Facebook Pixel

Tuesday, September 14 , 2021, 5:40 am | Fog/Mist 58º

 
 
 
 

In response to Peggy Wilson’s March 29 commentary, “Santa Barbara School Board’s Rush to Teen Talk Not the Best Option for Sex Ed,” I feel that it’s necessary to address the opposition to the Santa Barbara Unified School District’s plan to adopt a sex ed curriculum that meets California’s requirements and better prepares our young people for the realities of intimate relationships and sexul activitiy.

Scott McCann Click to view larger
Scott McCann (McCann family photo)

The school board is considering adopting a new sex education curriculum called, Teen Talk Middle School, to meet updated state requirements.

Teaching human sexuality at Santa Barbara City College for the past 20 years, the majority of the hundreds of students I’ve had who attended our local junior and senior high schools have consistently said they were not adequately prepared to deal with the realities of sexual involvement and intimate relationships.

High rates of sexual assault, eating disorders, homophobia, abusive relationships, unintended pregnancies and sexually transmitted infections (STIs) are powerful evidence that we are failing to protect and prepare our children.

A vocal minority of community members has objected to the curriculum and more thorough sexuality education, while the vast majority of parents support comprehensive sex education but tend not to speak up about it. Our schools clearly need to spend more time and cover more topics to ensure the sexual health and safety of our young people.

To parents who worry about sex education in schools, research has shown that the more young people know about sexuality and the more comfortable they are discussing it, the more cautious and healthy they will be when they become sexually active.

To those who say it’s the parent’s job to educate their children about sex, I couldn’t agree more. But the fact is that most parents don’t talk to their kids much about sex.

Sign Up for the A.M. Report

Keep up with Noozhawk's daily COVID-19 coverage, delivered at 4:15 a.m. right to your inbox.

Some parents tell their children to wait until marriage, but it’s highly unlikely that young people will postpone sex for the 15 years from puberty to the current average age of marriage, which is about 27. Some parents tell their kids to use condoms, but fail to teach them how.

Very few parents discuss sexual decision making, body image, abuse prevention, consent, gender, sexual orientation, healthy relationships and other critically important sex-related topics with their children.

My college students whose parents tried to hide sex from them and pulled them out of sex education classes say this increased their curiosity and risky behavior, and left them more vulnerable to abuse, eating disorders, bullying, suicidal thoughts, unplanned pregnancy and STIs.

Without education from parents and schools, young people rely on friends, the Internet, and trial and error to learn about sex.

Friends can be supportive, but are often as uninformed as their peers. While the Internet has much valuable information, young people need guidance in interpreting what they see. Many young people now see pornography on the Internet by age 10. Parents may try to limit their children’s access, but their friends will show them, and parents will miss the opportunity to educate them about the misleading images and messages found on the Internet.

And, trial and error is a costly way to learn.

Sex is one of the most profound aspects of life, with its ability to promote long-term loving relationships, to provide pleasure and to create new life. Why would we want to withhold information about something as wonderful as sex? Teaching young people how to manage it makes much more sense.

Parents have the right to withdraw their child from sex education. But they don’t have the right to stop other people’s children from learning about this central part of human development. So do the right thing, and contact school board president Laura Capps at [email protected] to tell her you support the district’s efforts to improve the quality of sex education.

Scott McCann Ph.D. has taught human sexuality at Santa Barbara City College for the past 20 years, and at Antioch University Santa Barbara for 10. He is a former education director at the Santa Barbara County Public Health Department and at Planned Parenthood California Central Coast. The opinions expressed are his own.

Support Noozhawk Today!

Our professional journalists are working round the clock to make sure you have the news and information you need in these uncertain times.

If you appreciate Noozhawk’s coronavirus coverage, and the rest of the local Santa Barbara County news we deliver to you 24/7, please become a member of our Hawks Club today.

You need us more than ever, and we need your support.

We provide special member benefits to show how much we appreciate your confidence.

Email (Required)
I would like to give ...
Great! You're joining as a Red-Tailed Hawk!
  • Ask
  • Vote
  • Investigate
  • Answer

Noozhawk Asks: What’s Your Question?

Welcome to Noozhawk Asks, a new feature in which you ask the questions, you help decide what Noozhawk investigates, and you work with us to find the answers.

Here’s how it works: You share your questions with us in the nearby box. In some cases, we may work with you to find the answers. In others, we may ask you to vote on your top choices to help us narrow the scope. And we’ll be regularly asking you for your feedback on a specific issue or topic.

We also expect to work together with the reader who asked the winning questions to find the answer together. Noozhawk’s objective is to come at questions from a place of curiosity and openness, and we believe a transparent collaboration is the key to achieve it.

The results of our investigation will be published here in this Noozhawk Asks section. Once or twice a month, we plan to do a review of what was asked and answered.

Thanks for asking!

Click Here to Get Started >

Noozhawk Marketplace