Saturday, June 23 , 2018, 7:57 am | Fog/Mist 61º

 
 
 
 

Ted Rall: How I Learned That The Courts Are Off-Limits

I'm suing the Los Angeles Times. I'm the plaintiff. I'm the one who was wronged.

But this is America.

Deep-pocketed defendants like the Times are taking advantage of America's collapsing court system to turn justice on its head. In worn-out Trump-era America, the corruption and confusion that used to be associated with the developing world has been normalized.

If you're a big business, you may be the defendant on paper but you have all the advantages in court. Your money allows you to put the plaintiff on the defense.

You're equal in the eyes of the law — theoretically. But it doesn't feel like justice when the victim has to defend himself from the criminal.

It's like that song "Lola," in which the Kinks sang "girls will be boys and girls will be boys"; the courts system is a mixed up, muddled up, shook up world.

States like California passed anti-SLAPP laws to defend individuals with modest incomes (like me) against deep-pocked plaintiffs (like the Times) that file frivolous lawsuits to intimidate and harass their critics.

After an anti-SLAPP motion is filed, the case freezes until a judge decides whether the case is meritorious. If the judge says it's frivolous, it's dismissed and the poor individual defendant gets his or her attorney's fees paid by the deep-pocked corporation plaintiff.

After I sued them for defamation and wrongful termination, the Times filed three "anti-SLAPP" motions against me. So if the judge decides I don't have a good case, this middle-class individual plaintiff will have to pay the deep-pocketed defendant's legal fees.

Talk about topsy-turvy! The legislature should fix this law but they won't because there's zero political movement in that direction.

I may be the only journalist to have criticized anti-SLAPP laws in a public forum. Articles about anti-SLAPP feature nothing but praise.

There were three motions. I lost one on June 21, against the individual Times employees and executives involved in libeling me. (I plan to appeal.)

That loss prompted a parting of ways with my attorneys. What followed was a month of representing myself pro se (in California they call it in pro per).

I now have new lawyers, and we're waiting to hear how I did arguing against anti-SLAPP motions in LA Superior Court on July 14. It sucked.

But representing myself gave me a full-immersion crash course in just how messed up the courts really are.

The big thing I learned was that poor people have zero access to justice.

Nor do the middle class.

After the June 21 debacle, a semi-retired lawyer friend advised me to file a motion for reconsideration, a request to the judge to take another look and perhaps realize that he made some mistakes. The law gives you 10 days to file.

My motion for reconsideration was one of numerous motions I would have to draft and file myself while pro se. It was incredibly expensive, wildly burdensome and so daunting I bet 99 percent of people without a lawyer would throw up their hands and give up.

I'm the one percent.

I'm a writer. I went to an Ivy League school; I was a history major, so I'm good at research.

I used to work at a bank, where I worked on legal documents, so I'm familiar with legalese. So I researched what works and doesn't work in a motion for reconsideration. I crafted an argument. I deployed the proper tone using the right words and phrases.

Most people, not having the necessary skills or educational attainment, wouldn't stand a prayer of writing a legal brief like this motion. Mine may fail — but the judge might read it and take it seriously because it's written correctly.

I called the court clerk to ask how to file my motion. She was incredibly curt and mean. I'm a New Yorker so I persisted, but I could imagine other callers being put off and forgetting the whole thing.

Schedule a date for your hearing on the court's website, the clerk told me. Good luck! The site had an outdated interface, was loaded with arcane bureaucratic jargon and a design that's byzantine and hard to navigate.

If English is your second language, forget it.

Eventually I found the place to reserve a hearing date — where I learned about the filing fee.

Payable only by credit card.

No debit cards.

No Amex.

Protracted litigation against a well-funded adversary easily require dozens of filing fees. The poor need not apply.

Most Americans don't have that kind of money. And what about people who scrape up the dough but don't have plastic?

I paid the fee, printed out the receipt as required, stapled it to the back of my multiple required copies of the motion and went to the courthouse to file it. As I waited to have my motions stamped by a clerk, I studied the many working-class people waiting in the same line.

Here too, there is no consideration for the people. The clerk's office is open Monday to Friday 8:30 to 4:30. Most people work during those hours.

Gotta file something? You have to take time off. Parking? Expensive and far away.

I have a dream.

I dream of a court system dedicated to equal justice before the law — where anyone can file a motion, where there are no filing fees, where the courthouse is open on weekends, where you can file motions by uploading them online and there's free parking for citizens conducting business in the people's house.

Ted Rall is the author of Bernie, a biography written with the cooperation of Democratic presidential candidate Bernie Sanders. His next book, the graphic biography Trump, comes out July 19 and is now available for pre-order. Click here to contact him, and follow him on Twitter: @TedRall. Click here for previous columns. The opinions expressed are his own.

Support Noozhawk Today

You are an important ally in our mission to deliver clear, objective, high-quality professional news reporting for Santa Barbara, Goleta and the rest of Santa Barbara County. Join the Hawks Club today to help keep Noozhawk soaring.

We offer four membership levels: $5 a month, $10 a month, $25 a month or $1 a week. Payments can be made through PayPal below, or click here for information on recurring credit-card payments.

Thank you for your vital support.

Become a Noozhawk Supporter

First name
Last name
Enter your email
Select your membership level
×

Payment Information

You are purchasing:

Payment Method

Pay by Credit Card:

Mastercard, Visa, American Express, Discover

Pay with Apple Pay or Google Pay:

Noozhawk partners with Stripe to provide secure invoicing and payments processing.

  • Ask
  • Vote
  • Investigate
  • Answer

Noozhawk Asks: What’s Your Question?

Welcome to Noozhawk Asks, a new feature in which you ask the questions, you help decide what Noozhawk investigates, and you work with us to find the answers.

Here’s how it works: You share your questions with us in the nearby box. In some cases, we may work with you to find the answers. In others, we may ask you to vote on your top choices to help us narrow the scope. And we’ll be regularly asking you for your feedback on a specific issue or topic.

We also expect to work together with the reader who asked the winning questions to find the answer together. Noozhawk’s objective is to come at questions from a place of curiosity and openness, and we believe a transparent collaboration is the key to achieve it.

The results of our investigation will be published here in this Noozhawk Asks section. Once or twice a month, we plan to do a review of what was asked and answered.

Thanks for asking!

Click Here to Get Started >

Reader Comments

Noozhawk is no longer accepting reader comments on our articles. Click here for the announcement. Readers are instead invited to submit letters to the editor by emailing them to [email protected]. Please provide your full name and community, as well as contact information for verification purposes only.

Daily Noozhawk

Subscribe to Noozhawk's A.M. Report, our free e-Bulletin sent out every day at 4:15 a.m. with Noozhawk's top stories, hand-picked by the editors.

Sign Up Now >