Friday, May 25 , 2018, 2:47 pm | A Few Clouds 65º

 
 
 
 

Dick Polman: Republican ‘Hollow Men’ Ever Spineless in Face of Crisis

Whenever I ponder the despicable impotence of congressional Republicans — especially now, as we lurch toward a national crisis long in the making — I am reminded of a famous poem by T.S. Eliot:

We are the hollow men
We are the stuffed men
Leaning together
Headpiece filled with straw ...

There’s a lot more, but you get the drift. And here’s a straw head in action, as captured Tuesday by a reporter in a Capitol Hill corridor:

Q: “Should the Senate act to keep (President Donald) Trump from firing (special counsel Robert) Mueller?”

Sen. Orrin Hatch, R-Utah: “He’s not going to do that.”

Q: “Why do you say that?”

OH: “He’s just not going to do it.”

Q: “How can you be so confident?”

OH: “I’m quite sure he won’t do it. Unless there’s something else really bad that happens.”

Q: “Why not take up one of these bills to protect (Mueller)?”

OH: “I don’t think we should do that.”

Q: “Why not?”

OH: “Well, because I don’t think — I think it’s up to the president. I think he should — I don’t think he’s going to do that.”

Q: “But he has openly contemplated it.”

OH: “Yeah, I don’t think he’s going to.”

Q: “Has he told you that?”

OH: “No.”

As Trump creeps ever closer toward emulating the autocrats in Russia, Turkey and Hungary, the Republicans who run a so-called equal branch of government continue to disgrace themselves and imperil us.

Hatch was joined by the usual hapless suspects, all of whom meet Eliot’s criteria for hollow behavior: “Shape without form, shade without color / Paralyzed force, gesture without motion.”

Speaking of a paralyzed force, Senate Majority “Leader” Mitch McConnell, R-Ky., was asked whether the chamber should take proactive steps to protect the federal investigation into Trump’s multifaceted scandals — most notably, Mueller’s job.

He replied: “I haven’t seen any clear indication yet that we needed to pass something to keep him from being removed because I don’t think that’s going to happen.”

How much “clear indication” do these people need?

Trump has already sought to fire Mueller at least twice before backing down, and during his tirade last week, he said: “Why don’t I just fire Mueller? ... We’ll see what happens. And many people have said, you should fire him.”

Those “many people” are a distinct minority. The latest national Quinnipiac University Poll says that 69 percent of all voters — including 55 percent of Republicans — want Mueller on the job.

Worst of all is their catch-22 reasoning. They say there’s no need to protect Mueller because Trump hasn’t done anything “yet” (McConnell) and because Trump won’t do anything “unless there’s something else really bad that happens” (Hatch).

But if Trump lashes out by firing Mueller, it will then be too late to protect him. And what would congressional Republicans do if that happens? Would they perchance take action against Trump’s flagrant obstruction of justice?

Here’s an answer from Senate Majority Whip John Cornyn, R-Texas: “I’m not going to speculate as to what we would do.”

How about House Speaker Paul Ryan, R-Wis.? What did the soon-to-be-former speaker has reportedly decided not to run for re-election (as yours truly and others predicted), because it’s easier to cut and run than to stand and fight for the soul of his party.

Freed from electoral constraints, Ryan could perform a public service by drawing a line in the sand against Trump’s authoritarian impulses, but that isn’t likely to happen — because 89 percent of grassroots Republicans endorse Trump’s cult of personality.

And that best explains congressional Republicans’ calculated impotence. In a tough midterm year, they need the Trump cultists to show up on Election Day. If they dared to cross the Leader, they’d risk ticking off “the base” and depressing Republican turnout.

It doesn’t matter that Trump is “losing his shit” (as one operative close to the White House tells Politico), because the enablers on Capitol Hill can’t conceive of putting the country first. Instead, it’s party tribalism uber alles.

But it’s Eliot who best captures the cowardice of hollow men:

Our dried voices, when
We whisper together
Are quiet and meaningless
As wind in dry grass
Or rats’ feet over broken glass
In our dry cellar.

Dick Polman is the national political columnist at NewsWorks/WHYY in Philadelphia, a “writer in residence” at the University of Pennsylvania and is syndicated by Cagle Cartoons. Email him at [email protected] and follow him on Twitter: @DickPolman1. Click here for previous columns. The opinions expressed are his own.

Support Noozhawk Today

You are an important ally in our mission to deliver clear, objective, high-quality professional news reporting for Santa Barbara, Goleta and the rest of Santa Barbara County. Join the Hawks Club today to help keep Noozhawk soaring.

We offer four membership levels: $5 a month, $10 a month, $25 a month or $1 a week. Payments can be made through PayPal below, or click here for information on recurring credit-card payments.

Thank you for your vital support.

Become a Supporter

Enter your email
Select your membership level
×

Payment Information

You are purchasing:

Payment Method

Pay by Credit Card:

Mastercard, Visa, American Express, Discover

Pay with Apple Pay or Google Pay:

Noozhawk partners with Stripe to provide secure invoicing and payments processing.

  • Ask
  • Vote
  • Investigate
  • Answer

Noozhawk Asks: What’s Your Question?

Welcome to Noozhawk Asks, a new feature in which you ask the questions, you help decide what Noozhawk investigates, and you work with us to find the answers.

Here’s how it works: You share your questions with us in the nearby box. In some cases, we may work with you to find the answers. In others, we may ask you to vote on your top choices to help us narrow the scope. And we’ll be regularly asking you for your feedback on a specific issue or topic.

We also expect to work together with the reader who asked the winning questions to find the answer together. Noozhawk’s objective is to come at questions from a place of curiosity and openness, and we believe a transparent collaboration is the key to achieve it.

The results of our investigation will be published here in this Noozhawk Asks section. Once or twice a month, we plan to do a review of what was asked and answered.

Thanks for asking!

Click Here to Get Started >

Reader Comments

Noozhawk is no longer accepting reader comments on our articles. Click here for the announcement. Readers are instead invited to submit letters to the editor by emailing them to [email protected]. Please provide your full name and community, as well as contact information for verification purposes only.

Daily Noozhawk

Subscribe to Noozhawk's A.M. Report, our free e-Bulletin sent out every day at 4:15 a.m. with Noozhawk's top stories, hand-picked by the editors.

Sign Up Now >