Pixel Tracker

Sunday, December 16 , 2018, 10:52 am | Partly Cloudy 61º


Veronique de Rugy: Barack Obama’s Much Ado About Nothing Budget

President Barback Obama recently released his last budget, laying out his priorities and proposals for FY 2017 and the years to come.

Not surprisingly, it’s a tax-and-spend budget that not only does nothing to get us off the unsustainable financial path we’re on but also claims that more taxes and spending will grow the economy.

According to Congressional Quarterly, Obama’s budget should be called the "Do Nothing Budget."

It’s a good name if we consider that it doesn’t do anything to address the explosion of the debt and the growth in spending for Medicare, Medicaid, Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act subsidies and Social Security.

Even though it’s not going to happen, let’s assume that Obama gets his way on the tax, spend and economic growth front.

According to his baseline budget, debt held by the public will go to $21.3 trillion in 2026 from $14.7 trillion in 2017. Deficits will grow $503 billion in 2017, but they will be up to $793 billion in 2026.

As a share of the economy (even though Obama’s gross-domestic product numbers are likely to be lower than stated in the document), the debt stabilizes at 75 percent, yet that’s nothing to brag about since it remains the highest it’s been in our nation’s history with the exception of World War II.

And while the debt went back down after the war, I wouldn’t count on that ever happening on our current spending trajectory.

For one thing, the debt levels in the 1940s were the product of significant increases in war spending and other factors, and thus they naturally went down after the war.

Spending today is not projected to go down anytime soon. In fact, it’s projected to explode.

In other words, unless we get a major breakthrough in technology or a life-altering discovery (which could happen, of course), I wouldn’t count on post-WWII growth levels.

Obama’s increase in debt and deficit is happening in spite of his dream of large revenue collections over the next decade — to $5,669 billion in 2026 (20 percent of GDP) from $3,644 billion in 2017 (18.9 percent of GDP).

Historically, revenue as a share of the economy has averaged 17.4 percent, and the government hasn’t been able to maintain its tax collection above 19 percent for more than a couple of years at a time.

Under the current tax system, Obama won’t be able to collect that much revenue, but it’s still worth looking at how he would like to overtax us.

The budget would increase the taxes on both cigarettes and barrels of oil. It would increase the estate tax. It would slap an additional fee on financial institutions and implement a “Buffet tax.”

It would also raise taxes on some “wealthy business owners” to help delay — not fix — the projected insolvency of Medicare’s hospital trust fund.

It would also reform the corporate income-tax system, with the condition that Uncle Sam will cash out and tax income earned abroad. His repatriation proposal would impose a one-time 14 percent tax on $2.1 trillion worth of tax-deferred offshore corporate profits.

All of these new taxes would pay for new spending like green infrastructure or universal pre-K, and indeed, spending will grow a significant amount over that 10-year widow — to $6,462 billion in 2026 (22.8 percent of GDP) from $4,147 billion in 2017 (21.5 percent of GDP).

But please don’t worry about the debt, deficit, spending and taxes, because — according to Obama’s budget — the economy will continue to grow at current rate levels without any recessions.

This, too, is unlikely, since the country tends to go into recession every five to six years.

Republicans in Congress have already announced that this budget was dead on arrival.

Unfortunately, their own budget will likely keep the bloated spending limits agreed upon during the last spending spree of 2015 and only have the relative merit of driving us into the debt wall at a slower speed than Obama’s budget.

— Veronique de Rugy is a senior research fellow at the Mercatus Center at George Mason University, a columnist for Reason magazine and the Washington Examiner, and blogs about ecomomics for National Review. Click here to contact her, and follow her on Twitter: @veroderugy. Click here to read previous columns. The opinions expressed are her own.

Support Noozhawk Today

You are an important ally in our mission to deliver clear, objective, high-quality professional news reporting for Santa Barbara, Goleta and the rest of Santa Barbara County. Join the Hawks Club today to help keep Noozhawk soaring.

We offer four membership levels: $5 a month, $10 a month, $25 a month or $1 a week. Payments can be made using a credit card, Apple Pay or Google Pay, or click here for information on recurring credit-card payments and a mailing address for checks.

Thank you for your vital support.

Become a Noozhawk Supporter

First name
Last name
Select your monthly membership
Or choose an annual membership

Payment Information

Membership Subscription

You are enrolling in . Thank you for joining the Hawks Club.

Payment Method

Pay by Credit Card:

Mastercard, Visa, American Express, Discover
One click only, please!

Pay with Apple Pay or Google Pay:

Noozhawk partners with Stripe to provide secure invoicing and payments processing.
You may cancel your membership at any time by sending an email to .(JavaScript must be enabled to view this email address).

  • Ask
  • Vote
  • Investigate
  • Answer

Noozhawk Asks: What’s Your Question?

Welcome to Noozhawk Asks, a new feature in which you ask the questions, you help decide what Noozhawk investigates, and you work with us to find the answers.

Here’s how it works: You share your questions with us in the nearby box. In some cases, we may work with you to find the answers. In others, we may ask you to vote on your top choices to help us narrow the scope. And we’ll be regularly asking you for your feedback on a specific issue or topic.

We also expect to work together with the reader who asked the winning questions to find the answer together. Noozhawk’s objective is to come at questions from a place of curiosity and openness, and we believe a transparent collaboration is the key to achieve it.

The results of our investigation will be published here in this Noozhawk Asks section. Once or twice a month, we plan to do a review of what was asked and answered.

Thanks for asking!

Click Here to Get Started >

Reader Comments

Noozhawk is no longer accepting reader comments on our articles. Click here for the announcement. Readers are instead invited to submit letters to the editor by emailing them to [email protected]. Please provide your full name and community, as well as contact information for verification purposes only.

Daily Noozhawk

Subscribe to Noozhawk's A.M. Report, our free e-Bulletin sent out every day at 4:15 a.m. with Noozhawk's top stories, hand-picked by the editors.

Sign Up Now >