Pixel Tracker

Monday, March 18 , 2019, 5:21 pm | Fair 65º


UCSB Researchers Analyze Nutrient Pollution’s Negative Impacts on Ecological Relationships

The alteration of nutrient exchange mutualisms due to an overabundance of nitrogen and phosphorus may represent an emerging threat of global change.
The alteration of nutrient exchange mutualisms due to an overabundance of nitrogen and phosphorus may represent an emerging threat of global change. ((Deron Burkepile photo))

Andrew Shantz and Deron Burkepile (Julie Cohen / The UCSB Current photo)

Nature has its own economy, with trading as dynamic as that of any stock exchange. To cope with nutrient deficiencies in their respective habitats, certain plants, animals and fungi have evolved partnerships by which they can swap resources.

However, according to a new study by UC Santa Barbara researchers Deron Burkepile and Andrew Shantz, excess nutrient input — or nutrient pollution — creates an imbalance in the interactions between partner — also known as mutualistic — species across a variety of ecosystems. The culprit: nitrogen fertilizers and fossil-fuel combustion.

Burkepile and Shantz’s findings appear in the journal Ecology Letters.

In a very short period of time, Burkepile noted, humans have short-circuited the tight recycling of nutrients between mutualistic species, and this in turn has changed the balance of how such partners interact.

“That’s especially important because lots of these organisms are the foundation species of ecosystems without which the ecosystem would cease to exist,” said Burkepile, an associate professor in UCSB’s Department of Ecology, Evolution, and Marine Biology.

Take, for example, reef-building coral, which contains tiny algae that allow for rapid growth even when nutrient stores are low.

“The presence of coral is what makes a coral reef,” Burkepile continued. “Without the association between coral and its symbiotic algae, you wouldn’t have coral reefs. Rainforest trees are what make those systems rainforests, and interactions with microbes are what drive the success of those plants.

“This research,” he added, “really focused on big important organisms within many different ecosystems, so the problem is a worldwide phenomenon.” 

As with corals and algae, these give-and-take scenarios occur between a phototroph, an organism that makes its own food through the process of photosynthesis, and a heterotroph, which must look to its environment for food.

But the economic tradeoffs in the natural marketplace are becoming unbalanced by nutrient pollution, most of which can be traced back to nitrogen fertilizers and fossil-fuel consumption.

The partners have evolved a reciprocal exchange whereby the heterotroph provides metabolic waste, nitrogen and phosphorus, to the phototroph, which requires these key nutrients to survive. In return, the phototroph supplies its partner with photosynthetically fixed carbon as sugar that the heterotroph uses for energy.

“When you start to add more and more of the nutrients that the animal would normally be providing, the plant is no longer as dependent on that animal for those nutrients and so it starts to return less of the sugars back to the animal,” explained lead author Shantz, a doctoral candidate in the Burkepile Community Ecology Laboratory.

“The effects are actually counterintuitive,” Burkepile said. “If you supply additional nutrients, the plant grows but often at the expense of its fungal partner in the mutualism, creating an imbalance in the relationship with potentially far-reaching implications.”

The researchers analyzed data from more than 300 different experiments conducted in both marine and terrestrial environments, including coral reefs, savanna grasslands, tropical rainforests and managed agricultural fields.

They found the same pattern occurring across continents and various ocean locations as well as across various levels of productivity and diversity. Each location showed shifts in the way symbiotic organisms interacted.

“With increasing nutrient pollution, we saw decreased growth in the fungi or bacteria and increased growth in the plant,” Burkepile explained. “While it seems like it would be good that the plant grows faster, other functions that the fungal or animal partners provide — such as protection against pathogens or drought and assistance in gathering micronutrients like iron — could be compromised. The benefit shifts to the phototroph and this has the potential to reorganize ecosystems by changing their dominant species.”

Reductions of excess nutrient input are possible, and addressing pollution both at global and local levels is important, noted Burkepile.

For example, controlling fossil-fuel combustion could reduce atmospheric nitrogen deposition on both land and sea. Changing farming practices could help to keep nutrients on the fields instead of letting them run off into creeks and rivers — and eventually into the ocean.

“It’s not necessarily about stopping the fertilization of crops,” Burkepile explained. “It’s just being more responsible about how those fertilizers are used.”

Buffer areas could also be important tools for controlling fertilizer overflow.

“If there is enough space around cropland, excess nutrients would have the chance to be taken up by other plants, reducing the content of the runoff that reaches the ocean,” Shantz said.

Nathan Lemoine of Colorado State University, Fort Collins, also contributed to this research. The work was funded by a National Science Foundation grant, a Smithsonian fellowship and a Florida International University fellowship.

Julie Cohen writes for the UCSB Office of Current Affairs and Publication.


Support Noozhawk Today!

Our professional journalists work tirelessly to report on local news so you can be more informed and engaged in your community. This quality, local reporting is free for you to read and share, but it's not free to produce.

You count on us to deliver timely, relevant local news, 24/7. Can we count on you to invest in our newsroom and help secure its future?

We provide special member benefits to show how much we appreciate your support.

I would like give...
Great! You're joining as a Red-Tailed Hawk!
  • Ask
  • Vote
  • Investigate
  • Answer

Noozhawk Asks: What’s Your Question?

Welcome to Noozhawk Asks, a new feature in which you ask the questions, you help decide what Noozhawk investigates, and you work with us to find the answers.

Here’s how it works: You share your questions with us in the nearby box. In some cases, we may work with you to find the answers. In others, we may ask you to vote on your top choices to help us narrow the scope. And we’ll be regularly asking you for your feedback on a specific issue or topic.

We also expect to work together with the reader who asked the winning questions to find the answer together. Noozhawk’s objective is to come at questions from a place of curiosity and openness, and we believe a transparent collaboration is the key to achieve it.

The results of our investigation will be published here in this Noozhawk Asks section. Once or twice a month, we plan to do a review of what was asked and answered.

Thanks for asking!

Click Here to Get Started >

Reader Comments

Noozhawk is no longer accepting reader comments on our articles. Click here for the announcement. Readers are instead invited to submit letters to the editor by emailing them to [email protected]. Please provide your full name and community, as well as contact information for verification purposes only.