Thursday, July 19 , 2018, 11:23 pm | Overcast 66º


Karen Telleen-Lawton: Scott Pruitt: Fox Guarding Hen House

I cringe whenever I read the name Scott Pruitt, which is too bad since I’m quite fond of my brother-in-law Scott, as well as Scott Tissues.

Scott Pruitt is the administrator of the Environmental Protection Agency, whose charge is to ensure clean air, water and land for U.S. citizens. This administration’s EPA administrator seems proud to be the fox guarding the hen house.

In his first year as EPA chief, Pruitt proposed repealing or delaying more than 30 significant environmental rules, according to The New Yorker. Pruitt didn’t even object when the White House announced one of the largest cuts for any federal agency: 25 percent.

In an agency necessarily driven by science, the EPA chief is skeptical of the scientific consensus that climate change is mainly due to human activity. He joined the president at the White House when Trump announced the United States’ withdrawal from the Paris climate accord.

This bad-dream-come-true is especially difficult for William Ruckelshaus, the agency’s first administrator. He served under two presidents: Richard Nixon, who established the EPA in 1970, and Ronald Reagan.

Ruckelshaus has commented: “My principal concern is that Pruitt and the people he’s hired to work with him don’t fundamentally agree with the mission of the agency.”

Ruckelshaus goes on to explain, “The environment is something you have to stay everlastingly at. Or it gets worse again.”

In a typical move, Pruitt proposed the repeal last November of a Clean Air Act emissions standard on a class of heavy-duty trucks combining new cabs and chassis with old engines.

These “gliders” represent a small percentage of the heavy-duty truck fleet but, emit an enormous share of old-fashioned pollution. EPA scientists estimate 1,600 deaths annually are attributable to glider pollution.

December’s public hearing about the proposed change naturally drew environmental and public-health groups. What made the hearing stunning was the attendance supporting the regulation of Volvo Group NA (which makes Volvo and Mack trucks) and the American Trucking Association.

Susan Alt, Volvo North America’s vice-president of public affairs, testified that the proposed repeal “makes a mockery of the massive investments we’ve made to develop low-emission-compliant technology.”

Bob Nuss, the American Trucking Association’s 2017 Truck Dealer of the Year, said, “I told them, ‘Maybe it’s only five per cent of the trucks, but how would we all feel if five per cent of the trucks didn’t have to stop for a school bus or obey the speed limit?’

"Sneaking around, avoiding emissions compliance, filling the air with soot — it’s just not right.”

Pruitt’s meeting schedule was secret until he succumbed to dozens of government transparency lawsuits. Now his online calendar reveals his meetings are overwhelmingly with industry representatives. Environmental groups are all but shunned.

William Reilly, the EPA administrator under President George H.W. Bush, objects to this.

Reilly recalls: “I had a good reputation with industry. I was on the board of DuPont after EPA. But you’re supposed to meet with everybody ... Industry is unlikely to be the source of information about developing environmental problems.”

The one area Pruitt supports is Superfunds. Yet here his priorities for action look like a lesson in political favoritism. Orange County’s North Basin site, contaminated by industrial factories, metal processing businesses and dry-cleaning facilities, is a case in point.

The EPA assigned the North Basin site a score of 50 on its zero-to-100 hazard ranking system. But soon after a meeting between Pruitt and the Orange County Water District, arranged by conservative radio and TV host Hugh Hewitt, the site got fast-tracked.

A Freedom of Information Act request for documentation of the task force’s deliberations was told none had been found. The fox appears to be guarding all hen houses, except those belonging to special friends.

Pruitt’s practice is to insulate himself from view — and from opposing views. He is purposefully undoing decades of environmental progress that have made our nation one of the safest and healthiest places to live and do business.

Under Pruitt’s anti-stewardship, the EPA may find itself a languishing Superfund site.

— Karen Telleen-Lawton serves seniors and pre-seniors as the principal of Decisive Path Fee-Only Financial Advisory in Santa Barbara. You can reach her with your financial planning questions at [email protected]. Click here to read previous columns. The opinions expressed are her own.

Support Noozhawk Today

You are an important ally in our mission to deliver clear, objective, high-quality professional news reporting for Santa Barbara, Goleta and the rest of Santa Barbara County. Join the Hawks Club today to help keep Noozhawk soaring.

We offer four membership levels: $5 a month, $10 a month, $25 a month or $1 a week. Payments can be made through Stripe below, or click here for information on recurring credit-card payments and a mailing address for checks.

Thank you for your vital support.

Become a Noozhawk Supporter

First name
Last name
Enter your email
Select your membership level

Payment Information

You are purchasing:

Payment Method

Pay by Credit Card:

Mastercard, Visa, American Express, Discover
One click only, please!

Pay with Apple Pay or Google Pay:

Noozhawk partners with Stripe to provide secure invoicing and payments processing.

  • Ask
  • Vote
  • Investigate
  • Answer

Noozhawk Asks: What’s Your Question?

Welcome to Noozhawk Asks, a new feature in which you ask the questions, you help decide what Noozhawk investigates, and you work with us to find the answers.

Here’s how it works: You share your questions with us in the nearby box. In some cases, we may work with you to find the answers. In others, we may ask you to vote on your top choices to help us narrow the scope. And we’ll be regularly asking you for your feedback on a specific issue or topic.

We also expect to work together with the reader who asked the winning questions to find the answer together. Noozhawk’s objective is to come at questions from a place of curiosity and openness, and we believe a transparent collaboration is the key to achieve it.

The results of our investigation will be published here in this Noozhawk Asks section. Once or twice a month, we plan to do a review of what was asked and answered.

Thanks for asking!

Click Here to Get Started >

Reader Comments

Noozhawk is no longer accepting reader comments on our articles. Click here for the announcement. Readers are instead invited to submit letters to the editor by emailing them to [email protected]. Please provide your full name and community, as well as contact information for verification purposes only.

Daily Noozhawk

Subscribe to Noozhawk's A.M. Report, our free e-Bulletin sent out every day at 4:15 a.m. with Noozhawk's top stories, hand-picked by the editors.

Sign Up Now >

Meet Your Realtor Sponsored by Village Properties

Photo of Elizabeth Wagner
Elizabeth Wagner
"I consider myself to be an up front and honest agent and willing to talk my clients out of purchasing a property that isn’t right for them or won’t meet their needs in a year or two."

Full Profile >