Friday, October 19 , 2018, 7:48 pm | Fair 78º

 
 
 
 

Plains Trial Testimony Focuses on Initial Response to Refugio Oil Spill

During the second day of testimony in the Refugio Oil Spill criminal trial, Santa Barbara County Fire Battalion Chief Chris Childers recalled seeing the black slick in the ocean and recognizing it as a major incident.

On May 19, 2015, a Plains All-American Pipeline, L.P. oil and gas transmission pipeline ruptured on the Gaviota coast, spilling an estimated 123,228 gallons of crude oil. Some of the oil flowed into a culvert, under Highway 101, onto the bluffs and into the ocean near Refugio State Beach.

Opening statements were held Monday for the jury trial, in which Plains is charged with knowingly discharging a pollutant into state waters, failing to notify proper authorities, and violating California Fish and Game Code related to the illegal taking of animals (birds and marine mammals allegedly killed by the spill).

Childers said he called dispatch, letting the operator know it was a major incident and telling her to notify agencies including the U.S. Coast Guard and California Fish and Wildlife Department, and whoever else needed to be alerted.

Dispatch also called the California State Warning Center of the state Office of Emergency Services, known as CalOES.

A state representative then called Childers for more information on the spill, which at that point – at 12:45 p.m. on May 19, 2015, according to evidence submitted in court – had an unknown source.

“It’s thick and it’s black and it’s right on the beach,” he said in the call, estimating the slick was at that point about a 1/4-mile long and 200 feet deep.

The cause was unknown at that point, he said, adding that it was probably a broken pipeline somewhere.

Under cross examination, an attorney representing Plains asked Childers about the calls he and dispatch had made, and the government agencies who knew about the spill.

As of 12:50 p.m., five government agencies knew about the spill: County Fire, the county Office of Emergency Management, California State Parks, the U.S. Coast Guard and CalOES, Childers confirmed.

Plains representatives were on the scene of the spill and the ruptured pipeline around the same time County Fire personnel were, according to previous testimony, but some of the criminal charges relate to the company’s alleged failure to notify the proper authorities as required.

The Plains employees were going to participate in, coincidentally, an oil spill response drill at county Fire Station 18 in Gaviota planned for that morning, simulating an oil spill at a Freeport-McMoRan onshore facility.

Childers testified that in the early hours after discovering the spill, the only clean-up effort was the one by his firefighters making a temporary dam to stop the oil from flowing through the culvert to the ocean.

Helicopters and at least one clean-up boat arrived on the scene the afternoon of May 19, according to an incident report he referred to in court, but he recalled thinking there should have been more.

“I thought we were cleaning up far too slowly,” he said.

County Fire backed out of the Unified Command structure by the first night, since they did not have a role in the clean-up, Childers added.

The Unified Command did include the Coast Guard, Fish & Wildlife, the county Office of Emergency Management, State Parks and Plains, he said.

Childers, who was personable on the stand and talks quickly, prompted Judge James Herman to ask him to slow down multiple times.

“Try to take breaths between sentences,” Herman joked.

After Childers was excused, he walked away from the stand, waved to the jury and said, “Good luck.”

Testimony in the case continues Friday in Herman’s courtroom in Santa Barbara County Superior Court.

Noozhawk managing editor Giana Magnoli can be reached at .(JavaScript must be enabled to view this email address). Follow Noozhawk on Twitter: @noozhawk, @NoozhawkNews and @NoozhawkBiz. Connect with Noozhawk on Facebook.

Support Noozhawk Today

You are an important ally in our mission to deliver clear, objective, high-quality professional news reporting for Santa Barbara, Goleta and the rest of Santa Barbara County. Join the Hawks Club today to help keep Noozhawk soaring.

We offer four membership levels: $5 a month, $10 a month, $25 a month or $1 a week. Payments can be made using a credit card, Apple Pay or Google Pay, or click here for information on recurring credit-card payments and a mailing address for checks.

Thank you for your vital support.

Become a Noozhawk Supporter

First name
Last name
Email
Select your monthly membership
Or choose an annual membership
×

Payment Information

Membership Subscription

You are enrolling in . Thank you for joining the Hawks Club.

Payment Method

Pay by Credit Card:

Mastercard, Visa, American Express, Discover
One click only, please!

Pay with Apple Pay or Google Pay:

Noozhawk partners with Stripe to provide secure invoicing and payments processing.
You may cancel your membership at any time by sending an email to .(JavaScript must be enabled to view this email address).

  • Ask
  • Vote
  • Investigate
  • Answer

Noozhawk Asks: What’s Your Question?

Welcome to Noozhawk Asks, a new feature in which you ask the questions, you help decide what Noozhawk investigates, and you work with us to find the answers.

Here’s how it works: You share your questions with us in the nearby box. In some cases, we may work with you to find the answers. In others, we may ask you to vote on your top choices to help us narrow the scope. And we’ll be regularly asking you for your feedback on a specific issue or topic.

We also expect to work together with the reader who asked the winning questions to find the answer together. Noozhawk’s objective is to come at questions from a place of curiosity and openness, and we believe a transparent collaboration is the key to achieve it.

The results of our investigation will be published here in this Noozhawk Asks section. Once or twice a month, we plan to do a review of what was asked and answered.

Thanks for asking!

Click Here to Get Started >

Reader Comments

Noozhawk is no longer accepting reader comments on our articles. Click here for the announcement. Readers are instead invited to submit letters to the editor by emailing them to [email protected]. Please provide your full name and community, as well as contact information for verification purposes only.