Sunday, February 25 , 2018, 8:12 pm | Fair 50º

 
 
 
 
Advice

Ted Rall: Carly Fiorina, Identity Politics and the Death of Feminism

If you doubt that the politics of identity have triumphed over the debate over ideas, read the New York Times story about how Carly Fiorina both repels and enthralls liberal feminists.

Identity politics is the marketing of and resulting support of candidates based upon their historically underprivileged status. Never mind what I believe or claim I'll do if I win.

Vote for me, gay males, because I am one of you! Vote for me, black women, because it's time for a black woman!

Also: Vote for me, black men, because I'm black (and also a woman).

Or: Vote for me, white liberals, because I'll heal the rifts of sexism and/or racism.

Barack Obama is the patron saint of modern identity politics. Though not black in a typical American sense, which indicates slave ancestry, Obama swept to victory twice and enjoyed remarkable deference from the media because he was black enough to serve as a symbol of racial reconciliation.

Identity politics is how he convinced most Democrats to vote for him and do so enthusiastically — this despite a conservative voting record and politics that would have been at home in any of several Republican administrations.

Obama's ideas — expanding NSA surveillance of American civilians, drone assassinations of thousands of innocent people, reducing Libya and Syria to failed states — are anathema to those who voted for him, but he was (sort of) black, so they did anyway.

This campaign season, it's the women's turn.

Hillary Clinton's conservative politics, ideas and performance are overlooked by the vast majority of her liberal supporters because she's a woman, and there needs to be a woman president, and if she falls short of victory, who is the next woman capable of pulling it off?

As the Times notes, feminists — most of whom are, by definition, politically liberal or progressive — are confused by the disconnect between Carly Fiorina's projection of strong, competent womaness and her retrograde right-wing politics.

"Can you love a campaign but hate a candidate's politics?" the paper quotes self-described feminist writer Robin Marty, writing for Cosmopolitan's website.

I dunno, Robin — can you be a feminist and still write for a rag that makes millions by reselling the same tired list of cheap orgasm tricks?

Can I admire Adolf Hitler's design sense while mourning the fact that no one managed to assassinate him?

In the crucible of the 1970s, identity politics had its place. Where would feminism have been without the identifier of Ms. Magazine?

Trans people, the latest to step out of the shadows of historical marginalization and oppression, have gotten where they are today via an identity politics that, first things first, made it OK to be proud of who and what you are.

But that was then and this is now. Now identity politics is all identity, no politics, all image, no substance.

Erin Gloria Ryan of Jezebel's quotes illustrate the bankruptcy of identity politics.

"Carly Fiorina is an ice-cold shade queen debate princess and I'm in love with and terrified of her," she tweeted.

Would a resident of Waziristan write: "Barack Obama is an ice-cold drone killer and I'm in love with his suits but not so much into being droned?"

No. He would not. Because a resident of Waziristan is connected to his class interests. Because he is scared of, and disgusted by, Obama's drones, he cannot appreciate the way the president cuts a fine figure in a suit.

It's of course ridiculous when you think about it, but it really does come down to aesthetics for Ryan: Fiorina, she says, is "contrary to the conservative female narrative, the way she looks, the way she presents herself, the no-nonsense businesswoman thing."

For this generation of image feminists, Fiorina is seductive because she cuts a fine figure in a high-end corporate outfit and refuses to absorb Donald Trump's cheap shots at her looks.

Too bad she wants to tell pregnant teenagers tough beans, they have to have the baby — and that she brazenly lied about a purported Planned Parenthood "harvest the brain" video.

Marty compares "liberal" feminist interest in Fiorina to eating at McDonald's: "You know, inherently, it's not something you should be eating. But when there's nothing else around, it's what you go and take."

That's so wrong in so many ways.

In the 2016 presidential race, there is another woman running. I think Clinton's politics are repugnant. There is no way I'd vote for her.

But if you roll lesser-evil style, she's obviously better from a progressive viewpoint than Fiorina  — like going to Wendy's instead of Mickey D's.

But lesser evil-ism, that bastard cousin of identity politics, is the first express stop on the road to ideological ruin.

Bernie Sanders — old and white and male — is 50 times the feminist than Hillary Clinton will ever be. I know because I've read his platform, which would do a lot more than Clinton, and a zillion times more than Carly Fiorina, to help women.

And that's leaving out the world where feminism should inhabit: the perfect ideal of total gender equality.

We're not going to get to equality under this variety of capitalism, or any other kind of capitalism. How can an identity politics that distracts real live feminists with the likes of a corporate monster like Carly Fiorina even start to destroy and replace the entire system?

Ted Rall is the political cartoonist for ANewDomain.net, editor of SkewedNews.net, a syndicated columnist and author of Snowden, a biography of NSA whistleblower Edward Snowden. Click here to contact him, and follow him on Twitter: @TedRall. The opinions expressed are his own.

  • Ask
  • Vote
  • Investigate
  • Answer

Noozhawk Asks: What’s Your Question?

Welcome to Noozhawk Asks, a new feature in which you ask the questions, you help decide what Noozhawk investigates, and you work with us to find the answers.

Here’s how it works: You share your questions with us in the nearby box. In some cases, we may work with you to find the answers. In others, we may ask you to vote on your top choices to help us narrow the scope. And we’ll be regularly asking you for your feedback on a specific issue or topic.

We also expect to work together with the reader who asked the winning questions to find the answer together. Noozhawk’s objective is to come at questions from a place of curiosity and openness, and we believe a transparent collaboration is the key to achieve it.

The results of our investigation will be published here in this Noozhawk Asks section. Once or twice a month, we plan to do a review of what was asked and answered.

Thanks for asking!

Click here to get started >

Support Noozhawk Today

You are an important ally in our mission to deliver clear, objective, high-quality professional news reporting for Santa Barbara, Goleta and the rest of Santa Barbara County. Join the Hawks Club today to help keep Noozhawk soaring.

We offer four membership levels: $5 a month, $10 a month, $25 a month or $1 a week. Payments can be made through PayPal below, or click here for information on recurring credit-card payments.

Thank you for your vital support.



Reader Comments

Noozhawk is no longer accepting reader comments on our articles. Click here for the announcement. Readers are instead invited to submit letters to the editor by emailing them to [email protected]. Please provide your full name and community, as well as contact information for verification purposes only.

Daily Noozhawk

Subscribe to Noozhawk's A.M. Report, our free e-Bulletin sent out every day at 4:15 a.m. with Noozhawk's top stories, hand-picked by the editors.

Sign Up Now >