Pixel Tracker

Friday, November 16 , 2018, 6:42 pm | Fog/Mist Smoke 59º

 
 
 
 

Joe Guzzardi: Jerry Brown, ‘California Dreamin,’ About to Face Costly Reality Check

A few weeks ago, I turned down an all-expenses-paid invitation to attend a late summer conference in San Francisco. After my 2016 visit to the Bay City, I vowed never to return. San Francisco is, to put it gently, an undesirable destination.

Since most of California’s major cities are as unpleasant as San Francisco, I’ll likely never return to my native state.

I left California in 2008 because of acute overcrowding and a state government determined to make living conditions worse for its residents, especially those already struggling in the lower economic bracket.

A comprehensive listing of all California’s failures would be an 800-page treatise. But a brief summary of the financial consequences of Sacramento-induced woes follows.

For eight years, Gov. Jerry Brown has ignored multiple red flags that a responsible leader would recognize as a call for immediate directional change.

While Brown is taking bows for leaving his as yet unelected successor with a $6.1 billion surplus, nonpartisan analysts view California’s finances more pessimistically.

Last year, a California Policy Center report found that state and local debt totals $1.3 trillion. Another study pegs California’s debt at $2.3 trillion, while the Capital Research Center calculated that the state has $1 trillion in pension liability alone, an average $77,000 per household. The CRC report’s subtitle accurately stated: “Governments Continue to Understate Massive Unfunded Liabilities on Public Employee Pensions.”

Brown’s math on California’s infrastructure upgrading requirement is equally flawed. He claims that California needs $187 billion to repair dam and road damage. Again, nonpartisan analysts came up with more overwhelming totals. The Bay Area Council Economic Institute put California’s unfunded infrastructure requirements at $737 billion or possibly as high as $765 billion.

Meanwhile, low- and middle-income taxpayers fed up with expensive housing and too few good jobs can’t leave California fast enough. The exiting masses doubtlessly anticipate that California’s recently elected and its 2018 candidates will usher in an era of fiscal and public policy that will further work against the state’s poorest.

Exhibit A: When SB1, the California gas tax, goes into effect next year, motorists will pay 76.7 cents per gallon in total taxes and fees. Diesel fuel will cost more.

Finally, Exhibit B, Brown’s pet project, the California bullet train, which some won’t live long enough to ride and others have no interest in traveling on, is still on the drawing board.

Assuming it’s eventually completed — a huge leap of faith — initial service is projected to begin in 2029, and the Los Angeles to San Francisco route, 2033. The current cost estimate, revised upward three times since 2012, could reach more than $98 billion.

An affordable housing crisis, homelessness, poverty and a raging drug epidemic should encourage California to perform a reality check. With California teetering on the brink, the state can't risk adding more people to its nearly 40 million population, a goal California’s leadership promotes.

State Attorney General Xavier Becerra, Sen. Kamala Harris, D-Calif., 2016 winners and most of the 2018 candidates like Gavin Newsom for governor and Kevin de León for U.S. Senate favor much higher immigration levels that will mean more job competition for the lower-skilled, underemployed or unemployed Californians already residing in the state.

Becerra has filed 35 lawsuits against President Donald Trump’s administration, including some aimed at thwarting White House efforts to limit refugee resettlement and to remove convicted criminal aliens.

With its massive debt, California’s first priority should be to stabilize its population. More people means more financial obligations, a recipe for more trouble ahead.

— Joe Guzzardi is an analyst and researcher with Progressives for Immigration Reform who now lives in Pittsburgh. He can be reached at [email protected], or follow him on Twitter: @joeguzzardi19. Click here to read previous columns. The opinions expressed are his own.

Support Noozhawk Today

You are an important ally in our mission to deliver clear, objective, high-quality professional news reporting for Santa Barbara, Goleta and the rest of Santa Barbara County. Join the Hawks Club today to help keep Noozhawk soaring.

We offer four membership levels: $5 a month, $10 a month, $25 a month or $1 a week. Payments can be made using a credit card, Apple Pay or Google Pay, or click here for information on recurring credit-card payments and a mailing address for checks.

Thank you for your vital support.

Become a Noozhawk Supporter

First name
Last name
Email
Select your monthly membership
Or choose an annual membership
×

Payment Information

Membership Subscription

You are enrolling in . Thank you for joining the Hawks Club.

Payment Method

Pay by Credit Card:

Mastercard, Visa, American Express, Discover
One click only, please!

Pay with Apple Pay or Google Pay:

Noozhawk partners with Stripe to provide secure invoicing and payments processing.
You may cancel your membership at any time by sending an email to .(JavaScript must be enabled to view this email address).

  • Ask
  • Vote
  • Investigate
  • Answer

Noozhawk Asks: What’s Your Question?

Welcome to Noozhawk Asks, a new feature in which you ask the questions, you help decide what Noozhawk investigates, and you work with us to find the answers.

Here’s how it works: You share your questions with us in the nearby box. In some cases, we may work with you to find the answers. In others, we may ask you to vote on your top choices to help us narrow the scope. And we’ll be regularly asking you for your feedback on a specific issue or topic.

We also expect to work together with the reader who asked the winning questions to find the answer together. Noozhawk’s objective is to come at questions from a place of curiosity and openness, and we believe a transparent collaboration is the key to achieve it.

The results of our investigation will be published here in this Noozhawk Asks section. Once or twice a month, we plan to do a review of what was asked and answered.

Thanks for asking!

Click Here to Get Started >

Reader Comments

Noozhawk is no longer accepting reader comments on our articles. Click here for the announcement. Readers are instead invited to submit letters to the editor by emailing them to [email protected]. Please provide your full name and community, as well as contact information for verification purposes only.