Pixel Tracker

Friday, March 22 , 2019, 10:37 am | A Few Clouds 57º


UCSB Researchers Focus Study on Category Learning

A Trained Eye  show that category learning can be influenced by where an object is in our field of vision

We humans are pros at category learning — the process by which we classify things, whether objects, concepts or events, into groups that share certain features that are relevant to us.

We do it when we distinguish friends from strangers, decide whether or not to eat that wild berry, and even when we scan letters as we read an article about visual learning.

For the most part, category learning has been considered a high-level cognitive process that depends on abstract mental representations of the sensory information.

However, UCSB researchers Luke Rosedahl, Gregory Ashby and Miguel Eckstein have discovered something else.

Category learning, they have found, sometimes depends on representations from more primitive parts of the brain’s visual cortex that are sensitive to the precise location on the retina receiving the stimulation.

“This is important because the kind of learning that we found to be specific to the visual field is almost a subconscious kind of learning,” said Rosedahl, a researcher in UCSB’s Department of Psychological & Brain Sciences.

Rosedahl also is lead author of the team’s paper, Retinal-specific Category Learning, published in the journal Nature Human Behavior.

“It’s the kind of learning used by radiologists, for example, when they’re looking at scans to determine whether what they’re seeing is a tumor or not. Or by TSA screeners when they’re looking at scans of the bags and trying to find prohibited items; these are examples of implicit categorization,” he said.

Those experienced radiologists and TSA screeners amass their knowledge over the course of many trials, so their decisions often are not particularly conscious, but come in the form of feelings and hunches, Rosedahl said.

“They couldn’t always tell you why they feel like there’s a tumor there, or why they feel like this scan has a prohibited item, but they do, and then they look closely to see if it does or not,” he said.

However, Rosedahl and colleagues found that where the objects appear in one’s field of vision can affect the person’s ability to determine what it is.

Thus, a radiologist who is accustomed to seeing tumors on the right side of his or her field of vision may not have the same level of success if the tumor is located on the left.

And screeners who are used to objects scrolling by in one direction may not detect prohibited items coming from the opposite direction. In effect, they develop “categorizing blindspots.”

To investigate the phenomenon, the scientists developed a series of experiments in which subjects were trained to categorize objects that appeared on one side of their visual fields, with one eye covered.

Then they performed the experiment a second time, covering the other eye and flipping the object to the side opposite the trained eye.

“So what we found is when you switch eyes, performance does not decrease,” Rosedahl said. “But when you move the object to the other side, it does decrease.

“And that tells us two things. It tells us one, that the knowledge does generalize to the other eye, but it also tells us that the performance decrease for the other side wasn’t due to just any change in the experiment.”

According to Rosedahl, this phenomenon proves that some types of visual category learning depend on visual representations in the primary visual cortex, which is located at the very back of the mammalian brain and is specialized in pattern recognition.

This primitive visual cortical area has neurons that respond to specific patterns in particular areas of the visual field, whereas neurons in later visual cortices respond to stimuli anywhere in the visual field.

“It shows us that this implicit categorization system is in fact relying on much lower visual information than previously thought,” Rosedahl said.

The results of the study have implications for all of us who learn to recognize patterns that appear only on certain areas of our visual fields.

For instance, for Rosedahl, who is a novice surfer, this means he may have to work harder to judge a good wave when a set rolls in from the other side of the field of vision than the one he is used to.

“Is this a wave I’m going to be able to surf or not — that’s an implicit process,” he said.

“My biggest question now is how do we set up visual training protocols so that it would not be retinal-specific? How would we have a training paradigm so that peoples’ learning would be across the entire visual field?”

— Sonia Fernandez for UCSB.


Support Noozhawk Today!

Our professional journalists work tirelessly to report on local news so you can be more informed and engaged in your community. This quality, local reporting is free for you to read and share, but it's not free to produce.

You count on us to deliver timely, relevant local news, 24/7. Can we count on you to invest in our newsroom and help secure its future?

We provide special member benefits to show how much we appreciate your support.

I would like give...
Great! You're joining as a Red-Tailed Hawk!
  • Ask
  • Vote
  • Investigate
  • Answer

Noozhawk Asks: What’s Your Question?

Welcome to Noozhawk Asks, a new feature in which you ask the questions, you help decide what Noozhawk investigates, and you work with us to find the answers.

Here’s how it works: You share your questions with us in the nearby box. In some cases, we may work with you to find the answers. In others, we may ask you to vote on your top choices to help us narrow the scope. And we’ll be regularly asking you for your feedback on a specific issue or topic.

We also expect to work together with the reader who asked the winning questions to find the answer together. Noozhawk’s objective is to come at questions from a place of curiosity and openness, and we believe a transparent collaboration is the key to achieve it.

The results of our investigation will be published here in this Noozhawk Asks section. Once or twice a month, we plan to do a review of what was asked and answered.

Thanks for asking!

Click Here to Get Started >

Reader Comments

Noozhawk is no longer accepting reader comments on our articles. Click here for the announcement. Readers are instead invited to submit letters to the editor by emailing them to [email protected]. Please provide your full name and community, as well as contact information for verification purposes only.