Monday, July 16 , 2018, 2:37 am | Fair 66º

 
 
 
 

Ted Rall: The Good, The Bad and The Ugly — Hillary Clinton Edition

Last week, I handicapped the Bernie Sanders campaign. He since pulled off an upset in the Iowa Caucus, where he overcame a 40-point lead by Hillary Clinton to a virtual tie so even that coin tosses and bureaucratic incompetence may have made a difference.

It's a two-person race, with Clinton still in the lead, but Sanders has momentum and enthusiasm. Can the Independent Senator from Vermont catch up?

Democratic primaries are a referendum on the status quo, so Sanders's chances depend at least as much on Secretary Clinton's weaknesses as on his strengths.

Here's what Clinton has going for — and against — her.

The Good

As in her run against Obama, Clinton's strategists are selling competence and experience. "A progressive who gets things done," she is calling herself.

Scratch a little, however, and there's precious little evidence of substantial things she actually got done. Googling phrases like "Hillary Clinton's biggest accomplishments" yields lists that include "most-traveled secretary of state" and "gave a speech in Geneva standing up for gay rights."

Clinton's "achievements" are activities, not accomplishments.

Fortunately for her, most voters don't question the Been Everywhere, Done Everything meme. She does have quite a resume: First Lady, Senator, Secretary of State. Though, for the life of me, I don't understand why Sanders' Mayor, Congressman and Senator resume (longer in total, more re-elections) doesn't count.

When you talk to people who are seriously considering casting their votes for Clinton, many say they like that she's a woman president straight out of central casting — tough and strong, with the slightly dystopian Corporate Leader wardrobe to boot. Here's to you, Jodie Foster in Elysium.

Clinton knows everyone in D.C., she knows world leaders. She won't need months to settle into the White House.

The Bad

This is an anti-establishment year. Donald Trump, Ted Cruz and Sanders are benefitting from an electorate whose simmering disappointment over the replacement of Hope and Change in 2008 with the Too Big To Fail bank bailouts of 2009 is finally being articulated into rage at the ballotbox.

As Obama's cabinet member, that's on Clinton.

She can't run away from her Beltway insiderdom. To her credit, she isn't trying. To the contrary, she's hugging Obama and using head-over-heart rhetoric as hard as she can.

She's just the wrong candidate for this year, which means that if she wins the nomination she'll go into the general election campaign as bruised by Bernie Sanders as Jimmy Carter was in 1980 after facing off against Ted Kennedy.

Many Sanders Democrats will sit on their hands in November if she's the nominee.

Clinton isn't stupid. She knows her formidable organizational advantages — cash, a Super PAC, party backing, endorsements by establishment organizations including trade unions and corporate media, which have enforced a blackout of Sanders coverage — no longer guarantee her once "inevitable" campaign, so she's co-opting Sanders' positions on health care and other issues of interest to progressives.

Problem is, voters usually pick pure steak over mystery meat.

The Ugly

Obama's famous 2008 slight that Clinton was "likeable enough" turns out not to be so true. On the campaign trail and on TV, Clinton is charmless. She can't up her personality game.

With the liberal base of Clinton's party agitated at 1960s levels, she can't explain away her conservative record. She's never met a free trade deal or a war she didn't like.

She says she's been fighting for progressive causes for years, but when? Where? Even on the social "wedge" issues that her husband relied upon as president, she's in trouble.

Gays won't forget her support of the Defense of Marriage Act. Straights think she's a reed in the political wind.

But Clinton's biggest flaw as a candidate isn't policy. It's her failure to internalize two truisms of politics.

Number one: Candidates win by projecting an optimistic vision of the future. When she criticizes Sanders for advocating changes that would be hard to get through Congress and expensive to pay for — free college tuition, Medicare for everybody — she projects a radical pessimism that makes many ask, why not? Why can't the country that invades everyone, that sent a man to the moon, provide the same social benefits as most other nations?

And number two: Elections aren't about the candidate. They're about the people. This goes back to when tribes elected chiefs. Vote for me, and buffalo will rain from the sky! We'll be fat! Water everywhere! That's a winning campaign — not, hey, as the first elder from the Whatever Clan to become chief, I'd make tribal history and wouldn't that be cool.

Obama didn't win in 2008 by running as Future First Black President. He projected a sunny, winning disposition and a sense of the future we could buy into. Hope! Change! Yes We Can! Clinton's campaign is all about her, not us.

That's political suicide.

Ted Rall is the political cartoonist for ANewDomain.net, editor of SkewedNews.net, a syndicated columnist and author of Snowden, a biography of NSA whistleblower Edward Snowden. Click here to contact him, and follow him on Twitter: @TedRall. The opinions expressed are his own.

Support Noozhawk Today

You are an important ally in our mission to deliver clear, objective, high-quality professional news reporting for Santa Barbara, Goleta and the rest of Santa Barbara County. Join the Hawks Club today to help keep Noozhawk soaring.

We offer four membership levels: $5 a month, $10 a month, $25 a month or $1 a week. Payments can be made through Stripe below, or click here for information on recurring credit-card payments and a mailing address for checks.

Thank you for your vital support.

Become a Noozhawk Supporter

First name
Last name
Enter your email
Select your membership level
×

Payment Information

You are purchasing:

Payment Method

Pay by Credit Card:

Mastercard, Visa, American Express, Discover
One click only, please!

Pay with Apple Pay or Google Pay:

Noozhawk partners with Stripe to provide secure invoicing and payments processing.

  • Ask
  • Vote
  • Investigate
  • Answer

Noozhawk Asks: What’s Your Question?

Welcome to Noozhawk Asks, a new feature in which you ask the questions, you help decide what Noozhawk investigates, and you work with us to find the answers.

Here’s how it works: You share your questions with us in the nearby box. In some cases, we may work with you to find the answers. In others, we may ask you to vote on your top choices to help us narrow the scope. And we’ll be regularly asking you for your feedback on a specific issue or topic.

We also expect to work together with the reader who asked the winning questions to find the answer together. Noozhawk’s objective is to come at questions from a place of curiosity and openness, and we believe a transparent collaboration is the key to achieve it.

The results of our investigation will be published here in this Noozhawk Asks section. Once or twice a month, we plan to do a review of what was asked and answered.

Thanks for asking!

Click Here to Get Started >

Reader Comments

Noozhawk is no longer accepting reader comments on our articles. Click here for the announcement. Readers are instead invited to submit letters to the editor by emailing them to [email protected]. Please provide your full name and community, as well as contact information for verification purposes only.

Daily Noozhawk

Subscribe to Noozhawk's A.M. Report, our free e-Bulletin sent out every day at 4:15 a.m. with Noozhawk's top stories, hand-picked by the editors.

Sign Up Now >