Saturday, June 23 , 2018, 11:47 am | Fog/Mist 67º

 
 
 
 

Mark Shields: Ronald Reagan and Nancy Pelosi — 2 Real Professionals

Former President Ronald Reagan is hands down the most electorally successful American politician of the post-World War II era. As the outsider nominee of the nation's then-decidedly minority party, nobody has ever come close to matching his back-to-back 44-state and 49-state landslide White House victories. Acknowledged as a conviction conservative, Reagan succeeded in forging alliances, as governor and as president, by practicing what he preached: "Remember, the fellow who agrees with you 80 percent of the time is your friend and ally, not 20 percent traitor."

The Gipper understood completely: A wining political party is not an exclusive private club with its own admission and litmus tests that a person must first pass to join. No, a successful party, by definition, is a coalition of many different people who come together to support policies on which they mostly agree.

But liberals and many Democrats (whose party is now weaker in the Washington minority and state capitols than at any time since 1928) insist that unless someone is an uncritical supporter and endorser of legal abortion, he or she cannot be a Democrat in good standing.

Forget that when the Gallup Poll asked, as it does each year, whether people "personally believe that in general it is morally acceptable or morally wrong" to have an abortion, 49 percent of Americans answered "morally wrong" — almost identical to the 2008 response, the year Barack Obama won the presidency. The reality is that after dramatic changes in the public acceptance of same-sex marriage and gay rights, Americans' conflicted ambivalence on abortion continues to be simultaneously pro-choice and anti-abortion. Voters, sensitive to the painful decision a pregnant woman might make after consulting her conscience, her pastor and her physician, have no appetite for criminalizing the woman for her choice. But those same voters also know that an abortion is not a tonsillectomy, that what is involved here is either potential or actual life. Nobody is going to win a contested election in 2018 on a platform of "what this country needs is more abortions."

U.S. Rep. Dan Lipinski is a socially conservative union-friendly Chicago Democrat with the backing of the firefighters, steelworkers and Illinois AFL-CIO. He is being challenged in the March 20 Illinois primary for an eighth term by first-time candidate Marie Newman, a social entrepreneur and anti-bullying advocate who has strong endorsements from NARAL Pro Choice America and EMILY's List, the latter of which backs pro-choice Democratic women candidates.

The Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee, which, as a matter of course, backs Democratic House incumbents, is withholding any support from Lipinski, one of only a handful of pro-life congressional Democrats including U.S. Sens. Bob Casey of Pennsylvania and Joe Donnelly of Indiana, who are both in tough re-election races this year.

One leading pro-choice Democrat has broken ranks and endorsed Lipinski — House Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi of California, the only woman House speaker in U.S. history and the only speaker ever able to get the House to pass national health care (which she did three separate times), who forcefully told the Washington Post's Karen Tumulty last year: "This is the Democratic Party. This is not a rubber-stamp party." She continued: "I grew up Nancy D'Alesandro in Baltimore, Md.; in Little Italy; in a very devout Catholic family; fiercely patriotic. ... Most of those people — my family, my extended family — are not pro-choice. You think I'm kicking them out of the Democratic Party?" One wonders if in the silos of our politics some liberals have ever met any of the 46 percent of Americans who identify as "pro-life."

There you have it: Ronald Reagan and Nancy Pelosi, two political pros who grasped that politics is about addition, not subtraction, and about welcoming converts instead of hunting down and banishing heretics.

Mark Shields is one of the most widely recognized political commentators in the United States. The former Washington Post editorial columnist appears regularly on CNN, on public television and on radio. Click here to contact him, or click here to read previous columns. The opinions expressed are his own.

Support Noozhawk Today

You are an important ally in our mission to deliver clear, objective, high-quality professional news reporting for Santa Barbara, Goleta and the rest of Santa Barbara County. Join the Hawks Club today to help keep Noozhawk soaring.

We offer four membership levels: $5 a month, $10 a month, $25 a month or $1 a week. Payments can be made through PayPal below, or click here for information on recurring credit-card payments.

Thank you for your vital support.

Become a Noozhawk Supporter

First name
Last name
Enter your email
Select your membership level
×

Payment Information

You are purchasing:

Payment Method

Pay by Credit Card:

Mastercard, Visa, American Express, Discover

Pay with Apple Pay or Google Pay:

Noozhawk partners with Stripe to provide secure invoicing and payments processing.

  • Ask
  • Vote
  • Investigate
  • Answer

Noozhawk Asks: What’s Your Question?

Welcome to Noozhawk Asks, a new feature in which you ask the questions, you help decide what Noozhawk investigates, and you work with us to find the answers.

Here’s how it works: You share your questions with us in the nearby box. In some cases, we may work with you to find the answers. In others, we may ask you to vote on your top choices to help us narrow the scope. And we’ll be regularly asking you for your feedback on a specific issue or topic.

We also expect to work together with the reader who asked the winning questions to find the answer together. Noozhawk’s objective is to come at questions from a place of curiosity and openness, and we believe a transparent collaboration is the key to achieve it.

The results of our investigation will be published here in this Noozhawk Asks section. Once or twice a month, we plan to do a review of what was asked and answered.

Thanks for asking!

Click Here to Get Started >

Reader Comments

Noozhawk is no longer accepting reader comments on our articles. Click here for the announcement. Readers are instead invited to submit letters to the editor by emailing them to [email protected]. Please provide your full name and community, as well as contact information for verification purposes only.

Daily Noozhawk

Subscribe to Noozhawk's A.M. Report, our free e-Bulletin sent out every day at 4:15 a.m. with Noozhawk's top stories, hand-picked by the editors.

Sign Up Now >