Thursday, May 24 , 2018, 5:17 pm | Overcast 63º


Veronique de Rugy: Here He Comes to Save the Day! Mighty Mnuchin Is on His Way

Treasury Secretary Steven Mnuchin claims he has been using his "superpowers" to keep the federal government from defaulting on its debt since April, when the federal debt hit the debt ceiling.

This self-labeled superhero is trying to give lawmakers some time until they raise the debt limit, letting them continue to spend above their means.

In reality, the superhero thing to do would be to persuade Congress to implement some fiscally responsible reforms that would get us out of the mess we're in, including the perpetual debate about the debt ceiling.

As of today, the federal government owes nearly $20 trillion to foreign and domestic investors.

According to the Congressional Budget Office, this is just the beginning; by 2047, our debt will be 150 percent of our gross domestic product — up from a little over 100 percent today — thanks primarily to an aging population and poorly structured entitlement programs.

Call me crazy, but I think these numbers speak for themselves, in terms of our need to stop spending money we don't have.

Ironically, the debt ceiling hasn't done much to limit debt accumulation. It was raised 78 times between 1962 and 2012. It was even suspended altogether during the past three years.

Not only is the debt ceiling on the rise, but also over time the speed of its rise is increasing. From 1989 to 2001, on average the debt ceiling was raised by over $250 billion per year.

Between 2002 and 2012, the average debt ceiling increase not only climbed every year but also reached over $1 trillion per year, more than double its previous maximum. (Note: These data don't include the years 2013-17, as the debt ceiling was suspended numerous times in that period.)

The importance of the debt ceiling, however, is less about the role it plays as a constraint on the debt and more about the way it forces a conversation about our debt problem and the need for a solution.

To Mnuchin's credit, unlike his two immediate predecessors, he didn't claim that the debt ceiling had to be raised the minute our debt hit the limit on April 28. Instead, without any drama, he promptly implemented a series of measures (these measures are what he calls his superpowers) to allow more time for lawmakers to raise the debt ceiling.

Unfortunately, like his predecessors, he's taking the easy road and asking Congress for a "clean debt ceiling increase" before we hit the Sept. 29 deadline.

The refusal to include institutional reforms and spending caps along with an increase in the government's borrowing authority is, of course, how we got in this mess in the first place.

I understand that lawmakers would rather spend as if there's no tomorrow, but I'd hope that the treasury secretary would be more realistic. Apparently not.

Mnuchin is no different from his predecessors in failing to demand that we stop kicking the can down the road, forcing future generations to somehow address the problem instead.

During a hearing in July, Mnuchin announced that he has no intention of prioritizing payments to avoid a default until lawmakers reach an agreement about what measures should be used to pay for some of that new future debt.

"I think that doesn't make sense," he noted. "The government should honor all of its obligations, and the debt limit should be raised."

I agree that we shouldn't default on our debt, but doing nothing to control government spending is what doesn't make sense. Besides, as the secretary must know, Treasury can prioritize payments, starting with interest on our debt.

Last October, Treasury collected $222 billion, and interest payments were $23 billion, leaving plenty of money to pay for the military, Social Security, Medicare, Medicaid and some non-defense discretionary spending.

Something similar will happen this October once we breach the debt ceiling. So unless Treasury wants us to default, we won't.

But make no mistake; the negative effects of failing to control our future debt — such as slow growth, higher unemployment and higher taxes — won't be felt immediately, but they'll be real for future generations.

As such, the superhero thing to do is to call for action today rather than continue decades of unaccountable, unlimited funding for bloated and unsustainable entitlement programs, such as Medicare and Social Security.

— Veronique de Rugy is a senior research fellow at the Mercatus Center at George Mason University, a columnist for Reason magazine and the Washington Examiner, and blogs about ecomomics for National Review. Click here to contact her, and follow her on Twitter: @veroderugy. Click here to read previous columns. The opinions expressed are her own.

Support Noozhawk Today

You are an important ally in our mission to deliver clear, objective, high-quality professional news reporting for Santa Barbara, Goleta and the rest of Santa Barbara County. Join the Hawks Club today to help keep Noozhawk soaring.

We offer four membership levels: $5 a month, $10 a month, $25 a month or $1 a week. Payments can be made through PayPal below, or click here for information on recurring credit-card payments.

Thank you for your vital support.

Become a Supporter

Enter your email
Select your membership level

Payment Information

You are purchasing:

Payment Method

Pay by Credit Card:

Mastercard, Visa, American Express, Discover

Pay with Apple Pay or Google Pay:

Noozhawk partners with Stripe to provide secure invoicing and payments processing.

  • Ask
  • Vote
  • Investigate
  • Answer

Noozhawk Asks: What’s Your Question?

Welcome to Noozhawk Asks, a new feature in which you ask the questions, you help decide what Noozhawk investigates, and you work with us to find the answers.

Here’s how it works: You share your questions with us in the nearby box. In some cases, we may work with you to find the answers. In others, we may ask you to vote on your top choices to help us narrow the scope. And we’ll be regularly asking you for your feedback on a specific issue or topic.

We also expect to work together with the reader who asked the winning questions to find the answer together. Noozhawk’s objective is to come at questions from a place of curiosity and openness, and we believe a transparent collaboration is the key to achieve it.

The results of our investigation will be published here in this Noozhawk Asks section. Once or twice a month, we plan to do a review of what was asked and answered.

Thanks for asking!

Click Here to Get Started >

Reader Comments

Noozhawk is no longer accepting reader comments on our articles. Click here for the announcement. Readers are instead invited to submit letters to the editor by emailing them to [email protected]. Please provide your full name and community, as well as contact information for verification purposes only.

Daily Noozhawk

Subscribe to Noozhawk's A.M. Report, our free e-Bulletin sent out every day at 4:15 a.m. with Noozhawk's top stories, hand-picked by the editors.

Sign Up Now >