Wednesday, November 14 , 2018, 7:54 am | Fair 45º

 
 
 
 

UCSB Evolutionary Biologist Stephen Proulx Co-Authors Study on Maternal Effects of Nematodes

Stephen Proulx (Sonia Fernandez / The UCSB Current photo)

Thank your mothers: a research collaboration between UC Santa Barbara and L’École Normale Supérieure in Paris has proven that deterministic maternal effects can give offspring a better start on life.

“It’s the first observation of experimental evolution of a maternal effect in response to a changing environment,” said UCSB evolutionary biologist Stephen Proulx, an author of the article, which appears in PLOS Biology.

The results of the study, which involved the evolution of a tiny hermaphroditic worm, shed light on strategies employed by organisms in response to changes in their habitats.

Unlike genotypic effects, which dictate traits in offspring based on inherited genes, parental (in this case, maternal) effects influence offspring phenotypes (physical traits) during embryonic development.

From the point of view of the developing embryo, Proulx said, these traits depend on the quality of their environment as they grow and develop.

In mammals, for instance, the mother’s body size and nutritional status will affect her growing fetus’ size. Her ability to transfer nutrients or secrete one hormone or another during pregnancy also affects the offspring’s development.

“In mammals, the placenta is an organ for maternal effects,” said Proulx. As the organ through which nutrients, hormones and waste pass between mother and fetus, the placenta and its health and functioning have a direct impact on the baby’s development.

In a wider sense, mom’s own genetics — which also dictate her body size, health and other things that could affect her developing infant — contribute to maternal effects.

“There are whole papers written on ‘What do we mean when we say maternal effect,’” Proulx said of the ongoing effort to fully define the phenomenon.

As part of natural selection, these influences, which may be randomized or deterministic, can be evolutionary strategies that benefit individuals and affect species survival.

Variations in traits within even the same generation and same family may be direct responses to the environment experienced by the mother or the egg and could, with optimal timing, ensure that offspring are specifically better adapted to the environment they could experience (deterministic).

Other maternal effects could ensure that at least a few of several siblings will live to adulthood, given traits rather more arbitrarily provided to them (randomized) that could increase their chances of survival, also known as “bet hedging.”

“The idea of bet hedging is that if the environment is unpredictable then you might produce a variety of offspring that could do well in various environments because you can adjust the concentration of different resources,” Proulx said.

Taken from gambling, bet hedging essentially attempts to decrease the chance of a complete loss of offspring, however some of the population is expected to do poorly or not survive.

For all the theory, however, a direct demonstration of the benefit of maternal effects has been missing, according to the researchers.

Enter Caenorhabditis elegans, a tiny hermaphroditic nematode with a short developmental cycle, the ability to easily produce many offspring and a fully mapped genome.

To study the type and impact of maternal effects under varying environmental conditions, Parisian collaborators Snighadip Dey and Henrique Teotónio subjected generations of the worm to different patterns of normal oxygen conditions (normoxia) and low-oxygen environments (anoxia), while the nematodes were still in the egg stage, and then monitored the traits produced in the offspring for 60 generations.

They found that when the environment changed in a predictable manner — in this case, alternated every generation between anoxic and normoxic embryonic development — mothers that had experienced normoxic conditions early on tended to provision their young (which were oxygen-deprived as embryos) with more glycogen, in effect equipping the embryos with tools to survive the stress of oxygen deprivation.

“Maybe it just means that a gene got turned on when mom was developing herself that then causes more glycogen to get put into each egg,” Proulx said of the adaptation. “What’s really cool is that this is a seven-day life cycle so mom experienced normoxia as an embryo and then five days later, when she goes to lay her own eggs, she adjusts how much glycogen gets put in it. This is a memory that lasts basically her whole life span, that affects how she provisions her offspring.”

In contrast, added Proulx, it didn’t work the other way: The non-oxygen-deprived offspring of mothers who experienced anoxia as eggs did not fare any worse despite the mother’s early “memory” of no oxygen.

Additionally, over the course of the experimental evolution, there also developed a trade-off between fertility and hatchability in predictable-environment offspring that had survived anoxia: while fewer eggs were laid by them as adults, the likelihood of survival of the eggs that were laid, their hatchability, increased.

Meanwhile, in the unpredictable scenarios in which the anoxic and normoxic conditions fluctuated between successive generations, bet-hedging would have been the expected strategy to deploy for survival.

“Under the random unpredictable conditions, we didn’t see an increase in offspring survivorship in either normoxic or anoxic environments,” Proulx said. “We didn’t see the evolution of bet-hedging, which could have happened, and it’s something we originally expected might happen.”

Lack of this development across successive generations suggests that randomized maternal effects are not only less common, they are also less environment-responsive and perhaps only on rare occasions do they lead to adaptations to fluctuating environments.

On the other hand, the study suggests also that once deterministic maternal effects have evolved, they could be adaptive to a variety of fluctuating environments.

Looking ahead, Proulx and team are taking a wider view of the phenomenon.

“We want to understand how the history of evolving maternal effects will affect populations as they experience future changes in the environment,” he said. “If they’ve evolved these adaptive maternal effects, are they going to do better if now the environment starts to change more, and also whether information can be transferred over more than one generation.”

This work received funding from the National Science Foundation.

Sonia Fernandez writes for the UCSB Office of Public Affairs and Communications.

 

Support Noozhawk Today

You are an important ally in our mission to deliver clear, objective, high-quality professional news reporting for Santa Barbara, Goleta and the rest of Santa Barbara County. Join the Hawks Club today to help keep Noozhawk soaring.

We offer four membership levels: $5 a month, $10 a month, $25 a month or $1 a week. Payments can be made using a credit card, Apple Pay or Google Pay, or click here for information on recurring credit-card payments and a mailing address for checks.

Thank you for your vital support.

Become a Noozhawk Supporter

First name
Last name
Email
Select your monthly membership
Or choose an annual membership
×

Payment Information

Membership Subscription

You are enrolling in . Thank you for joining the Hawks Club.

Payment Method

Pay by Credit Card:

Mastercard, Visa, American Express, Discover
One click only, please!

Pay with Apple Pay or Google Pay:

Noozhawk partners with Stripe to provide secure invoicing and payments processing.
You may cancel your membership at any time by sending an email to .(JavaScript must be enabled to view this email address).

  • Ask
  • Vote
  • Investigate
  • Answer

Noozhawk Asks: What’s Your Question?

Welcome to Noozhawk Asks, a new feature in which you ask the questions, you help decide what Noozhawk investigates, and you work with us to find the answers.

Here’s how it works: You share your questions with us in the nearby box. In some cases, we may work with you to find the answers. In others, we may ask you to vote on your top choices to help us narrow the scope. And we’ll be regularly asking you for your feedback on a specific issue or topic.

We also expect to work together with the reader who asked the winning questions to find the answer together. Noozhawk’s objective is to come at questions from a place of curiosity and openness, and we believe a transparent collaboration is the key to achieve it.

The results of our investigation will be published here in this Noozhawk Asks section. Once or twice a month, we plan to do a review of what was asked and answered.

Thanks for asking!

Click Here to Get Started >

Reader Comments

Noozhawk is no longer accepting reader comments on our articles. Click here for the announcement. Readers are instead invited to submit letters to the editor by emailing them to [email protected]. Please provide your full name and community, as well as contact information for verification purposes only.