Join the Hawks Club today to help keep Noozhawk soaring.

We offer four membership levels: $5 a month, $10 a month, $25 a month or $1 a week. Payments can be made using a credit card, Apple Pay or Google Pay, or click here for information on recurring credit-card payments and a mailing address for checks.

Thank you for your vital support.

Become a Noozhawk Supporter

First name
Last name
Email
Select your monthly membership
Or choose an annual membership
×

Payment Information

Membership Subscription

You are enrolling in . Thank you for joining the Hawks Club.

Payment Method

Pay by Credit Card:

Mastercard, Visa, American Express, Discover
One click only, please!

Pay with Apple Pay or Google Pay:

Noozhawk partners with Stripe to provide secure invoicing and payments processing.
You may cancel your membership at any time by sending an email to .(JavaScript must be enabled to view this email address).

  • Ask
  • Vote
  • Investigate
  • Answer

Noozhawk Asks: What’s Your Question?

Welcome to Noozhawk Asks, a new feature in which you ask the questions, you help decide what Noozhawk investigates, and you work with us to find the answers.

Here’s how it works: You share your questions with us in the nearby box. In some cases, we may work with you to find the answers. In others, we may ask you to vote on your top choices to help us narrow the scope. And we’ll be regularly asking you for your feedback on a specific issue or topic.

We also expect to work together with the reader who asked the winning questions to find the answer together. Noozhawk’s objective is to come at questions from a place of curiosity and openness, and we believe a transparent collaboration is the key to achieve it.

The results of our investigation will be published here in this Noozhawk Asks section. Once or twice a month, we plan to do a review of what was asked and answered.

Thanks for asking!

Click Here to Get Started >

Reader Comments

Noozhawk is no longer accepting reader comments on our articles. Click here for the announcement. Readers are instead invited to submit letters to the editor by emailing them to [email protected]. Please provide your full name and community, as well as contact information for verification purposes only.

Daily Noozhawk

Subscribe to Noozhawk's A.M. Report, our free e-Bulletin sent out every day at 4:15 a.m. with Noozhawk's top stories, hand-picked by the editors.

Sign Up Now >