Wednesday, July 18 , 2018, 8:08 pm | Fair 68º

 
 
 
 

UCSB Scholars Analyze Supreme Court Rulings on Same-Sex Marriage

With Wednesday morning’s landmark Supreme Court rulings –– and Gov. Jerry Brown’s announcement that county clerks will soon begin issuing marriage licenses to same-sex couples –– California becomes the 13th state to legalize same-sex marriage.

In addition, the court’s decision to overturn a key provision of the Defense of Marriage Act will give legally married same-sex couples the same federal protections and benefits accorded heterosexual couples.

“Today’s Supreme Court rulings are a huge win for gay and lesbian rights,” said Verta Taylor, professor of sociology at UC Santa Barbara. “It is a watershed moment in the history of gay rights that will affect the lives of hundreds of thousands of same-sex couples and families.”

In a 5-4 vote, the Supreme Court invalidated the Defense of Marriage Act on the grounds that it violated the Fifth Amendment’s protection of equal liberty. Passed by Congress and signed into law by President Bill Clinton in 1996, the Defense of Marriage act is a provision that, for purposes of federal benefits, defines marriage as a legal union between one man and one woman.

“DOMA’s principal effect,” Justice Anthony Kennedy wrote in the majority opinion, “is to identify a subset of state-sanctioned marriages and make them unequal.”

According to Gayle Binion, a professor emeritus of political science at UCSB, the majority voted as she and other scholars expected they would.

“The question the court was willing to ask was whether the U.S. government has any justification other than animus toward marriage between gays to distinguish among those state-recognized marriages it does honor and those it does not,” she said. “By taking this approach, the court did not have to rule on whether gay marriage is itself a constitutionally protected right –– only that distinguishing among those the states have authorized to marry does not serve a legitimate governmental interest.”

Regarding the challenge to Proposition 8, California’s ban on gay marriage, which was approved by voters in 2008, the court said it couldn’t rule because the supporters of the ban lacked legal standing to appeal the lower court’s decision against it.

“The Supreme Court hasn’t ruled that Prop 8 constitutes a discriminatory practice,” said Michael Bourgeois, who recently completed his doctorate in sociology at UCSB. “It just says the proponents who brought it to the court had no standing to do so.”

According to Taylor, the two rulings will undoubtedly pave the way for same-sex marriage in the 38 states where it is currently illegal.

“Several other states have moved or are poised to legalize same-sex marriage in the coming months,” she said. “The court’s ruling that the defenders of Proposition 8 have no legal standing, together with its ruling that DOMA violates the equal protection clause of the United States Constitution, will likely make it more difficult for similar challenges to prevail in other states.”

“It’s a very federalist decision,” Anna Sorensen, a UCSB graduate student working on her Ph.D. in sociology, said of the Proposition 8 ruling. “The Supreme Court gave no inkling that [same-sex marriage] should be a right. It’s strictly a states-rights ruling.”

While neither Supreme Court decision established same-sex marriage as a constitutionally protected right across the country, each represents a huge victory, Bourgeois noted

“For the first time in history, same-sex marriages in states where it’s legal must be recognized by the federal government,” he said.

 

Support Noozhawk Today

You are an important ally in our mission to deliver clear, objective, high-quality professional news reporting for Santa Barbara, Goleta and the rest of Santa Barbara County. Join the Hawks Club today to help keep Noozhawk soaring.

We offer four membership levels: $5 a month, $10 a month, $25 a month or $1 a week. Payments can be made through Stripe below, or click here for information on recurring credit-card payments and a mailing address for checks.

Thank you for your vital support.

Become a Noozhawk Supporter

First name
Last name
Enter your email
Select your membership level
×

Payment Information

You are purchasing:

Payment Method

Pay by Credit Card:

Mastercard, Visa, American Express, Discover
One click only, please!

Pay with Apple Pay or Google Pay:

Noozhawk partners with Stripe to provide secure invoicing and payments processing.

  • Ask
  • Vote
  • Investigate
  • Answer

Noozhawk Asks: What’s Your Question?

Welcome to Noozhawk Asks, a new feature in which you ask the questions, you help decide what Noozhawk investigates, and you work with us to find the answers.

Here’s how it works: You share your questions with us in the nearby box. In some cases, we may work with you to find the answers. In others, we may ask you to vote on your top choices to help us narrow the scope. And we’ll be regularly asking you for your feedback on a specific issue or topic.

We also expect to work together with the reader who asked the winning questions to find the answer together. Noozhawk’s objective is to come at questions from a place of curiosity and openness, and we believe a transparent collaboration is the key to achieve it.

The results of our investigation will be published here in this Noozhawk Asks section. Once or twice a month, we plan to do a review of what was asked and answered.

Thanks for asking!

Click Here to Get Started >

Reader Comments

Noozhawk is no longer accepting reader comments on our articles. Click here for the announcement. Readers are instead invited to submit letters to the editor by emailing them to [email protected]. Please provide your full name and community, as well as contact information for verification purposes only.

Daily Noozhawk

Subscribe to Noozhawk's A.M. Report, our free e-Bulletin sent out every day at 4:15 a.m. with Noozhawk's top stories, hand-picked by the editors.

Sign Up Now >