Thursday, July 19 , 2018, 8:57 am | Overcast 66º

 
 
 
 

Local News

Short-Term Vacation Rentals Exacerbate Santa Barbara’s Tight Local Housing Market

With low-income tenants getting squeezed, housing commission likely to recommend that City Council adopt stricter enforcement policy

To illustrate the growing challenge of short-term vacation rental units, the Housing Authority of the City of Santa Barbara compiled a map of more than 300 of the units that are registered as such in the city.
To illustrate the growing challenge of short-term vacation rental units, the Housing Authority of the City of Santa Barbara compiled a map of more than 300 of the units that are registered as such in the city. (Housing Authority of the City of Santa Barbara illustration)

Finding affordable housing in Santa Barbara’s tight rental market is difficult, but the proliferation of short-term vacation rental websites is making the search all the more aggravating.

At a time when the city boasts a 99.5-percent rental-occupancy rate, Santa Barbara records show at least 330 short-term rentals were registered with Airbnb and the like, spread throughout the tourist-centric coastal city.

Worse yet is the impact on Santa Barbara’s poorest residents. Some former Section 8 landlords are opting against renting to low-income tenants with vouchers, instead turning precious affordable supply into short-term rentals.

According to the Housing Authority of the City of Santa Barbara, which met last week to discuss the growing problem, nearly 100 of its clients are currently looking for Section 8 housing.

The housing commission will soon forward a recommendation on the issue to the City Council, which will consider amending its short-term rental policy in June.

New rules are especially needed because most people renting rooms or homes to visitors for fewer than 30 consecutive days are doing so illegally, and Santa Barbara officials knowingly ignore it.

Short-term rental owners can’t operate in a residential zone, since it’s considered a business. Right now, officials force them to pay for a business license and transient-occupancy taxes.

Last year alone, the city collected $800,000 in bed taxes from short-term rentals, city manager Paul Casey said in a budget meeting last month.

“TOT is in no way sufficient mitigation from this process,” said Geoff Green, chairman of the housing commission. “Everybody’s got a share in this.”

The commission could suggest limiting or eliminating the growing phenomenon popping up in virtually every neighborhood and across all types of zones. A map displayed at last Wednesday’s meeting plotted the addresses of short-term rental units registered with the city.

The number of such rentals varies depending on which report you use.

Rob Fredericks, deputy executive director of the Housing Authority, said Santa Barbara found more than 300 units, but a second report lists more than 500 and a third estimates the number at more than 1,000.

There are an estimated 22,401 rental housing units in the city, he said, which means just 112 total units are available to lease.

Fredericks looked at the map and said with certainty that several former Section 8 landlords were among those operating illegal short-term rentals.

Rents have increased 7.1 percent since October 2014, he said, and occupancy rates have hovered above 99 percent since October 2013.

The average rent of a two-bedroom apartment now approaches $2,000 per month, Fredericks said.

Buying a home isn’t any easier. Santa Barbara is the least affordable county in California, with a mere 14 percent of residents who can afford a median home price of $930,000, according to data from the UCSB Economic Forecast.

Low vacancy causes many of the low-income families, seniors and people with disabilities the housing authority serves to fail at locating a unit to rent under its Section 8 housing choice voucher program, which provides incentives for landlords who participate.

Over the last year, the authority’s lease-up rate success for that program has dropped 60 percent, Fredericks said, while program costs continually rise.

City planners present at the meeting acknowledged enforcement discrepancies and asked for direction.

Green said he saw a “bright line” between using a primary residence as an income generator versus out-of-towners buying a home they don’t live in but rent out.

“To me, that’s a very different use,” he said. “It does impact the overall availability and is so clearly a violation of city zoning. You can get more (money) in two weekends than any month-long lease in this system.”

Issues that neighbors of short-term rentals face was a concern for some commissioners, including Catherine Woodford, who argued that neighbor relations should fall within the housing commission’s purview.

Commission vice chairman David Hughes disagreed, urging his colleagues to create a data-driven report that sticks to the facts.

“I think the data and evidence clearly show there’s an impact on housing availability and rental housing market,” he said.

Commissioners debated how long it would take the city to enact a new policy, with some guessing more than 18 months and others who said they were disgusted with that timeframe.

In the end, the commissioners directed staff to draft a report, which Green and Hughes could look over as a subcommittee before it goes to the City Council sometime next month.

Noozhawk staff writer Gina Potthoff can be reached at .(JavaScript must be enabled to view this email address). Follow Noozhawk on Twitter: @noozhawk, @NoozhawkNews and @NoozhawkBiz. Connect with Noozhawk on Facebook.

Support Noozhawk Today

You are an important ally in our mission to deliver clear, objective, high-quality professional news reporting for Santa Barbara, Goleta and the rest of Santa Barbara County. Join the Hawks Club today to help keep Noozhawk soaring.

We offer four membership levels: $5 a month, $10 a month, $25 a month or $1 a week. Payments can be made through Stripe below, or click here for information on recurring credit-card payments and a mailing address for checks.

Thank you for your vital support.

Become a Noozhawk Supporter

First name
Last name
Enter your email
Select your membership level
×

Payment Information

You are purchasing:

Payment Method

Pay by Credit Card:

Mastercard, Visa, American Express, Discover
One click only, please!

Pay with Apple Pay or Google Pay:

Noozhawk partners with Stripe to provide secure invoicing and payments processing.

  • Ask
  • Vote
  • Investigate
  • Answer

Noozhawk Asks: What’s Your Question?

Welcome to Noozhawk Asks, a new feature in which you ask the questions, you help decide what Noozhawk investigates, and you work with us to find the answers.

Here’s how it works: You share your questions with us in the nearby box. In some cases, we may work with you to find the answers. In others, we may ask you to vote on your top choices to help us narrow the scope. And we’ll be regularly asking you for your feedback on a specific issue or topic.

We also expect to work together with the reader who asked the winning questions to find the answer together. Noozhawk’s objective is to come at questions from a place of curiosity and openness, and we believe a transparent collaboration is the key to achieve it.

The results of our investigation will be published here in this Noozhawk Asks section. Once or twice a month, we plan to do a review of what was asked and answered.

Thanks for asking!

Click Here to Get Started >

Reader Comments

Noozhawk is no longer accepting reader comments on our articles. Click here for the announcement. Readers are instead invited to submit letters to the editor by emailing them to [email protected]. Please provide your full name and community, as well as contact information for verification purposes only.

Daily Noozhawk

Subscribe to Noozhawk's A.M. Report, our free e-Bulletin sent out every day at 4:15 a.m. with Noozhawk's top stories, hand-picked by the editors.

Sign Up Now >