Tuesday, April 24 , 2018, 6:02 am | Fog/Mist 51º

 
 
 
 

Joe Conason: Rogue FBI Agents Deface Democracy

Whatever the outcome on Tuesday, our political system crossed a disturbing Rubicon during the days leading up to that climax: For the first time in recent memory, officials of the nation's premier law-enforcement agency sought to influence a national election with illicit leaks.

Murky information about investigations of Hillary Clinton's emails and the Clinton Foundation, even fraudulent rumors of "indictments" have flooded the media.

All somehow traced back to the FBI — with Rudolph Giuliani of the Donald Trump campaign boasting on Fox News that he had advance knowledge of these manipulations.

Owing to his longstanding connections with the bureau, Giuliani had predicted "a couple of surprises" to come in late October, just days before FBI director James Comey sent his fateful letter to Congress about reviewing new emails in the Clinton case he closed last July.

"You'll see, and I think it will be enormously effective," he said on Fox News. In fact. Giuliani had joined in publicly pressuring Comey for months, claiming to know of a "revolt" among agents against the decision not to prosecute Clinton.

Having covered the New York FBI office for more than 30 years, reporter Wayne Barrett drew the connections between Giuliani, former FBI supervisor James Kallstrom (also a vocal Trump supporter), and the leaks that have plagued the Clinton campaign during this final week in the Daily Beast.

Among the handful of real charitable donations ever made by Trump are some generous payments to a charity headed by Kallstrom — who, like Giuliani, predicted last summer that disgruntled agents might reveal "a lot more of the facts" about the email probe "come out in the next few months."

Now perhaps those agents — along with Giuliani, Kallstrom and their friend Donald Trump — just don't understand that there was nothing scandalous, let alone criminal, in Clinton's decision to use a private email account like her predecessor Colin Powell.

Perhaps they don't understand that Clinton's handling of "classified" emails — characterized as "extremely careless" by Comey, in one of his departures from normal Justice Department practice — was altogether routine in the federal government, where classification standards vary by department and change often.

Perhaps they also don't understand why Comey found the evidence showed no bad intent by Clinton or the lawyers who reviewed her emails to delete personal material.

And perhaps they don't realize why the public integrity professionals at the Justice Department rejected their ridiculous determination to investigate the Clinton Foundation, based on discredited accusations in a book created and publicized by the political extremist who later became the chief executive of Trump's campaign.

(The reported eagerness of federal agents to pursue the canards in that book doesn't reflect well on their forensic skills, but that's a different problem.)

It is more likely that the FBI agents involved in this operation — including Comey, a former U. S. attorney and deputy attorney general — do understand why prosecutors didn't file charges, but simply don't care because they are right-wing ideologues with a partisan preference.

But that distinction doesn't matter much, because in either case they have violated their oaths and their duty as federal agents, by seeking to influence this election through leaks.

Leaking investigative material is always a violation of the rules that govern the judicial system — which protect the rights of all citizens. In the days and weeks before an election, violating those rules to achieve a partisan objective is an assault on democracy.

During the last presidential election cycle, Attorney General Eric Holder reminded all employees of the Justice Department, including every FBI agent, of the rules that govern their conduct in a March 2012 memorandum titled "Election Year Sensitivities":

"Simply put, politics must play no role in the decisions of federal investigators or prosecutors regarding any investigations or criminal charges.

"Law enforcement officers and prosecutors may never select the timing of investigative steps or criminal charges for the purpose of affecting any election, or for the purpose of giving an advantage or disadvantage to any candidate or political party.

"Such a purpose is inconsistent with the Department's mission and with the Principles of Federal Prosecution."

That was mild language to describe despicable behavior. In a police state, government prosecutors and police agents aim to control politics from the shadows. In a democracy, law enforcement officials are prohibited from influencing elections.

What the rogue FBI agents have done over these past few days is all too similar to the standard practice in Putin's Russia and other authoritarian states — and far below the American constitutional standard that those agents swore to uphold.

Joe Conason is editor in chief of NationalMemo.com. Click here to contact him, follow him on Twitter: @JoeConason, or click here to read previous columns. The opinions expressed are his own.

  • Ask
  • Vote
  • Investigate
  • Answer

Noozhawk Asks: What’s Your Question?

Welcome to Noozhawk Asks, a new feature in which you ask the questions, you help decide what Noozhawk investigates, and you work with us to find the answers.

Here’s how it works: You share your questions with us in the nearby box. In some cases, we may work with you to find the answers. In others, we may ask you to vote on your top choices to help us narrow the scope. And we’ll be regularly asking you for your feedback on a specific issue or topic.

We also expect to work together with the reader who asked the winning questions to find the answer together. Noozhawk’s objective is to come at questions from a place of curiosity and openness, and we believe a transparent collaboration is the key to achieve it.

The results of our investigation will be published here in this Noozhawk Asks section. Once or twice a month, we plan to do a review of what was asked and answered.

Thanks for asking!

Click Here to Get Started >

Support Noozhawk Today

You are an important ally in our mission to deliver clear, objective, high-quality professional news reporting for Santa Barbara, Goleta and the rest of Santa Barbara County. Join the Hawks Club today to help keep Noozhawk soaring.

We offer four membership levels: $5 a month, $10 a month, $25 a month or $1 a week. Payments can be made through PayPal below, or click here for information on recurring credit-card payments.

Thank you for your vital support.


Maestro, Mastercard, Visa, American Express, Discover, Debit

Reader Comments

Noozhawk is no longer accepting reader comments on our articles. Click here for the announcement. Readers are instead invited to submit letters to the editor by emailing them to [email protected]. Please provide your full name and community, as well as contact information for verification purposes only.

Daily Noozhawk

Subscribe to Noozhawk's A.M. Report, our free e-Bulletin sent out every day at 4:15 a.m. with Noozhawk's top stories, hand-picked by the editors.

Sign Up Now >