Santa Barbara County was one of six local jurisdictions included in an audit report issued by the state auditor on March 28 regarding local jurisdictions’ role in cannabis licensing.

The state auditor did not make formal recommendations to the county that require further action, but the county will be using the information in the report to enhance its practices.

The audit included the counties of Santa Barbara and Monterey and the cities of Fresno, Sacramento, San Diego, and South Lake Tahoe. The audit, can be found here.

The audit’s objective was to review and evaluate the permitting process for cannabis. The state auditor looked at several items with a focus on fairness; following procedures; creating policies and procedures that comply with local laws; and adopting ordinances or creating policies to regulate cannabis permitting and making that information public.

The state auditor noted that all the local jurisdictions’ policies and procedures complied with relevant state and local laws and regulations, and Santa Barbara County was noted for following best practices in clearly communicating information to the public on the permit process.

“While there are no specific recommendations required of us and the audit found no financial or legal deficiencies, we acknowledge the value in assessing and enhancing processes related to issuing local permits,” said Nancy Anderson, chief assistant county executive officer, who serves as the Compliance and Accountability officer for the county. “Our team has reviewed the information in the report to improve our cannabis licensing, to foster accountability and transparency.”

Some of the improvements the county will be making to enhance its practices are to implement a blind scoring process into portions of the application; to not only document failed background checks but also passed background checks; and to have all staff involved in the cannabis business license approval process to go on the record with an impartiality statement for each application.

The audit highlighted some of the actions the county has already taken as best practices, such as allowing appeals of denied cannabis business applications; contracting with a third party for initial review; and clearly providing information for the public, including a flow chart that illustrates the online application process.

The county’s full response to the general recommendations made can be found here.