Tuesday, May 22 , 2018, 2:55 pm | Overcast 66º


Peter Funt: Fix the National Parks, Not the Fees

Three years ago this month, returning to my hotel room in Flagstaff, Ariz., I wrote:

At least once in a lifetime every American should lay eyes on the Grand Canyon, whose brilliant colors and dazzling erosional landscape inspire a kind of planetary patriotism. Stretching 277 miles long and a mile deep, it is perhaps our nation’s greatest natural treasure.

I went on to express sadness over a decision by the National Park Service to raise admission to $30 per car from $25 — a five-dollar hike! Our parks should be free, I argued, and Congress was being stingy by failing to pony up the relatively small sum needed to make that possible.

Which brings us to the recent announcement by the Interior Department that peak-season fees at our 17 most popular parks will jump to $70 per car, if President Donald Trump’s administration has its way. The cost to hike into one of the parks on foot would double to $30.

The new fees would raise about $70 million a year, according to government estimates. To help put that into perspective: Congress has allocated $120 million per year to provide security for Trump’s family.

Under a formula established by Congress, each national park retains 80 percent of its admission fees, and shares the balance with other parks that do not charge fees.

But according to the NPS, the sole reason for charging fees in the first place is that Congress won’t allocate funds needed to maintain roads and essential infrastructure at the largest national parks.

In announcing the new visitor fees, Interior Secretary Ryan Zinke said the additional money is needed for repairs to “help ensure that (parks) are protected and preserved in perpetuity.”

Zinke’s misguided plan is to foist the higher fees on visitors during “peak season” — which is to say, when kids are out of school, their parents are able to vacation and weather at the parks is at its best.

Under the proposal, new peak season entrance fees would be established at 17 locations. The NPS has the audacity to add, via its website, that the hikes are “part of its commitment to improve the visitor experience.”

Meanwhile, the Trump administration has quietly proposed big cuts to the NPS budget.

What can you do? This is a rare case when public outcry might actually help. Click here to register a complaint with the NPS. The window for comments closes Nov. 23.

“We should not increase fees to such a degree as to make these places, protected for all Americans to experience, unaffordable for some families,” said Theresa Pierno, head of the National Parks Conservation Association.

To which I’d add: If Trump prefers a country-club nation of haves and have-nots, this new gambit fits right in.

Pulitzer Prize-winning author and environmentalist Wallace Stegner called our national parks “the best idea we ever had.” Doubling the price of visiting them is clearly one of the worst.

Peter Funt is a writer, speaker and author of the book, Cautiously Optimistic. He is syndicated by Cagle Cartoons and can be contacted at www.candidcamera.com. Click here for previous columns. The opinions expressed are his own.

Support Noozhawk Today

You are an important ally in our mission to deliver clear, objective, high-quality professional news reporting for Santa Barbara, Goleta and the rest of Santa Barbara County. Join the Hawks Club today to help keep Noozhawk soaring.

We offer four membership levels: $5 a month, $10 a month, $25 a month or $1 a week. Payments can be made through PayPal below, or click here for information on recurring credit-card payments.

Thank you for your vital support.

Become a Supporter

Enter your email
Select your membership level

Payment Information

You are purchasing:

Payment Method

Pay by Credit Card:

Mastercard, Visa, American Express, Discover

Pay with Apple Pay or Google Pay:

Noozhawk partners with Stripe to provide secure invoicing and payments processing.

  • Ask
  • Vote
  • Investigate
  • Answer

Noozhawk Asks: What’s Your Question?

Welcome to Noozhawk Asks, a new feature in which you ask the questions, you help decide what Noozhawk investigates, and you work with us to find the answers.

Here’s how it works: You share your questions with us in the nearby box. In some cases, we may work with you to find the answers. In others, we may ask you to vote on your top choices to help us narrow the scope. And we’ll be regularly asking you for your feedback on a specific issue or topic.

We also expect to work together with the reader who asked the winning questions to find the answer together. Noozhawk’s objective is to come at questions from a place of curiosity and openness, and we believe a transparent collaboration is the key to achieve it.

The results of our investigation will be published here in this Noozhawk Asks section. Once or twice a month, we plan to do a review of what was asked and answered.

Thanks for asking!

Click Here to Get Started >

Reader Comments

Noozhawk is no longer accepting reader comments on our articles. Click here for the announcement. Readers are instead invited to submit letters to the editor by emailing them to [email protected]. Please provide your full name and community, as well as contact information for verification purposes only.

Daily Noozhawk

Subscribe to Noozhawk's A.M. Report, our free e-Bulletin sent out every day at 4:15 a.m. with Noozhawk's top stories, hand-picked by the editors.

Sign Up Now >