Tuesday, September 18 , 2018, 8:22 pm | Fair 70º

 
 
 
 
Advice

Veronique de Rugy: Christmas Lists, New Year’s Resolutions and Economic Freedom

It's Christmas time again, and with it come the dreams of better times. Families struggling with the consequences of the most recent recession will be happy to know that there is a simple way to improve their lives and keep or make more money in the process.

It's called economic freedom, and the United States used to be very good at maintaining it.

Economic freedom is measured by, among other things, levels of personal choice, the ability to enter markets and the security of privately owned property.

According to the Fraser Institute's annual Economic Freedom of the World report, the United States ranks No. 16 in terms of being an economically free country, a significant fall from its No. 2 status in 2000.

"A weakened rule of law, the so-called wars on terrorism and drugs, and a confused regulatory environment have helped erode economic freedom in the United States," explains Fred McMahon, one of the report's authors.

There is a vast amount of literature on the benefits of economic freedom. For instance, a review of 45 studies by economists Chris Doucouliagos and Mehmet Ali Ulubasoglu shows a strong relationship between economic freedom and growth, but it is also associated with higher income levels (i.e., more money in people's pockets) and better environment outcomes (better living conditions).

Better yet, as my colleague Matthew Mitchell documented in several places, more economic freedom also means less of the things we don't want — such as national insecurity, crimes and infant mortality — and more of the stuff we do want, such as literacy.

He writes, "The balance of evidence is overwhelming that economic freedom corresponds with a wide variety of positive outcomes with almost no negative tradeoffs."

The same results can be found at the state level. For instance, an article called "More Economic Freedom, More Jobs," published in the October 2013 issue of Regulation magazine, looks at what could explain the large differences in unemployment rates among the states.

Though they acknowledge that the gradations can be partially attributed to demographics, hangovers from the housing crisis or the oil-and-gas boom, the authors wanted to attempt to measure the impact that economic freedom can have on unemployment rates.

Their main finding is that there is a strong negative relationship between economic freedom and unemployment across the states, even when controlling for many other factors that affect the labor market.

Having a job — versus not having one — is obviously great and means more money in a family's pocket, but another source of financial improvement for families could come from actually getting rid of a bunch of government programs and regulations.

There are so many that I can't list them all, but obviously, ending the decades-long war on drugs seems like a no-brainer.

It would bring tremendous benefits to many families whose loved ones are locked up and the lives that are destroyed because big-government policy dictates what individuals can and cannot consume. Indeed, some 80 percent of drug-related arrests are for possession alone.

Smaller changes in policies would also save Americans a lot of money.

At The Heritage Foundation, economist Salim Furth lists 12 free market reforms that would save the average American household $4,440 a year.

At the local level, these policies include ending or limiting zoning laws — such as parking minimums and height restrictions for buildings.

At the state level, ending occupational licensing laws and implementing medical tort reform, among other things, would improve economic freedom and save Americans their hard-earned cash.

Not surprisingly, the biggest savings would come from reforms at the federal level.

Getting rid of the ethanol mandate, which requires refiners to use corn for gasoline, would save the average household $255 a year.

Getting rid of the Obama administration's Corporate Average Fuel Economy standards would save the average household $448 a year.

Lifting crude oil export restrictions would save the average household $227, and reducing the complexity and compliance costs of the corporate income tax would save the average household $230 per year.

I am sure that making or keeping more of their own money is on many Americans' Christmas lists this year. Maybe Congress should put improving economic freedom on its New Year's resolution list.

— Veronique de Rugy is a senior research fellow at the Mercatus Center at George Mason University, a columnist for Reason magazine and the Washington Examiner, and blogs about ecomomics for National Review. Click here to contact her, and follow her on Twitter: @veroderugy. Click here to read previous columns. The opinions expressed are her own.

Support Noozhawk Today

You are an important ally in our mission to deliver clear, objective, high-quality professional news reporting for Santa Barbara, Goleta and the rest of Santa Barbara County. Join the Hawks Club today to help keep Noozhawk soaring.

We offer four membership levels: $5 a month, $10 a month, $25 a month or $1 a week. Payments can be made using a credit card, Apple Pay or Google Pay, or click here for information on recurring credit-card payments and a mailing address for checks.

Thank you for your vital support.

Become a Noozhawk Supporter

First name
Last name
Email
Select your monthly membership
Or choose an annual membership
×

Payment Information

Membership Subscription

You are enrolling in . Thank you for joining the Hawks Club.

Payment Method

Pay by Credit Card:

Mastercard, Visa, American Express, Discover
One click only, please!

Pay with Apple Pay or Google Pay:

Noozhawk partners with Stripe to provide secure invoicing and payments processing.
You may cancel your membership at any time by sending an email to .(JavaScript must be enabled to view this email address).

  • Ask
  • Vote
  • Investigate
  • Answer

Noozhawk Asks: What’s Your Question?

Welcome to Noozhawk Asks, a new feature in which you ask the questions, you help decide what Noozhawk investigates, and you work with us to find the answers.

Here’s how it works: You share your questions with us in the nearby box. In some cases, we may work with you to find the answers. In others, we may ask you to vote on your top choices to help us narrow the scope. And we’ll be regularly asking you for your feedback on a specific issue or topic.

We also expect to work together with the reader who asked the winning questions to find the answer together. Noozhawk’s objective is to come at questions from a place of curiosity and openness, and we believe a transparent collaboration is the key to achieve it.

The results of our investigation will be published here in this Noozhawk Asks section. Once or twice a month, we plan to do a review of what was asked and answered.

Thanks for asking!

Click Here to Get Started >

Reader Comments

Noozhawk is no longer accepting reader comments on our articles. Click here for the announcement. Readers are instead invited to submit letters to the editor by emailing them to [email protected]. Please provide your full name and community, as well as contact information for verification purposes only.

Daily Noozhawk

Subscribe to Noozhawk's A.M. Report, our free e-Bulletin sent out every day at 4:15 a.m. with Noozhawk's top stories, hand-picked by the editors.

Sign Up Now >