Friday, October 19 , 2018, 8:43 am | Fair 49º

 
 
 
 
Advice

Veronique de Rugy: All Roads Lead to Washington as Congress Resurrects Ex-Im Bank

After allowing the Export-Import Bank of the United States's charter to lapse June 30, Congress voted to revive it this month on the back of an expensive highway bill.

The agency is the modern iteration of a New Deal-era program that mostly extends loans and loan guarantees to foreign companies to buy U.S. goods and services, backed by your hard-earned tax dollars.

It's an outrageous example of corporate welfare for companies with no need of government subsidies, and its reauthorization is yet another sign of how much power the business lobby and the U.S. Chamber of Commerce hold.

However, though Congress's commitment to this unhealthy and unfair marriage between big government and big business is depressing, it still isn't business as usual at the bank.

According to the bank's charter, the board of directors is made of five members, and three board members are needed to achieve quorum. Without three members, the agency can only approve transactions valued at less than $10 million.

As it turns out, the bank has been missing three members since July. The only two board members remaining are the bank's chairman, Fred Hochberg, and its vice chairwoman, Wanda Felton, while there are vacancies for two Republican board members and one Democratic board member.

So far, the only nominee President Barack Obama has put forth is Patricia Loui-Schmicker, a Democrat whose term on the bank's board expired Jan. 20.

The stakes are high for anti-crony advocates because not approving the third board member (whether Republican or Democrat) would effectively cut big businesses out of the Ex-Im Bank.

The bank dataset shows that 84 percent of the values of approved deals over the past eight years have been above $10 million.

Although the majority of deals approved are below the $10 million threshold, they still only represent 16 percent of the total dollar amount approved.

These data provide additional evidence that the bank is not in the small-business "business," as its supporters claim.

In fact, in 2014, some 65 percent of the bank's activities benefited 10 giant U.S. companies, with Boeing and General Electric leading the pack.

The companies and their customers have access to the capital market and don't need the support of government to prosper. Not surprisingly, these companies have also bankrolled the lobbying effort to revive the bank.

Now, this situation raises some interesting political dynamics. For instance, during the past two years of debate over the renewal of the bank's charter, Democrats have claimed that they support the program because of its benefits to the small-business side. This development should make them happy.

On the other side of the political aisle, it will be interesting to see what Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell and Senate Banking Committee Chairman Richard Shelby do about the nomination of Loui-Schmicker.

Senate leadership can decide whether to move forward with her nomination hearing or, as is typically done, wait to pair her with a Republican nominee because there are currently no Republicans sitting on the bank's board.

The two men are key players here, because McConnell can decide whether or not he approves of the president's Republican nominee and Shelby presumably has some amount of control in deciding whether or not to schedule a hearing for the nomination of that third (and possibly fourth) board member. Both men are theoretically against this crony-capitalist boondoggle.

McConnell and Shelby have many reasons not to schedule a nomination hearing, including the fact that it doesn't make much sense for Republicans to get any of President Obama's nominees through in the last year of his term.

That's the theory, of course. The reality is that in Washington, politicians make deals.

It rarely works to the advantage of taxpayers and consumers, but it doesn't stop the alliances from being made and the deals from being sealed. This time may be no different.

— Veronique de Rugy is a senior research fellow at the Mercatus Center at George Mason University, a columnist for Reason magazine and the Washington Examiner, and blogs about ecomomics for National Review. Click here to contact her, and follow her on Twitter: @veroderugy. Click here to read previous columns. The opinions expressed are her own.

Support Noozhawk Today

You are an important ally in our mission to deliver clear, objective, high-quality professional news reporting for Santa Barbara, Goleta and the rest of Santa Barbara County. Join the Hawks Club today to help keep Noozhawk soaring.

We offer four membership levels: $5 a month, $10 a month, $25 a month or $1 a week. Payments can be made using a credit card, Apple Pay or Google Pay, or click here for information on recurring credit-card payments and a mailing address for checks.

Thank you for your vital support.

Become a Noozhawk Supporter

First name
Last name
Email
Select your monthly membership
Or choose an annual membership
×

Payment Information

Membership Subscription

You are enrolling in . Thank you for joining the Hawks Club.

Payment Method

Pay by Credit Card:

Mastercard, Visa, American Express, Discover
One click only, please!

Pay with Apple Pay or Google Pay:

Noozhawk partners with Stripe to provide secure invoicing and payments processing.
You may cancel your membership at any time by sending an email to .(JavaScript must be enabled to view this email address).

  • Ask
  • Vote
  • Investigate
  • Answer

Noozhawk Asks: What’s Your Question?

Welcome to Noozhawk Asks, a new feature in which you ask the questions, you help decide what Noozhawk investigates, and you work with us to find the answers.

Here’s how it works: You share your questions with us in the nearby box. In some cases, we may work with you to find the answers. In others, we may ask you to vote on your top choices to help us narrow the scope. And we’ll be regularly asking you for your feedback on a specific issue or topic.

We also expect to work together with the reader who asked the winning questions to find the answer together. Noozhawk’s objective is to come at questions from a place of curiosity and openness, and we believe a transparent collaboration is the key to achieve it.

The results of our investigation will be published here in this Noozhawk Asks section. Once or twice a month, we plan to do a review of what was asked and answered.

Thanks for asking!

Click Here to Get Started >

Reader Comments

Noozhawk is no longer accepting reader comments on our articles. Click here for the announcement. Readers are instead invited to submit letters to the editor by emailing them to [email protected]. Please provide your full name and community, as well as contact information for verification purposes only.