Pixel Tracker

Thursday, March 21 , 2019, 3:18 pm | Mostly Cloudy 57º

 
 
 
 

Veronique de Rugy: Not Even Confession Is Good for the Soul of the Steel Industry

In light of President Donald Trump's announcement of new tariffs for China, I thought I'd share one thing I've learned this year about those who believe in protectionism.

Don't be fooled; even though they claim that America benefits from protectionist policies, many of them know that those policies hurt us all. Occasionally, they even admit it in public.

Here's a recent example. A few weeks ago, Commerce Secretary Wilbur Ross expressed his opinion that everyone should relax about the Trump administration's giving a handout to its friends in the steel industry, because the tariffs will only hurt our whole nation a little.

The pain, he says, will be "negligible." That's easy for him to say from the comfort of his federal government office.

As my colleague and trade expert Christine McDaniel noted at the time, trade economists know full well that the size of the nationwide estimate used by the secretary to justify the president's import tax is pretty irrelevant.

Yes, economywide effects of import taxes on a good in one particular industry are understandably very small when measured against our giant economy and all industries put together.

What really matters is that on net, the economy, the American people and American firms will suffer more than the steelworkers and moguls in the steel industry will benefit. What Ross, of course, forgot to mention is that the specific impact of the steel tariffs on those workers and firms in steel-consuming industries is not only negative but large.

As if the carelessness of our commerce secretary weren't enough, I draw your attention to a new report by a steel lobbyist group called the Coalition for a Prosperous America.

It argues that the Trump tariffs on steel and aluminum imports will create 19,000 jobs and reduce the United States' gross domestic product by only $1.4 billion.

First, let's consider these findings in the most favorable light. Let's assume that the tariffs will actually produce 19,000 jobs. Let's also assume that the creation of these jobs will cost only $1.4 billion in economic growth.

As George Mason University economist Donald Boudreaux notes, "each job created will cost $73,684 (which is $1.4 billion divided by 19,000). The typical worker in a steel mill earns in annual wages about $55,556. If we assume that this worker gets another 20 percent of this pay in the form of fringe benefits, each steel-mill worker, on average, is annually paid about $66,667.

It appears, therefore, that the price we Americans will pay per job created will be roughly $7,000 more than each of these jobs is worth." That's not a good thing.

I suspect that like Ross, the lobbyists believe that this isn't a high cost for us to pay. But as Boudreaux rightfully adds, "this same reasoning, were it valid, would also justify pickpocketing, as the negative impact of pickpocketing on U.S. GDP is likewise very tiny."

Second, as the Mercatus Center's trade policy co-director Dan Griswold also commented upon reading the report, "if the number of workers goes up, and total output goes down, is it not simple math that output per worker (or per hour worked) has gone down?"

Yes, it is. That means that the workers' productivity has gone down and that their wages will, too.

In other words, the Coalition for a Prosperous America might say, yes, Americans are losers, but they should just relax about their big losses, as the steel industry will have the tiniest gain.

To make matters worse, it's hard to take that study seriously in the first place, considering that the head of the Coalition for a Prosperous America is the chairman emeritus of Nucor, which, as the biggest steel company in the United States, stands to benefit the most from the import tax.

It's even harder to take the study seriously when one knows what happened when the United States imposed steel tariffs in 2002. It's questionable as to whether those tariffs created any net jobs in the steel industry, and they clearly caused the destruction of more jobs in steel-consuming companies than were employed in the entire steel industry at the time.

We're talking about some 200,000 workers losing their jobs.

Americans must wake up. When government officials and special interests are so confident that we'll let them pick our pockets without any resistance — even when they tell us they're robbing us — you know things have got to change.

— Veronique de Rugy is a senior research fellow at the Mercatus Center at George Mason University, a columnist for Reason magazine and the Washington Examiner, and blogs about ecomomics for National Review. Click here to contact her, and follow her on Twitter: @veroderugy. Click here to read previous columns. The opinions expressed are her own.

Support Noozhawk Today!

Our professional journalists work tirelessly to report on local news so you can be more informed and engaged in your community. This quality, local reporting is free for you to read and share, but it's not free to produce.

You count on us to deliver timely, relevant local news, 24/7. Can we count on you to invest in our newsroom and help secure its future?

We provide special member benefits to show how much we appreciate your support.

Email
I would like give...
Great! You're joining as a Red-Tailed Hawk!
  • Ask
  • Vote
  • Investigate
  • Answer

Noozhawk Asks: What’s Your Question?

Welcome to Noozhawk Asks, a new feature in which you ask the questions, you help decide what Noozhawk investigates, and you work with us to find the answers.

Here’s how it works: You share your questions with us in the nearby box. In some cases, we may work with you to find the answers. In others, we may ask you to vote on your top choices to help us narrow the scope. And we’ll be regularly asking you for your feedback on a specific issue or topic.

We also expect to work together with the reader who asked the winning questions to find the answer together. Noozhawk’s objective is to come at questions from a place of curiosity and openness, and we believe a transparent collaboration is the key to achieve it.

The results of our investigation will be published here in this Noozhawk Asks section. Once or twice a month, we plan to do a review of what was asked and answered.

Thanks for asking!

Click Here to Get Started >

Reader Comments

Noozhawk is no longer accepting reader comments on our articles. Click here for the announcement. Readers are instead invited to submit letters to the editor by emailing them to [email protected]. Please provide your full name and community, as well as contact information for verification purposes only.