Pixel Tracker

Saturday, January 19 , 2019, 5:14 pm | Fair 67º


UCSB Researchers Use Sediment Core to Examine Seafloor Ecosystem Biodiversity

The Santa Barbara Basin sediment core was collected aboard the now retired R/V Melville.
The Santa Barbara Basin sediment core was collected aboard the now retired R/V Melville. (Sarah Moffitt photo)

With one of the highest-quality climate and environmental archives in the world’s oceans, the Santa Barbara Basin presents the ideal natural laboratory for researchers studying the global climate record on a variety of time scales, from last year to a million years ago. That’s according to UC Santa Barbara geologist James Kennett.

Behind UCSB geologist James Kennett is the Santa Barbara Basin where the core sample was extracted. (Sonia Fernandez / UCSB photo)

Exploring this data-rich area off the coast of Southern California, Kennett and his colleagues at UC Davis and the San Francisco-based California Academy of Sciences found that abrupt climate changes caused small decreases in seawater oxygenation that in turn led to extensive seafloor ecosystem reorganizations. What’s more, recovery from these reorganizations took up to 1,000 years.

Their study, which appears Monday in the online Early Edition of the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, is the first to quantitatively examine broad ecosystem responses in the deep-sea sediment record.

“We were surprised to learn that this microfossil record is richer and more useful than first expected,” said co-author Kennett, UCSB professor emeritus of earth and marine science. “As a result, we were able to test the response time of different members of the bottom-dwelling ecosystem to both abrupt warming and cooling episodes. We were also surprised to discover just how long some took to recover.”

The research team analyzed more than 5,400 invertebrate microfossils — including sea urchins, clams, snails and crustaceans — from the offshore Santa Barbara sample. The sediment core — essentially a tube of material that covers a period between 3,400 and 16,100 years ago — provided a before-and-after snapshot of what happened during the global warming that occurred at the end of the last glacial period. This was a time of abrupt climate warming, melting polar ice caps and expansion of low oxygen zones in the ocean. The new study documents how long it took for ecosystems to begin the process of recovering from such a dramatic episode of climate change.

“These past events show us how sensitive ecosystems are to changes in Earth’s climate; it commits us to thousands of years of recovery,” said lead author Sarah Moffitt, a postdoctoral scholar at UC Davis in its Bodega Marine Laboratory and its Coastal and Marine Sciences Institute.

“Our analysis demonstrates that ocean sediments harbor metazoan fossil material that can be used to reconstruct the response of seafloor biodiversity to global-scale climate events,” Kennett explained. “We show that the last deglaciation — the most recent episode of climate warming — was accompanied by abrupt reorganizations of continental margin seafloor ecosystems through expansions and contractions of the subsurface low-oxygen zones.”

The history lesson told by the sediment core is one of initially abundant, diverse and well-oxygenated seafloor ecosystems, followed by a period of warming and oxygen loss in the oceans and then by a rapid loss of diversity. In fact, microfossils nearly disappeared from the record during those times of low oxygen.

The researchers found that oceanic oxygen levels fell by between 0.5 and 1.5 mL/L over a period of less than 100 years, demonstrating that relatively minor changes in oxygen levels could result in dramatic shifts and reorganizations for seafloor communities. Kennett noted that these results suggest that future global climate change may result in ecosystem-level effects with millennial-scale recovery periods.

“It shows us what we’re doing now is a long-term shift; there’s not a recovery we have to look forward to in my lifetime or my grandchildren’s lifetime,” Moffitt said. “It’s a gritty reality we need to face as scientists and people who care about the natural world and who make decisions about the natural world.”

The research was funded by the National Science Foundation as well as the University of California Multicampus Research Programs and Initiatives.

— Julie Cohen represents the UCSB Office of Public Affairs and Communications.

Support Noozhawk Today

You are an important ally in our mission to deliver clear, objective, high-quality professional news reporting for Santa Barbara, Goleta and the rest of Santa Barbara County. Join the Hawks Club today to help keep Noozhawk soaring.

We offer four membership levels: $5 a month, $10 a month, $25 a month or $1 a week. Payments can be made using a credit card, Apple Pay or Google Pay, or click here for information on recurring credit-card payments and a mailing address for checks.

Thank you for your vital support.

Become a Noozhawk Supporter

First name
Last name
Select your monthly membership
Or choose an annual membership

Payment Information

Membership Subscription

You are enrolling in . Thank you for joining the Hawks Club.

Payment Method

Pay by Credit Card:

Mastercard, Visa, American Express, Discover
One click only, please!

Pay with Apple Pay or Google Pay:

Noozhawk partners with Stripe to provide secure invoicing and payments processing.
You may cancel your membership at any time by sending an email to .(JavaScript must be enabled to view this email address).

  • Ask
  • Vote
  • Investigate
  • Answer

Noozhawk Asks: What’s Your Question?

Welcome to Noozhawk Asks, a new feature in which you ask the questions, you help decide what Noozhawk investigates, and you work with us to find the answers.

Here’s how it works: You share your questions with us in the nearby box. In some cases, we may work with you to find the answers. In others, we may ask you to vote on your top choices to help us narrow the scope. And we’ll be regularly asking you for your feedback on a specific issue or topic.

We also expect to work together with the reader who asked the winning questions to find the answer together. Noozhawk’s objective is to come at questions from a place of curiosity and openness, and we believe a transparent collaboration is the key to achieve it.

The results of our investigation will be published here in this Noozhawk Asks section. Once or twice a month, we plan to do a review of what was asked and answered.

Thanks for asking!

Click Here to Get Started >

Reader Comments

Noozhawk is no longer accepting reader comments on our articles. Click here for the announcement. Readers are instead invited to submit letters to the editor by emailing them to [email protected]. Please provide your full name and community, as well as contact information for verification purposes only.