Monday, January 22 , 2018, 8:20 am | Fair 54º


UCSB Scientists Making Waves in Coastal Management

Better Science Faster

Scientists at UCSB’s NCEAS are transforming how complex marine data from the Ocean
Health Index is synthesized, communicated and used for coastal management

In 2012, scientists at UCSB's National Center for Ecological Analysis and Synthesis (NCEAS) launched the Ocean Health Index
(OHI), a scientific framework to measure and track the health of the world’s oceans.

Working in partnership with the nonprofit Conservation International, the OHI team measured the combined benefits that oceans sustainably provide for people — from wild-caught and farmed seafood to habitats that protect coastlines.

Annual status reports show how and where to improve ocean management.

Now, OHI researchers are transforming the way marine scientists engage with coastal management by leveraging practices and tools used by Silicon Valley software developers to promote teamwork.

Employing several free software solutions that upgrade collaborative research, the team has been able to make its entire workflow more transparent and streamlined while enhancing the reproducibility of their data methods.

The way in which OHI scientists adopted these high-tech practices is described in a new paper in the journal Nature Ecology & Evolution.

“We combine best practices from ocean sciences and data science to help inform the management of coastlines around the world,” said co-author Benjamin Halpern, NCEAS director and OHI chief scientist.

“It was humbling to have so carefully documented what we did the first time around and then realize that it wasn’t enough to efficiently repeat our work," he said.

"We’ve had to completely change the way we do science. Now we do better science, and we also can do it much faster,” he said.

Developing the OHI framework and using it to assess 220 coastal countries was a massive undertaking of data mining and synthesis. The effort involved more than 30 scientists and 100 public datasets.

As a way to track changes, the team worked by saving different versions of each file and collaborated about decisions via email.

But as the researchers started repeating their methods from year to year to assess global changes in ocean health, problems arose because of the way they had originally worked with data.

“We quickly realized that we needed to transform how we worked to meet the demands of modern science,” said lead author Julia Stewart Lowndes, an OHI project scientist at NCEAS.

“We became data scientists, which means, among other things, coding collaboratively the way software developers do,” she said.

Lowndes said data science is incredibly powerful for both analyses and communication.

“We’re using software tools built specifically for working with data, which includes communicating about what you’re doing,” she said.

“We’ve used these tools to make our methods more repeatable, but what has been game-changing is that we can also use them to build interactive reports and websites so that others can build from our methods directly," Lowndes said.

Sharing data and tools has become essential for global progress on climate, water and biodiversity issues. And this new approach has made OHI methods available to everyone.

In fact, 20 groups worldwide, including the governments of Mexico and Indonesia and scientists in Sweden assessing countries on the Baltic Sea, are using OHI science and code for their own coastal management.

“We’ve been able to reimagine the way our science is done, communicated, shared and used,” Lowndes said.

“We’re sharing our story because we hope to encourage others in the scientific community to do the same so we can all produce better science in less time.”

— Julie Cohen/Andrea Estrada for UCSB.

  • Ask
  • Vote
  • Investigate
  • Answer

Noozhawk Asks: What’s Your Question?

Welcome to Noozhawk Asks, a new feature in which you ask the questions, you help decide what Noozhawk investigates, and you work with us to find the answers.

Here’s how it works: You share your questions with us in the nearby box. In some cases, we may work with you to find the answers. In others, we may ask you to vote on your top choices to help us narrow the scope. And we’ll be regularly asking you for your feedback on a specific issue or topic.

We also expect to work together with the reader who asked the winning questions to find the answer together. Noozhawk’s objective is to come at questions from a place of curiosity and openness, and we believe a transparent collaboration is the key to achieve it.

The results of our investigation will be published here in this Noozhawk Asks section. Once or twice a month, we plan to do a review of what was asked and answered.

Thanks for asking!

Click here to get started >

Support Noozhawk Today

You are an important ally in our mission to deliver clear, objective, high-quality professional news reporting for Santa Barbara, Goleta and the rest of Santa Barbara County. Join the Hawks Club today to help keep Noozhawk soaring.

We offer four membership levels: $5 a month, $10 a month, $25 a month or $1 a week. Payments can be made through PayPal below, or click here for information on recurring credit-card payments.

Thank you for your vital support.

Reader Comments

Noozhawk is no longer accepting reader comments on our articles. Click here for the announcement. Readers are instead invited to submit letters to the editor by emailing them to [email protected]. Please provide your full name and community, as well as contact information for verification purposes only.

Daily Noozhawk

Subscribe to Noozhawk's A.M. Report, our free e-Bulletin sent out every day at 4:15 a.m. with Noozhawk's top stories, hand-picked by the editors.

Sign Up Now >