Friday, September 4 , 2015, 4:13 am | Fair 64.0º




Santa Barbara to Fight State’s Challenge Over Transfer of City Parking Lots

With the dissolution of RDAs, successor agencies have to sell off real property assets not considered housing or governmental assets

The Granada Garage is one of the Santa Barbara parking structures and lots that the California Department of Finance wants the city to sell. With the dissolution of the Redevelopment Agency, there’s debate about whether parking structures are considered governmental assets and can be transferred to successor agencies instead of being sold.

The Granada Garage is one of the Santa Barbara parking structures and lots that the California Department of Finance wants the city to sell. With the dissolution of the Redevelopment Agency, there’s debate about whether parking structures are considered governmental assets and can be transferred to successor agencies instead of being sold.  (Giana Magnoli / Noozhawk photo)

By Giana Magnoli, Noozhawk Staff Writer | @magnoli |

The City of Santa Barbara will be fighting the California Department of Finance to keep its downtown parking lots and the railroad depot, since the state has challenged Santa Barbara’s move to transfer some property owned by the Redevelopment Agency.

With the dissolution of RDAs, successor agencies — like the city — have to sell off all real property assets that aren’t considered housing or governmental assets.

This issue first came up over the summer, and many California cities wrote to the state Legislature and were able to remove language that separated parking structures from governmental assets.

However, the Department of Finance sent a letter to Santa Barbara on Nov. 17 telling the city to hold off on transferring the parking assets from the RDA to the city, Community Development Director Paul Casey told the City Council last Tuesday.

Since Santa Barbara “raised a big red flag, caused a stink” over the summer, united with many other cities, everyone thought the matter was resolved because the threatening language was removed, Casey said.

The state doesn’t object to transferring housing assets — since the city handed over about $2 million in housing cash it had at the time RDAs were dissolved — or Chase Palm Park and the Ortega Water Treatment Facility, so those actions were made by the City Council last week.

The assets in question — already approved for transfer by a local oversight board — include the Cota and Carrillo streets commuter lots, the 217 Helena St. parking lot, the Garden Street public parking lot, Parking Structure Nos. 2, 6, 10, 11 and 12, the entire railroad depot and parking lot, and the land near the railroad depot where a children’s museum is planned.

Parking structures aren’t considered governmental assets if they’re mixed-use and open to those other than public employees, according to the letter.

Casey, the City Council and City Attorney Steve Wiley argue otherwise, and say the lots are used for public benefit. The city operates the lots in partnership with downtown businesses, and some of the structures were built on city land, and with tax-exempt bonds.

The state is also targeting the city’s railroad depot, parking lot and land earmarked for a children’s museum. Wiley said the city will challenge this in court if the state doesn’t change its mind.

Many of the assets in question were funded by voter-approved grant moneys, tax-exempt bonds or placed on city land, so they’re not purely RDA projects, he added.

“We’ll litigate this before we sell these assets,” Wiley said.

He is putting together a “meet and confer request,” so city leaders can argue their case in Sacramento.

“We’ll argue our case and really encourage (Department of Finance staff) to change their minds, especially when they told the Legislature back in the summer they’d back off on that proposal to require RDAs to sell off their parking lots,” Casey said.

Mayor Helene Schneider said she has been reaching out to other cities to let them know what happened, and has been working with Assemblyman Das Williams’ office in Sacramento.

It’s most likely a statewide policy decision, and Santa Barbara could just be one of the first cities to submit their asset transfer paperwork, Casey said.

While Schneider speculated that the state was trying to “recoup assets” by forcing cities to sell parking lots, City Councilman Grant House called it “grand theft” and “extortion.”

The state does has leverage, Casey noted — many tax revenues filter through the Department of Finance, which “they could hold onto until we comply,” he said.

“Don’t underestimate the creativity of the state to try and get what they want,” Casey said. “Don’t underestimate their shrewdness to try and put the screws to us.”

However, the city will fight back with just as much creativity, he added.

“We’re not going to go easily,” Casey said.

Noozhawk staff writer Giana Magnoli can be reached at .(JavaScript must be enabled to view this email address). Follow Noozhawk on Twitter: @noozhawk, @NoozhawkNews and @NoozhawkBiz. Connect with Noozhawk on Facebook.




comments powered by Disqus

» on 11.27.12 @ 01:51 PM

Would be ridiculous to sell our parking lots to…who? Private investors? They would scalp us!

» on 11.27.12 @ 02:25 PM

Another example of unelected bureaucrats making their own rules regardless of what we, their employers, want!

» on 11.27.12 @ 02:50 PM

It would be terrible to see parking lots in the hands of private ownership…...???

It took a concerted effort by the downtown businesses and Hotchkiss, Rowse, and Francisco to stop the city from imposing confiscatory parking rates.  The excuse: If the parking is so high people will use buses to shop and go out to eat.

If scalping was the end game with private ownership it would not be any different than the anti car factions in city government.  It would also put the land tax back in effect benefiting the general fund.

» on 11.28.12 @ 10:31 PM

I love the consequences…of brilliant government management of finances.

Support Noozhawk Today

You are an important ally in our mission to deliver clear, objective, high-quality professional news reporting for Santa Barbara, Goleta and the rest of Santa Barbara County. Join the Hawks Club today to help keep Noozhawk soaring.

We offer four membership levels: $5 a month, $10 a month, $25 a month or $1 a week. Payments can be made through PayPal below, or click here for information on recurring credit-card payments.

Thank you for your vital support.

 

Daily Noozhawk

Subscribe to Noozhawk's A.M. Report, our free e-Bulletin sent out every day at 4:15 a.m. with Noozhawk's top stories, hand-picked by the editors.