Thursday, October 18 , 2018, 10:40 pm | Fair 58º

 
 
 
 

Trent Benedetti: Should the American System Change?

As Americans, we enjoy a standard of living about which most of the world’s people fantasize. Americans are limited only by our ability to dream and our willingness to work hard making our dreams come true.

Each of us has God-given talents that make us unique and which help us frame the life choices we make. As Americans, we are free to live as we choose and to own what we deem necessary to pursue our choices.

In fact, philosopher John Locke believed securing for everyone life, liberty and property was the purpose of government. Locke’s view differed from the view of another well-known although considerably less principled philosopher, Niccolò  Machiavelli.

For Machiavelli, the purpose of government was nothing but the acquisition, retention and expansion of power. For him, the end justified the means and therefore, he advocated doing whatever was necessary to achieve the desired end.

America’s Founding Fathers looked to Locke. His thoughts on social contract — the legitimacy of the state’s authority over the individual — influenced the writings of Alexander Hamilton, Thomas Jefferson, James Madison and other men who risked their very lives in pursuit of the ideals upon which our nation was founded.

Locke’s social contract was based upon the voluntary but conditional transfer of rights from the people to the government for the purpose of securing life, liberty and property for all. He viewed government as a trustee with delegated powers to be used only in service to the people.

Locke believed freedom of thought, speech and worship were inviolate and government had a duty to protect them. Similarly, he believed government should protect an individual’s private property.

From the beginning, property rights have been recognized in the United States as foundational to a free society. Our second president, John Adams, affirmed “Property is surely a right of mankind as really as liberty.” The Fifth Amendment to our Constitution prohibits confiscation of private property “without due process of law.”

Private property is integral to our American system. At the same time, none of us can exercise property rights in a manner that infringes upon others’ rights. We have a very well developed body of laws, rules and regulations to prevent inappropriate intrusion by one upon another.

For this purpose, we have a plethora of bodies, boards, commissions, councils and departments. They develop and revise land use plans; manage and monitor fresh water resources; observe and enforce air quality standards; guard against threats to public health and safety; and the list goes on.

In California, private property rights are regulated comprehensively. Some think they are over-regulated, although no responsible person advocates for doing away with all regulation.

We do, however, have some who want further limitations on property rights, including some who would abolish them outright. With increasing regularity, those who want to limit or abolish private property openly embrace the views of Karl Marx.

Marx advocated for the abolition of private property in The Communist Manifesto, a book he co-authored.

Those seeking to change our system embrace greater limitations on private property because ending private ownership is critical to the system change they seek.

Unfortunately, we have elected representatives who align themselves politically with those who would change our system. It’s fair to wonder if they actually embrace Marxist philosophy or are nothing more than loathsome politicians who, like Machiavelli, are willing to say or do anything to keep or gain elected office for the intoxicating illusion of power it provides to them. Either way, we deserve better.

Perhaps we should change those who represent us but not the American system. It’s the envy of the world.  

— Trent Benedetti is a member of the board of directors of the Committee to Improve North County and a longtime local business owner. Click here to read previous columns. The opinions expressed are his own.

Support Noozhawk Today

You are an important ally in our mission to deliver clear, objective, high-quality professional news reporting for Santa Barbara, Goleta and the rest of Santa Barbara County. Join the Hawks Club today to help keep Noozhawk soaring.

We offer four membership levels: $5 a month, $10 a month, $25 a month or $1 a week. Payments can be made using a credit card, Apple Pay or Google Pay, or click here for information on recurring credit-card payments and a mailing address for checks.

Thank you for your vital support.

Become a Noozhawk Supporter

First name
Last name
Email
Select your monthly membership
Or choose an annual membership
×

Payment Information

Membership Subscription

You are enrolling in . Thank you for joining the Hawks Club.

Payment Method

Pay by Credit Card:

Mastercard, Visa, American Express, Discover
One click only, please!

Pay with Apple Pay or Google Pay:

Noozhawk partners with Stripe to provide secure invoicing and payments processing.
You may cancel your membership at any time by sending an email to .(JavaScript must be enabled to view this email address).

  • Ask
  • Vote
  • Investigate
  • Answer

Noozhawk Asks: What’s Your Question?

Welcome to Noozhawk Asks, a new feature in which you ask the questions, you help decide what Noozhawk investigates, and you work with us to find the answers.

Here’s how it works: You share your questions with us in the nearby box. In some cases, we may work with you to find the answers. In others, we may ask you to vote on your top choices to help us narrow the scope. And we’ll be regularly asking you for your feedback on a specific issue or topic.

We also expect to work together with the reader who asked the winning questions to find the answer together. Noozhawk’s objective is to come at questions from a place of curiosity and openness, and we believe a transparent collaboration is the key to achieve it.

The results of our investigation will be published here in this Noozhawk Asks section. Once or twice a month, we plan to do a review of what was asked and answered.

Thanks for asking!

Click Here to Get Started >

Reader Comments

Noozhawk is no longer accepting reader comments on our articles. Click here for the announcement. Readers are instead invited to submit letters to the editor by emailing them to [email protected]. Please provide your full name and community, as well as contact information for verification purposes only.