Pixel Tracker

Tuesday, November 20 , 2018, 8:06 pm | Fair 52º

 
 
 
 

Trent Benedetti: Beware the Climate Change Carnival Coming to Town

Who has not heard the carnival barker entreating passersby to step right up to this attraction or that?

Carnival attractions come in many forms, but they all have two things in common: they cost money and they are shamelessly hyped. The more shameless the hype, the more money the carnival operator is able to extract from ... ahem ... the gullible.

The mother of carnivals recently concluded in Paris. It was the 2015 Paris Climate Conference, or COP21 (shorthand for the 21st Conference Of the Parties).

Oh, boy. If we were truly worried about global warming, they would stop holding these events because of the hot air they generate.

COP21 was an ostentatious spectacle that cost a mountain of money. Admittedly, it had entertainment value.

It entertained those who attended (probably at someone else’s expense) with the latest dreams, schemes and shenanigans to separate people from their money. Otherwise, the opulent extravaganza accomplished nothing.

The hype leading up to COP21 focused on the goal of achieving for the first time a binding climate agreement among all nations. It did not happen.

Of course, some will claim it did. Those making that claim are probably the same people who previously claimed certain islands in the Pacific were going to sink, islands that are still high and dry.

COP21 may sink Santa Barbara County, figuratively speaking — sink it under a deluge of the dire and dubitable. Our local carnival barkers will be shilling the latest regulation, rule or tax aimed at saving the world from the looming climate catastrophe being wrought by man-made CO2.

Anyone who questions whether the world actually needs saving will be attacked and unmercifully bludgeoned with sanctimonious claims to the effect that everything climate alarmists say is “settled science.”

Only card-carrying climate carnies make such claims. All reputable scientists reject such ridiculous assertions because science is a never-ending process. By definition, it is never settled.

There are some settled facts.

One, our climate comes from the dynamic interaction of many factors within a complex system consisting of five major components: lithosphere, hydrosphere, cryosphere, biosphere and atmosphere.

Two, our atmosphere contains many different elements. Carbon dioxide, or CO2, is one. CO2 comprises approximately .04 percent (400 parts per million) of the atmosphere. Man is responsible for approximately 16 of the 400 parts; the rest occur naturally.

In other words, man-made CO2 comprises a very small portion of the atmosphere, and atmosphere makes up only a fraction of the climate equation.

There is nothing wrong with scientific study of climate, what affects it and how. There is nothing wrong with common-sense measures to reduce man-made CO2 in the atmosphere.

But something is wrong with dogmatically continuing to make one tiny variable within a very challenging equation the sole focus of the remarkably arrogant, seemingly never-ending, often quoted and up-to-now always wrong predictions about disastrous global warming.

Wrong like the claims about a binding worldwide climate agreement being reached at COP21; wrong like the claims about sinking islands; and, wrong — repeatedly wrong — about predictions of runaway warming.

The predictions were so wrong for so long, the term “global warming” was discarded for the much more flexible term, “climate change.” It was hucksterism at its best because no one will argue against climate change?

Climate change is an incontrovertible fact. Sometimes the world warms, sometimes it cools. Knowing why it does what it does is complicated. That is a reality.

Here is another reality: climate alarmists are carnies at heart. They can’t help it. It is who they are. Therefore, they hype and try to separate you from your money.

Enjoy the carnival. Just don’t be taken in.

— Trent Benedetti is a member of the board of directors of the Committee to Improve North County and a longtime local business owner. Click here to read previous columns. The opinions expressed are his own.

Support Noozhawk Today

You are an important ally in our mission to deliver clear, objective, high-quality professional news reporting for Santa Barbara, Goleta and the rest of Santa Barbara County. Join the Hawks Club today to help keep Noozhawk soaring.

We offer four membership levels: $5 a month, $10 a month, $25 a month or $1 a week. Payments can be made using a credit card, Apple Pay or Google Pay, or click here for information on recurring credit-card payments and a mailing address for checks.

Thank you for your vital support.

Become a Noozhawk Supporter

First name
Last name
Email
Select your monthly membership
Or choose an annual membership
×

Payment Information

Membership Subscription

You are enrolling in . Thank you for joining the Hawks Club.

Payment Method

Pay by Credit Card:

Mastercard, Visa, American Express, Discover
One click only, please!

Pay with Apple Pay or Google Pay:

Noozhawk partners with Stripe to provide secure invoicing and payments processing.
You may cancel your membership at any time by sending an email to .(JavaScript must be enabled to view this email address).

  • Ask
  • Vote
  • Investigate
  • Answer

Noozhawk Asks: What’s Your Question?

Welcome to Noozhawk Asks, a new feature in which you ask the questions, you help decide what Noozhawk investigates, and you work with us to find the answers.

Here’s how it works: You share your questions with us in the nearby box. In some cases, we may work with you to find the answers. In others, we may ask you to vote on your top choices to help us narrow the scope. And we’ll be regularly asking you for your feedback on a specific issue or topic.

We also expect to work together with the reader who asked the winning questions to find the answer together. Noozhawk’s objective is to come at questions from a place of curiosity and openness, and we believe a transparent collaboration is the key to achieve it.

The results of our investigation will be published here in this Noozhawk Asks section. Once or twice a month, we plan to do a review of what was asked and answered.

Thanks for asking!

Click Here to Get Started >

Reader Comments

Noozhawk is no longer accepting reader comments on our articles. Click here for the announcement. Readers are instead invited to submit letters to the editor by emailing them to [email protected]. Please provide your full name and community, as well as contact information for verification purposes only.