Pixel Tracker

Saturday, December 15 , 2018, 6:35 am | Fair 42º


Dick Polman: Wisconsin Judicial Election More Evidence That Democratic Wave Underway

Last week in Wisconsin, a state governed by Koch Brothers subsidiary, Gov. Scott Walker, 1 million voters cast ballots to fill a seat on the state Supreme Court.

I’ve long argued that judicial elections are idiotic — judges should be immune to partisan politics; they shouldn’t make campaign promises — but such are the rules in states like Wisconsin.

And sure enough, the race featured two lower-court judges with overtly partisan brands: Right-wing Walker clone and National Rifle Association fave Michael Screnock, and anti-Donald Trump progressive Rebecca Dallet.

The race was called within minutes of the polls’ closing. Dallet eviscerated Screnock by 12 percentage points.

It was the first time in 23 years that a progressive (the traditional Wisconsin word for “liberal”) won an open seat on the state’s highest court, and it prompted Walker to freak out on Twitter: “Tonight’s results show we are at risk of a #BlueWave in Wisconsin ... we need conservatives to take action and stop a #BlueWave.”

It’s the second time this year that Walker has clanged the alarm. Back in the winter, there was a special election for a vacant state Senate seat, in a rural-red district where 59 percent of the 2016 voters had supported Trump, a district where the previous state Senate Republican candidate had won the seat by a margin of 26 points.

But 10 weeks ago, in a huge switcheroo, the Democratic candidate snatched the rural-red seat by a margin of nine points. The reasons were obvious: blue voters were stoked to turn out; red voters were too dispirited to show up. Some even switched sides.

In 2016, Trump easily won Wisconsin’s Eighth Congressional District, in the state’s northeastern corner; on April 3, Dallet won the district’s voters by five points. Trump also won the Third Congressional District, in the state’s southwestern corner; on April 4, Dallet swept the district’s voters by a whopping 16 points.

In the words of Washington Republican analyst Rich Galen, “this election was so one-sided that, taken along with Pennsylvania (a reference to last month’s upset Democratic win in a special House election), it may be another precursor of things to come on Nov. 6.”

Walker, fearing more losses, has even tried to cancel a pair of Wisconsin special elections. Last winter, he appointed two state legislators to fill posts in his regime. Then he refused to schedule special elections to fill their seats. I kid you not.

He claimed in various statements that the elections were “unnecessary” and a “waste of taxpayer resources,” but it was obvious that he and his Republican allies were terrified that a blue wave would sweep those seats away — further confirming the national trend. Since Trump took the oath as president, 39 state legislative seats have flipped from red to blue (only four have flipped from blue to red), and the Republican Party would prefer not to suffer more humiliations.

Alas, Wisconsin law requires that legislative vacancies be promptly filled, for the self-evident reason that citizens deserve to be represented. This is called democracy, a concept that appears to flummox Republicans in the age of Trump.

Walker was speedily sued in court for his failure to follow the law. A few weeks ago, a judge — whom Walker has appointed to the bench — ruled that he had a “plain and positive duty” to schedule those special elections.

Walker refused to obey. He went to the state appeals court. He lost again. Earlier this year an appeals judge ruled: “Representative government and the election of our representatives are never ‘unnecessary,’ never ‘a waste of taxpayer resources.’ (Walker) has an obligation to the follow the law.”

Walker finally gave up and scheduled the two contests for June.

Could there possibly be better evidence of Republican panic than their bright idea of canceling elections? Wisconsin’s judicial tally is merely their latest grim portent. As Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell, R-Ky., said last week, “We know the wind is going to be in our face. We don’t know whether it’s going to be a Category 3, 4 or 5.”

Show of hands, please. Who’s up for a Category 5?

Dick Polman is the national political columnist at NewsWorks/WHYY in Philadelphia, a “writer in residence” at the University of Pennsylvania and is syndicated by Cagle Cartoons. Email him at [email protected] and follow him on Twitter: @DickPolman1. Click here for previous columns. The opinions expressed are his own.

Support Noozhawk Today

You are an important ally in our mission to deliver clear, objective, high-quality professional news reporting for Santa Barbara, Goleta and the rest of Santa Barbara County. Join the Hawks Club today to help keep Noozhawk soaring.

We offer four membership levels: $5 a month, $10 a month, $25 a month or $1 a week. Payments can be made using a credit card, Apple Pay or Google Pay, or click here for information on recurring credit-card payments and a mailing address for checks.

Thank you for your vital support.

Become a Noozhawk Supporter

First name
Last name
Select your monthly membership
Or choose an annual membership

Payment Information

Membership Subscription

You are enrolling in . Thank you for joining the Hawks Club.

Payment Method

Pay by Credit Card:

Mastercard, Visa, American Express, Discover
One click only, please!

Pay with Apple Pay or Google Pay:

Noozhawk partners with Stripe to provide secure invoicing and payments processing.
You may cancel your membership at any time by sending an email to .(JavaScript must be enabled to view this email address).

  • Ask
  • Vote
  • Investigate
  • Answer

Noozhawk Asks: What’s Your Question?

Welcome to Noozhawk Asks, a new feature in which you ask the questions, you help decide what Noozhawk investigates, and you work with us to find the answers.

Here’s how it works: You share your questions with us in the nearby box. In some cases, we may work with you to find the answers. In others, we may ask you to vote on your top choices to help us narrow the scope. And we’ll be regularly asking you for your feedback on a specific issue or topic.

We also expect to work together with the reader who asked the winning questions to find the answer together. Noozhawk’s objective is to come at questions from a place of curiosity and openness, and we believe a transparent collaboration is the key to achieve it.

The results of our investigation will be published here in this Noozhawk Asks section. Once or twice a month, we plan to do a review of what was asked and answered.

Thanks for asking!

Click Here to Get Started >

Reader Comments

Noozhawk is no longer accepting reader comments on our articles. Click here for the announcement. Readers are instead invited to submit letters to the editor by emailing them to [email protected]. Please provide your full name and community, as well as contact information for verification purposes only.

Daily Noozhawk

Subscribe to Noozhawk's A.M. Report, our free e-Bulletin sent out every day at 4:15 a.m. with Noozhawk's top stories, hand-picked by the editors.

Sign Up Now >