Pixel Tracker

Saturday, January 19 , 2019, 7:52 am | Fair 45º

 
 
 
 

Maria Fotopoulos: Illegal Immigrants Won’t Fix the Social Security Pyramid Scheme

With 16% of Americans unemployed or underemployed, now is not the time to 'expand' the workforce

Immigration — both legal and illegal — works against repairing Social Security and Medicare.

Taking a page out of the playbook of Rahm Emanuel, President Barack Obama’s chief of staff, the proponents of amnesty for illegal immigrants are not letting any serious crisis go to waste.

Recently the trustees for Medicare and Social Security announced that the trust funds will run out of money sooner — two years sooner for Medicare (projected insolvent date is 2017) and four years sooner than last year’s projections for Social Security (projected insolvent date 2037). In response, several proponents argued that amnesty was the solution for these problems when, in fact, it will ultimately make the problems much worse.

First, it should be recognized that Social Security and Medicare are structured like giant Ponzi or pyramid schemes where today’s workers support today’s retirees. These are “pay-as-you-go” programs.

According to a 2005 Cato Institute report titled “Social Security: Follow the Math,” in 1950 there were 16 workers paying taxes into the Social Security and Medicare systems for every retiree. The same report indicated the ratio in 2005 was three workers for every retiree. Instead of correcting the pyramid scheme nature of Social Security and Medicare, proponents of illegal immigrants as a cure are hoping we will buy into the plan to just “kick the can” down the road. Ultimately the plan will fail for the same reason all pyramid schemes run out of gas (think Bernie Madoff!). It is mathematically impossible for enough workers to enter the system to support the retirees in the system.

In truth, the only way to permanently fix both Social Security and Medicare is to emphasize programs that would reduce the population of the United States and encourage higher skill levels of its. This would generate higher incomes through the dynamics of supply and demand. Programs could then be put in place to encourage additional savings to supplement lower payments under Social Security.

Former Fed chairman Alan Greenspan — a co-creator of the housing, asset and credit bubbles that began bursting in 2008 — indicated in his 2009 testimony to the Senate Judiciary Committee’s Subcommittee on Immigration, Refugees and Border Security that increasing immigration “would lower wage premiums of skilled over lesser skilled” workers. In other words, increasing immigration would decrease the income of a large part of the working class — Americans who Greenspan calls the “privileged elite whose incomes are being supported at noncompetitively high rates by immigration quotas.”

The prepared testimony of Greenspan, an advocate of increased immigration, seems to indicate our Social Security and Medicare funding problems can be fixed by lowering the average worker’s compensation.

A June 2007 Heritage Foundation report, “Amnesty Will Cost U.S. Taxpayers at Least $2.6 Trillion,” prepared by Robert E. Rector, concluded that amnesty for illegal immigrants would greatly increase long-term taxpayer costs.

“Granting amnesty to illegal immigrants would, over time, increase their use of means-tested welfare, Social Security and Medicare,” wrote Rector. “Fiscal costs would rise in the intermediate term and increase dramatically when amnesty recipients reach retirement.”

Rector estimated that granting amnesty to 10 million adult illegal immigrants would result in a net retirement cost to taxpayers of more than $2.6 trillion — plus or minus depending on variables. Californians for Population Stabilization believes the actual number of those who would potentially receive amnesty is closer to 20 million than 10 million.

With approximately 16 percent of U.S. citizens either unemployed or working part-time but looking for full-time positions, legalizing illegal immigrants (many of whom are currently unemployed) would put a substantial additional burden on the various agencies and programs (including food stamps) that are attempting to provide benefits to unemployed Americans.

Amnesty for illegal immigrants (as well as increased legal immigration) would not solve the current Social Security and Medicare funding problems. In fact, this approach would:

» Lower the salary of the average American worker.

» Place additional burdens on already strained agencies and programs attempting to provide for unemployed American workers.

» Ultimately result in significant unfunded liabilities in these plans that could be greater than $2.6 trillion.

Legalizing illegal immigrants and increasing legal immigration clearly are the wrong ideas at the wrong time.

— Maria Fotopoulos is a senior writing fellow for Californians for Population Stabilization, syndicated by Cagle Cartoons. Contact her at [email protected] and follow her on Twitter: @TurboDog50. Click here for additional columns. The opinions expressed are her own.

Support Noozhawk Today

You are an important ally in our mission to deliver clear, objective, high-quality professional news reporting for Santa Barbara, Goleta and the rest of Santa Barbara County. Join the Hawks Club today to help keep Noozhawk soaring.

We offer four membership levels: $5 a month, $10 a month, $25 a month or $1 a week. Payments can be made using a credit card, Apple Pay or Google Pay, or click here for information on recurring credit-card payments and a mailing address for checks.

Thank you for your vital support.

Become a Noozhawk Supporter

First name
Last name
Email
Select your monthly membership
Or choose an annual membership
×

Payment Information

Membership Subscription

You are enrolling in . Thank you for joining the Hawks Club.

Payment Method

Pay by Credit Card:

Mastercard, Visa, American Express, Discover
One click only, please!

Pay with Apple Pay or Google Pay:

Noozhawk partners with Stripe to provide secure invoicing and payments processing.
You may cancel your membership at any time by sending an email to .(JavaScript must be enabled to view this email address).

  • Ask
  • Vote
  • Investigate
  • Answer

Noozhawk Asks: What’s Your Question?

Welcome to Noozhawk Asks, a new feature in which you ask the questions, you help decide what Noozhawk investigates, and you work with us to find the answers.

Here’s how it works: You share your questions with us in the nearby box. In some cases, we may work with you to find the answers. In others, we may ask you to vote on your top choices to help us narrow the scope. And we’ll be regularly asking you for your feedback on a specific issue or topic.

We also expect to work together with the reader who asked the winning questions to find the answer together. Noozhawk’s objective is to come at questions from a place of curiosity and openness, and we believe a transparent collaboration is the key to achieve it.

The results of our investigation will be published here in this Noozhawk Asks section. Once or twice a month, we plan to do a review of what was asked and answered.

Thanks for asking!

Click Here to Get Started >

Reader Comments

Noozhawk is no longer accepting reader comments on our articles. Click here for the announcement. Readers are instead invited to submit letters to the editor by emailing them to [email protected]. Please provide your full name and community, as well as contact information for verification purposes only.