Monday, February 19 , 2018, 11:40 am | Fair 55º

 
 
 
 

Brian Goebel: Wishing We Were Wrong About Political Paralysis

We see little chance that the next president and congressional leaders will take sensible steps to improve the economy for all Americans.

We may not be Nostradamus, but we’ve been compiling an impressive track record of accurate predictions over the past year. We correctly predicted that ISIS would adopt a “far enemy” strategy before the Paris attacks, that the Republican Party would come unglued (this seems less impressive in hindsight), that the West would need a plan for dealing with the “leftovers” as ISIS’ losses on the battlefield mounted, and that President Barack Obama’s anti-inversion regulations would be challenged for exceeding his legal authority (like his immigration policies).

That latter prediction was confirmed last week when the U.S. Chamber of Commerce sued to invalidate the regulations, which reflect the utter failure of Obama and Congress to cooperate on corporate tax reform.

As we previously argued, corporate tax reform is about as close to a “no-brainer” as it gets in federal public policy. We would love to predict that the incoming president and congressional leaders will solve this problem in first 100 days.

There is ample room for a bipartisan deal and the economic benefits of repatriating trillions of dollars and improving our global competitiveness would be widespread and immediate.

Similarly, we would love to predict that the next president’s 100-day economic plan would include fixing infrastructure funding and spending. Here, too, there is ample room for a bipartisan deal.

No Labels has documented broad support for a proposal to raise the gas tax and split the increased revenue in thirds to reduce income taxes, reduce the deficit and fund the Highway Trust Fund. Such a policy would produce economic benefits for all Americans (and aid the environment).

Lastly, in a rational world in which elected officials put country before party and problem solving before personal gain, our next president and congressional leaders would make and adhere to a commitment to “regular order” in the budgeting and appropriations process. Simply restoring a practice that was once routine would enable businesses across the country to eliminate unnecessary costs, plan more effectively and invest more aggressively.

This simple step, which would not cost the government a penny, would contribute to economic growth. Indeed, if our next president and congressional leaders accomplished only these three simple reforms and literally nothing else for the next four years, our economy would be much stronger than it is today for all Americans.

Robert M. Gates, our acclaimed former defense secretary, remains “optimistic” that the right kinds of leaders can overcome the “government gridlock” and “political paralysis” that have prevented economic growth.

Sadly, these leaders are in short supply. Although Hillary Clinton and Donald Trump have discussed corporate taxation and infrastructure spending, neither has offered an approach that is likely to gain congressional support; rather, they appear to be doubling-down on policy prescriptions that have proven to be nonstarters in the past.

To predict progress on sensible economic policy reforms, therefore, would seriously threaten our streak. So, today we’re going to play it safe and predict the status quo — anemic economic growth and no progress on these three policy issues in 2017 — and root against ourselves starting in January.

— Brian Goebel is editor in chief of the nonpartisan 2040 Matters, a Santa Barbara-based public policy blog dedicated to restoring the American Dream for “Generation X+” and future generations by combating declining civic engagement and offering alternatives to political polarization. Click here for previous columns. The opinions expressed are his own.

  • Ask
  • Vote
  • Investigate
  • Answer

Noozhawk Asks: What’s Your Question?

Welcome to Noozhawk Asks, a new feature in which you ask the questions, you help decide what Noozhawk investigates, and you work with us to find the answers.

Here’s how it works: You share your questions with us in the nearby box. In some cases, we may work with you to find the answers. In others, we may ask you to vote on your top choices to help us narrow the scope. And we’ll be regularly asking you for your feedback on a specific issue or topic.

We also expect to work together with the reader who asked the winning questions to find the answer together. Noozhawk’s objective is to come at questions from a place of curiosity and openness, and we believe a transparent collaboration is the key to achieve it.

The results of our investigation will be published here in this Noozhawk Asks section. Once or twice a month, we plan to do a review of what was asked and answered.

Thanks for asking!

Click here to get started >

Support Noozhawk Today

You are an important ally in our mission to deliver clear, objective, high-quality professional news reporting for Santa Barbara, Goleta and the rest of Santa Barbara County. Join the Hawks Club today to help keep Noozhawk soaring.

We offer four membership levels: $5 a month, $10 a month, $25 a month or $1 a week. Payments can be made through PayPal below, or click here for information on recurring credit-card payments.

Thank you for your vital support.



Reader Comments

Noozhawk is no longer accepting reader comments on our articles. Click here for the announcement. Readers are instead invited to submit letters to the editor by emailing them to [email protected]. Please provide your full name and community, as well as contact information for verification purposes only.

Daily Noozhawk

Subscribe to Noozhawk's A.M. Report, our free e-Bulletin sent out every day at 4:15 a.m. with Noozhawk's top stories, hand-picked by the editors.

Sign Up Now >